Tab Content
  • DamianTV's Avatar
    Today, 12:18 PM
    The only thing HIGH is the people writing their report, because it sure as shit isnt Main Street saying the economy is doing great. And they also omitted some additional facts. In this New Poll, they ONLY polled Biden supporters, and excluded any people they thought might have supported Trump. So, of Biden supporters, 100% of Biden supporters apparently think that Biden is doing a good job and want to support Biden. That is CIRCULAR LOGIC within their poll. In a poll of people who think water is wet, they polled some water to ask water if water thought water is wet and 100% of water thinks water is wet. But they did not bother to poll anything that was dry, like, you know, a desert? This is how POLL MANIPULATIONS work. They do not ask questions in such a manner as to allow the person to have a good reflection of their opinions. They ask LEADING questions. How good of a job do you think Biden is doing with the economy? They do NOT ask "is Biden doing a good job". Leading questions result in misrepresented polling results.
    1 replies | 93 view(s)
  • CaptUSA's Avatar
    Yesterday, 09:35 AM
    71619 replies | 1748014 view(s)
  • CaptUSA's Avatar
    Yesterday, 09:32 AM
    71619 replies | 1748014 view(s)
  • CaptUSA's Avatar
    Yesterday, 08:14 AM
    Trump issued 10 vetoes himself. Only 1 was overturned. With 8 of them, the attempts to override them failed. The other 1, there was no attempt. There is no such law, rule, or any other provision that makes ANY piece of legislation veto-proof. This is reality; not your delusion. You're the one repeating "veto-proof, veto-proof, veto-proof", but there is NO SUCH THING. It may set up an attempt to over-ride, but the vote to over-ride is almost ALWAYS different than the vote to pass the legislation in the first place. Face it - He had a 90% success rate when he actually manned up to use his pen. If Trump didn't veto something, it's because he didn't want to. But YOU'RE desperate to believe your fantasy.
    46 replies | 983 view(s)
  • GlennwaldSnowdenAssanged's Avatar
    Yesterday, 08:13 AM
    Which idiot operates the apparatus between Trumps nose and chin?
    91 replies | 1178 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Yesterday, 06:27 AM
    Stick with the topic. I'm talking about fvcking mine fields! If a soldier has a conscience he won't shoot a child. A mine field doesn't have a conscience.
    91 replies | 1178 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Yesterday, 06:26 AM
    I missed responding to this part of your lunacy. (Thanks acptulsa for pointing this out). Come May 15, 2025 you won't be able to get on a freaking plane because of the REPUBLICAN sponsored RealID Act! You'll have to smuggle yourself out. And land mines will be a problem. I suspect Anti Federalist would rather just stand and fight to the bitter end but some of us have kids/grandkids to think about.
    91 replies | 1178 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Yesterday, 06:20 AM
    Literally NAZIs were at Charlottesville. That doesn't mean everybody there was a literal Nazi. You and Bongino are full of shyt. Edit: And neo Nazi Don Black donated to Ron Paul in 2008. His son is now transgender. So freaking what?
    11 replies | 176 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Yesterday, 06:17 AM
    Here's Ron Paul in 2008. Ron Paul on Immigration By John Stossel I'd heard that that presidential candidate Ron Paul was "hard line" on immigration and "to the right" of the Republican field. But that's not exactly what he revealed during my interview with him. Here's Part 4 of my edited interview. You want a 700-mile fence between our border and Mexico? Ron Paul: Not really. There was an immigration bill that had a fence (requirement) in it, but it was to attack amnesty. I don't like amnesty. So I voted for that bill, but I didn't like the fence. I don't think the fence can solve a problem. I find it rather offensive.
    91 replies | 1178 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Yesterday, 06:09 AM
    So....Dan Bongino was full of shyt Swordsmyth.
    11 replies | 176 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Yesterday, 06:04 AM
    :rolleyes: You know that first video was from freaking 2011 right? But I remember him saying this back in 2008. Tom Tancredo was the border hawk in the 2008 race. Is he who you supported back then? Just curious. And you actually support a fvcking minefield on the southern border? Just curious. Because it's a bat shyt crazy idea. I respect Anti Federalist as a person, but that's insane for the very reasons that it sounds like a good idea. A mine field doesn't know friend from foe. It can't even ask the question "What kind of American are you?" (Civil War clip). Edit: And Ron Paul voted FOR the war in Afghanistan before he later realized that was a mistake. But I now see why you sided with Nazi Dan Bongino over Daniel McAdams.
    91 replies | 1178 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    91 replies | 1178 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Yesterday, 05:43 AM
    So then when America gets so fvcked that maybe some of us want to leave we've got a minefield to deal with? Sounds like the Berlin wall. No thanks. Edit: And guess where I got this idea from? Sorry but PAF is more right than wrong on this one.
    91 replies | 1178 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Yesterday, 05:36 AM
    Is Trump your god? Serious question. Why are you judging Massie on how much he goes out of his way to kiss Trump's arse? As far as 2 year degrees verses something else, most people who get 2 year degrees are nurses or plumbers or accountants. I guess it's possible to get a 2 year degree in political science but I've never heard of someone actually doing that. There is a nursing shortage in this country. A 2 year nursing degree is more helpful to the country than a political science PhD. The other issue is that I know for a fact that some here, including Brian4Liberty, have been against expanding H1B visas. Those go to people with masters degrees in engineering and computer science. Back in the 1990s when I was in the comp sci graduate program at the University of Alabama at Birmingham, the overwhelming majority of the students in the department were foreign born, mostly India and China. Whether you think H1B visas are good or bad, Trump had been publicly saying he was against expanding them. But this is a stealth expansion. It's a flip flop.
    91 replies | 1178 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Yesterday, 05:23 AM
    Yeah. This sounds like an Elizabeth Warren "wealth tax." Tax people on their net worth rather than their income.
    8 replies | 304 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Yesterday, 05:21 AM
    It's infinity gauntlet chess. Obviously the Supreme Court's refusal to strike down much of the federal tax code is to get congress to turn around and abolish the tax code. Kind of like the bump fire stock ban in reverse.
    8 replies | 304 view(s)
  • CaptUSA's Avatar
    06-21-2024, 08:06 AM
    Leaked AI graphic of a climate change modeling calculator... Note that once all three levels of BS are forcibly mingled, twisted and intertwined, it becomes a huge spinning pile of BS.
    200 replies | 28052 view(s)
  • CaptUSA's Avatar
    06-21-2024, 07:36 AM
    NO SUCH THING
    46 replies | 983 view(s)
  • CaptUSA's Avatar
    06-21-2024, 06:56 AM
    71619 replies | 1748014 view(s)
  • CaptUSA's Avatar
    06-21-2024, 06:55 AM
    71619 replies | 1748014 view(s)
  • CaptUSA's Avatar
    06-21-2024, 06:53 AM
    71619 replies | 1748014 view(s)
  • CaptUSA's Avatar
    06-21-2024, 06:52 AM
    71619 replies | 1748014 view(s)
  • CaptUSA's Avatar
    06-21-2024, 06:52 AM
    71619 replies | 1748014 view(s)
  • CaptUSA's Avatar
    06-21-2024, 06:18 AM
    Answering questions with questions... Cool, tactic bro. We know what you're doing here.
    47 replies | 1622 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    06-21-2024, 04:36 AM
    But I asked you a specific question that didn't involve Trump. I thought you have the intelligence to follow along in a conversation. My bad for overestimating you. That's just stupid. Ron Paul proposed the idea. Rand Paul would go along with it. The only reason Rand doesn't go along with everything Ron proposes is that some things aren't popular with Rand's base. For example before Rand ran for senator, there's video of him being asked about Iran getting a nuclear weapon and his response was that's no big deal. He absolutely flip flopped on that after running and after being elected even signed the infamous Tom Cotton letter against the Obama / Iran nuclear deal (which is possibly a violation of the Logan Act). By contrast getting rid of the income tax would be hugely popular with his base. Not a valid reason. Spending levels need to be adjusted. And if you have any intelligence at all (which I'm beginning to doubt) you know that spending levels aren't based on tax revenue anyway. That's why they keep raising the debt ceiling. But replacing the income tax with tariffs forced congress to take spending seriously that's only a positive.
    47 replies | 1622 view(s)
  • GlennwaldSnowdenAssanged's Avatar
    06-21-2024, 03:47 AM
    The beast still needs to be fed.
    34 replies | 654 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    14 replies | 247 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    06-20-2024, 06:47 PM
    God forbid a Republican dominated Supreme Court declare "vast swaths" of the federal tax code unconstitutional, forcing the federal government to be drastically reduced. https://www.cbsnews.com/news/supreme-court-tax-decision-moore-v-us/ Washington — The Supreme Court on Thursday left intact an obscure tax enacted as part of Republicans' sweeping 2017 reform package that targets U.S. taxpayers with shares of certain foreign corporations. The court ruled 7-2 that the so-called mandatory repatriation tax, or MRT, is constitutional under Article I and the 16th Amendment, rejecting a challenge from a Washington couple, Charles and Kathleen Moore, who claimed the provision was outside the bounds of the Constitution. Justice Brett Kavanaugh wrote the majority opinion. Justices Clarence Thomas and Neil Gorsuch dissented. "he precise and narrow question that the Court addresses today is whether Congress may attribute an entity's realized and undistributed income to the entity's shareholders or partners, and then tax the shareholders or partners on their portions of that income," Kavanaugh wrote. "This Court's longstanding precedents, reflected in and reinforced by Congress's longstanding practice, establish that the answer is yes."
    8 replies | 304 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    06-20-2024, 06:42 PM
    It's a cheap and (usually) taste fruit! I also love peaches. (Not sure if that's considered a "black thing" or not). And mango. And kiwi. And dragon fruit. And pomegranates. (I knew another black family that had a tree in their year in Pell City Alabama). I guess I'm just fruity.
    2278 replies | 172894 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    06-20-2024, 05:00 PM
    3 replies | 217 view(s)
More Activity

49 Visitor Messages

  1. View Conversation
    Please stop trying to "out" Erowe1. Let it go.
  2. I know. Like I said I was going to yank your chain but realized that in the current circumstances it would be bad taste even for me.
  3. View Conversation
    At least until every county or so willingly decided to submit to Christ, which I think will happen eventually because I'm a postmillennialist.
  4. View Conversation
    I wish things were a lot more local too. I'm really not looking for a country of 300 million at all. I think that's too big. Those who didn't want to live by Christian law could live somewhere else and choose God's judgment over his blessings.
  5. View Conversation
    And while I do believe the BIble requires civil authorities to punish homosexuality, and with death as the maximum penalty, I don't think it would be legitimate even for the government to just round up people in a gay bar.

    My reasons on the bearing arms bit are much closer to yours (resistance against tyranny.)
  6. View Conversation
    To be perfectly clear, I absolutely oppose vigilantism. I know you were joking around but I just want you to be clear on where I stand.
  7. View Conversation
    Will you kindly give a tongue lashing to the racist of the board, AmericanSpartan? Thank you. I'd like to see it.
  8. Sorry, but you have failed. That verse does not contain the words "Grace is irresistible." You can interpret it that way, but that's not what the verse says. You had to admit there was "relational language" in the Bible. Yet you have stuck to your guns that there isn't a verse that says "Have a relationship with Jesus." Likewise there is no verse that says "Grace is irresistible." If you were honest you would simply admit that. But you aren't honest.
  9. View Conversation
    Acts 13:48
    And when the Gentiles heard this, they began rejoicing and glorifying the word of the Lord, and as many as were appointed to eternal life believed.
Showing Visitor Messages 1 to 10 of 49
Page 1 of 5 123 ... LastLast
Page 1 of 5 123 ... LastLast
About jmdrake

Basic Information

Profile Sidebar Configuration

Profile Sidebar Configuration

Activist Reputation (Self-Rated):
1
Select if you "Stand with Rand":
I Stand with Rand (This will add a "Stand with Rand" badge by your name badge by yourr name in all posts.)
Select if you do not support Trump or Hillary.:
No Trump. No Hillary. (This will add a "None of the Above" badge by your name in all posts.)

Signature


9/11 Thermate experiments

Winston Churchhill on why the U.S. should have stayed OUT of World War I

"I am so %^&*^ sick of this cult of Ron Paul. The Paulites. What is with these %^&*^ people? Why are there so many of them?" YouTube rant by "TheAmazingAtheist"

"We as a country have lost faith and confidence in freedom." -- Ron Paul

"It can be a challenge to follow the pronouncements of President Trump, as he often seems to change his position on any number of items from week to week, or from day to day, or even from minute to minute." -- Ron Paul
Quote Originally Posted by Brian4Liberty View Post
The road to hell is paved with good intentions. No need to make it a superhighway.
Quote Originally Posted by osan View Post
The only way I see Trump as likely to affect any real change would be through martial law, and that has zero chances of success without strong buy-in by the JCS at the very minimum.

Statistics


Total Posts
Total Posts
49,224
Posts Per Day
7.90
Visitor Messages
Total Messages
49
Most Recent Message
11-05-2016 03:40 PM
General Information
Last Activity
Yesterday 06:27 AM
Join Date
06-06-2007
Referrals
5

41 Friends

  1. affa affa is offline

    Member

    affa
  2. billjston4 billjston4 is offline

    New Member

    billjston4
  3. bobbyw24 bobbyw24 is offline

    Banned

    bobbyw24
  4. bv3 bv3 is offline

    Member

    bv3
  5. Cap Cap is offline

    Member

    Cap
  6. Captain Shays Captain Shays is offline

    Member

    Captain Shays
  7. CaptUSA CaptUSA is offline

    Member

    CaptUSA
  8. Christian Liberty
  9. cjm cjm is offline

    Member

    cjm
  10. Crowish Crowish is offline

    Member

    Crowish
Showing Friends 1 to 10 of 41
Page 1 of 5 123 ... LastLast
View jmdrake's Blog

Recent Entries

How Ron Paul could smack down Iran critics

by jmdrake on 05-15-2013 at 08:34 AM
Quote Originally Posted by jmdrake View Post
Ron needs to quit playing defense and go on offense. It's not enough to say "the Soviet Union was worse than Iran." If he could point out the following documented facts it would shut the naysayer up for good or at least make them back-peddle.

1) In 2003 Iran was the only Muslim country to help us fight and remove the Taliban from power.

See: Jane's Defense Weekly India joins anti-Taliban coalition. "India is believed to have joined Russia, the USA

Read More

Categories
Uncategorized

The new bill of rights.

by jmdrake on 05-15-2013 at 08:33 AM
Quote Originally Posted by jmdrake View Post
This parody is an attempt to "rewrite" the bill of rights in keeping with the current application by our criminal government. Original text will be in italics followed by a list of possible options.


Amendment I

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government

Read More

Categories
Uncategorized

Federal Reserve advised gold standard for Russia

by jmdrake on 05-15-2013 at 08:32 AM
Quote Originally Posted by jmdrake View Post
I ran across this information by accident (providence?) while looking for something else. The first link is an essay from Jude Wanniski who went with fed governor Wayne Angell to Moscow right after the collapse of the soviet union. Note that Angell advocated the new Russia to go to a gold backed currency! The second link is an online Google book from the Mises institute that talks about the same essay. I've excerpted the essay bellow. (It's too long to post directly). It's interesting to note

Read More

Categories
Uncategorized

Washington Post 2002 : The U.S. pushed jihad on Afghan schoolchildren.

by jmdrake on 09-13-2011 at 01:15 PM
Quote Originally Posted by dannno View Post
From U.S., the ABC's of Jihad
Violent Soviet-Era Textbooks Complicate Afghan Education Efforts


By Joe Stephens and David B. Ottaway
Washington Post Staff Writers
Saturday, March 23, 2002; Page A01

In the twilight of the Cold War, the United States spent millions of dollars to supply Afghan schoolchildren with textbooks filled with violent images and militant Islamic teachings, part of covert attempts to spur resistance to the Soviet occupation.

Read More

Categories
Uncategorized
Page 1 of 12 12311 ... LastLast

06-22-2024


05-29-2024


05-27-2024


05-22-2024


05-16-2024


05-14-2024


05-09-2024


05-03-2024


05-02-2024


05-01-2024


04-22-2024


04-16-2024


12-12-2023


08-29-2023


08-06-2023


08-03-2023


08-01-2023



Page 1 of 12 12311 ... LastLast

11-17-2017


Page 1 of 432 1231151101 ... LastLast

06-23-2024


06-22-2024


06-21-2024


06-20-2024


06-19-2024



Page 1 of 432 1231151101 ... LastLast