Tab Content
  • Cleaner44's Avatar
    Today, 10:58 AM
    If you disagree, I am willing to bet $10. Are you willing to put your $10 on Hillary?
    18 replies | 112 view(s)
  • Cleaner44's Avatar
    Today, 10:40 AM
    Probably because Ron Paul learned and shared long ago that if we want to achieve change or win an election, it must be through the two party system. We may not like it, but the Libertarian party won't be winning the White House this year. The article is correct, Trump will beat Hillary and be the next president.
    18 replies | 112 view(s)
  • PaulConventionWV's Avatar
    Today, 05:03 AM
    I would like to note in amendment to my previous post that I am speaking from a position of faith. I believe that we should choose to act morally because we do not know what we are predestined for. That is, I think we will eventually be judged by God based on our moral character. However, in seeing this particular post by osan, I noticed that he took for granted Kant's argument that "if we are not free to choose, then it is meaningless to say we should choose to behave morally." I, however, disagree with that notion. It may appear to be a logical contradiction on the face of it, but if you consider the context, it becomes clear that the existence of an illusion separate from reality does not preclude the validity of illusory experiences. Although the illusion isn't real, per se, it does not necessarily mean that the illusion should be treated as a falsehood. Rather, it should be treated as a designated component of the overall reality. We should not simply assume that the illusion is meaningless, for it could have a purpose, and that purpose can be explained as such: We don't know what the future will hold for us because we don't know God's plan, so it follows that we cannot assume any particular outcome in reality just by virtue of knowing that we live in an illusion. Therefore, we should treat the illusion of free will as valid because, although anything we "choose" to do will have been pre-destined when we actually do it, we could not have assumed that outcome, so we are forced to behave morally even given the knowledge that our experiences are illusory. This explanation would be incomplete, however, if it did not include the intent of God. The explanation given in the article that notes that people who read articles pro-deterministic would behave less morally than those who read neutral articles does not consider the intent angle, which is an extremely important angle to consider if one truly wants to understand the reason why the subjects reacted to the articles in such a way. It very well could be that the article, speaking from a secular point of view, instilled or somehow introduced the view that determinism is true, but left out the intent. In this way, the reader was swayed to assume that, not just determinism, but secular determinism, was favored. Without intent, it would indeed seem that life was basically pointless and choosing to behave morally was futile, but knowing that there is intent behind the illusion created provides one with the knowledge that they have a purpose despite the fact that their life is already determined, and faced with the ultimate realization that they don't know what they are determined to be, they must choose to act morally within the illusion so that they can ensure that their experience within the illusion matches to the written intent of God so as to make sure that they do not end up rebelling and finding out that they were one of the unfortunate ones who were determined for the lesser fate come the day of judgment when they finally see what the reality was. Note, however, that I said "lesser fate" and not "damnation" because I do not actually believe in eternal hell fire or damnation, which is another interesting topic to consider at another time, but is not necessary for the purpose of proving my point here, which is that it is most definitely possible to know you are in an illusion and still have the capacity to act morally as if the illusion were real because you know that there is intent behind the illusion and not just a vast expanse of meaningless nothingness.
    7 replies | 244 view(s)
  • PaulConventionWV's Avatar
    Today, 04:03 AM
    The title of this article pretty much sums up my beliefs. There's no free will, but we might as well believe in it because we simply don't know what we were predetermined for, so effort is still necessary since knowing that you are determined for something doesn't really help you know just what that is.
    7 replies | 244 view(s)
  • Cleaner44's Avatar
    Yesterday, 05:19 PM
    I love that Erick Erickson is pitching a baby fit about GOP no longer being the party of Bush/Romney. Erick Erickson: ‘I Think the Time Has Come for Mitt Romney’–Politico http://www.breitbart.com/2016-presidential-race/2016/05/20/erick-erickson-think-time-come-mitt-romney-politico/
    9 replies | 219 view(s)
  • Cleaner44's Avatar
    Yesterday, 02:42 PM
    The trend is continuing to get worse for Hillary. She is down by 2 points in yet another poll. A Look At What's Behind Donald Trump's Climb in New National Poll The latest national ABC News/Washington Post poll has Donald Trump in the tightest race yet with Hillary Clinton in the probable matchup between the two likely presidential nominees. Forty-six percent of respondents favor Trump over Clinton versus 44 percent who prefer a Clinton presidency. Even though Trump's lead is still within the margin of error, it is notable... http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/donald-trumps-climb-national-poll/story?id=39307308 http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2016/president/us/general_election_trump_vs_clinton-5491.html
    5 replies | 142 view(s)
  • Cleaner44's Avatar
    Yesterday, 09:23 AM
    Naomi Wolf wrote all about this at the end of the Bush years. Fascist America, in 10 easy steps http://www.theguardian.com/world/2007/apr/24/usa.comment
    18 replies | 328 view(s)
  • Cleaner44's Avatar
    05-22-2016, 06:33 PM
    I have no doubt that both candidates will piss off millions of people. Yet Clinton will lose this election.
    22 replies | 265 view(s)
  • Cleaner44's Avatar
    05-22-2016, 03:19 PM
    The discontent of neocons is quite satisfying.
    15 replies | 346 view(s)
  • Cleaner44's Avatar
    05-22-2016, 03:17 PM
    I find the "unfavorable" angle to be complete nonsense. Of course the most successful candidates have high unfavorables and they always will. People that run for president are going to be despised and politicians are rarely loved. It doesn't matter if Clinton and Trump both have unfavorable numbers in the 90s because one of them will still be elected.
    22 replies | 265 view(s)
  • Cleaner44's Avatar
    05-22-2016, 11:05 AM
    This election will be like others before it, a run to determine who the voters see as the lesser of two evils. Hilary will be seen as the greater evil.
    22 replies | 265 view(s)
  • Cleaner44's Avatar
    05-22-2016, 09:20 AM
    It will just get worse and worse for her as we get closer to the general election. It is tough to win an election when nobody likes you and even Democrat voters only back the candidate reluctantly. Clinton's Lead Over Trump Shrinks to 3 Points: New NBC News/WSJ Poll http://www.nbcnews.com/meet-the-press/clinton-s-lead-over-trump-shrinks-3-points-new-nbc-n577726
    22 replies | 265 view(s)
  • PaulConventionWV's Avatar
    05-21-2016, 09:35 PM
    Oh, come on. Stop it with the fear-mongering. This is not genetically possible. What they're doing is taking stem cells and growing them into human organs in an unfamiliar environment. That does not enable the creature to actually reproduce with genes from that body part. You can't put an organ from one kind of an animal into another and expect it to inherit the ability to crossbreed with that animal, nor can you expect the mere existence of a foreign living body inside another creature's body to make any changes in the genetic makeup of its offspring. The DNA from a foreign organ doesn't just "leak" its way into an animal's reproductive system and change its genetic makeup. The genetic make up of the creature, despite having a sort of non-malignant tumor in its body, does not change... AT ALL. People who spout this crap are just gullible, fear-mongering idiots who latch onto it because they can somehow link it to their distrust of government. Not being a complete ignoramus, however, I know that this is not the gateway to some sort of freaky sci-fi world in which we're not entirely human because a human lung somehow sprouted the ability to force its way into another animal's gene pool by, I dunno, osmosis or some other sciency word I can't quite grasp the meaning of. Body parts, in and of themselves, play no part in the reproduction process because the information is already there, you know, in the reproductive system. The reproductive system of an organism doesn't just grab genetic information from all the separate parts, foreign or domestic, that happen to be present at the time and mash them all together. The corruption of a creature's physical make-up through artificial means in no way suggests that the creature's ingrained natural tendency to reproduce after its kind regardless of what may have happened to the creature during its lifetime is in any way compromised.
    10 replies | 451 view(s)
  • PaulConventionWV's Avatar
    05-21-2016, 09:11 PM
    I don't know, why don't you tell us? How would the world be if that were the case? Do you really know any more than the rest of us? Stop pretending like you know the answers. Nobody fights ALL the rules, but sometimes it is worth fighting them if an otherwise good organization is being corrupted by a couple of assholes. Now why don't you tell me, what would the world be like if we just bent over and took it all the time? Would that be a world you want to live in?
    14 replies | 340 view(s)
  • PaulConventionWV's Avatar
    05-21-2016, 09:06 PM
    Well, I'm glad you're happy with it, but some of us are a bit less complacent in our attitude toward the monstrosity that is the American justice system. I've seen the other side of the fence and I have no plans of going back. If it comforts you that your cage is a little bigger than a high-schooler's, then be my guest, but don't expect us all to just bend over and take it up the ass for the sake of your "society" when all it really is is a really big adult kindergarten where you can be killed or have your life ruined for breaking the rules.
    14 replies | 340 view(s)
  • PaulConventionWV's Avatar
    05-21-2016, 08:54 PM
    I think the problem is that it appears the rules actually didn't apply until his graduation day. The rule was never enforced and then suddenly they want the valedictorian to shave? Sorry, school bureaucrats, but you don't just get to change and enforce rules willy nilly. If I were him, I wouldn't cut off part of my face just to comply. And yes, it is part of his face, considering that's how people see him and know him. Going through such an important moment of your life with your tail between your legs is no way to live life. It would be a travesty to succumb to such idiotic rules and edicts such that you lose your identity in the process and are silently forced to become something that you're not for the sake of bending to the will of the establishment. Nope, not for me, thanks.
    14 replies | 340 view(s)
  • Cleaner44's Avatar
    05-21-2016, 06:53 PM
    What a great blueprint for other towns to copy!
    18 replies | 334 view(s)
  • Cleaner44's Avatar
    05-21-2016, 08:36 AM
    My post was supposed to say IRS budget. He could easily bomb the world, ban assault weapons and cut taxes at the same time. The key is to disregard deficits, the national debt and the constitution all at the same time. It has been done by every other president in my lifetime.
    64 replies | 918 view(s)
  • Cleaner44's Avatar
    05-20-2016, 11:55 PM
    I wish Trump would make a campaign promise to cut the budget by 75%. He would win in a landslide. If he did it our economy would BOOM!
    64 replies | 918 view(s)
  • Cleaner44's Avatar
    05-20-2016, 11:51 PM
    Hillary = Dishonestty
    5 replies | 229 view(s)
  • Cleaner44's Avatar
    05-20-2016, 08:27 PM
    Hillary will lose. If anyone disagrees, please take me up on a $10 bet. I am looking forward to collecting a few more bets.
    37 replies | 719 view(s)
  • Cleaner44's Avatar
    05-20-2016, 07:26 PM
    So they literally needed to create a law to stop using a word? Only the government could make things so complicated.
    14 replies | 281 view(s)
  • Cleaner44's Avatar
    05-19-2016, 08:35 AM
    You can't reason with addicts. These government workers are addicted to bloated paychecks for useless work.
    16 replies | 448 view(s)
  • Cleaner44's Avatar
    05-18-2016, 01:55 PM
    She definitely has plenty of reasons to lose all on her own. Even if she doesn't lose because of this, I have no doubt that she will lose. Even Democrats know she sucks. They only want to vote for her because they see her as the lesser evil. Only the super ignorant don't realize how dishonest and disgusting she is.
    32 replies | 617 view(s)
  • Cleaner44's Avatar
    05-18-2016, 01:40 PM
    When I was in my early 20s I thought the Clintons were good and didn't understand all of the complaining about them. A few decades later and I have to say that they disgust me. Voting for Bill in 1996 was the last time I voted for a Republicrat for president. I also voted for Bush over Dukakis in 1988. Now I see the Bushes and Clintons for the monsters that they are. Hilary deserves to lose for any one of hundreds of reasons. Could a candidate be any less moral?
    32 replies | 617 view(s)
  • Cleaner44's Avatar
    05-18-2016, 11:36 AM
    Obviously the public is quite aware that the Clintons have numerous scandals in their history. This could be different, as pedophilia is on a whole different level. Just look at the way Mika Brzezinski looks so defeated at the 4:46 and beyond part of the video. https://youtu.be/9S3gmnrHRnQ?t=4m46s She knows they won't be able to sweep this under the rug. Banging kids is something that a politician can't just laugh off. I just don't see how Hilary will be able to defend this. Bill cheating with adult women is one thing, but this goes way beyond that. I think that Trump's camp might have told these people on MSNBC that Trump would be bringing this up. Otherwise I don't think Hilary's friends at MSNBC would even be discussing it. It looks to me like they know Trump is going to open Pandora's box.
    32 replies | 617 view(s)
  • Cleaner44's Avatar
    05-18-2016, 08:45 AM
    It looks like Bill is sicker than I ever knew. He apparently flew with this guy on his pervert plane not 11 times like he was telling people, but actually 26 times. When you watch the MSNBC video, you can see the blond Democrat lady is completely defeated. Her body language screams that she thinks this will doom Hilary. Networks Ignore New Details of Bill Clinton’s Connections to Pedophile Epstein http://newsbusters.org/blogs/nb/nicholas-fondacaro/2016/05/17/networks-ignore-new-details-bill-clintons-connections MSNBC PANEL: TRUMP COULD CITE CLINTON’S ASSOCIATION WITH ELITE PEDOPHILE http://www.infowars.com/msnbc-panel-trump-could-cite-clintons-association-with-elite-pedophile/
    32 replies | 617 view(s)
  • Cleaner44's Avatar
    05-18-2016, 12:04 AM
    Word on the street is that a secret billionaire is going to pull Trump's campaign out of the ditch and propel him to victory.
    18 replies | 346 view(s)
  • Cleaner44's Avatar
    05-17-2016, 11:45 PM
    This is going to be very bad for HIlary when Trump starts smashing her in the face with the fact that Bill pals around with a pedophile. ĎMorning Joeí Panel: Clinton Connection With Billionaire Pedophile Jeffrey Epstein Will ĎBlow Upí Campaign http://www.breitbart.com/video/2016/05/16/morning-joe-panel-clinton-connection-with-billionaire-pedophile-jeffrey-epstein-will-blow-up-campaign/
    32 replies | 617 view(s)
  • PaulConventionWV's Avatar
    64 replies | 945 view(s)
More Activity

11 Visitor Messages

  1. View Conversation
    Could be why she hasn't popped in to pester me.
  2. View Conversation
    Double post
  3. View Conversation
    Whatever. You aren't worth an argument.

    Have a good life.
  4. View Conversation
    You honestly care about something as insignificant as reputation?

    Grow up.
  5. Please help me spread the word about Liberty Candidates United
  6. My twitter is @Cleaner4d4
    My email is cleaner44@gmx.us
  7. View Conversation
    Thanks for the Rep
  8. View Conversation
    I am still checking out your web site from time to time, so if you see a good deal, make a forum post. Thanks Cleaner!
  9. I am the creator of The Case For Ron Paul
    http://thecaseforronpaul.wordpress.com/
Showing Visitor Messages 1 to 10 of 11
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
About Cleaner44

Basic Information

About Cleaner44
Interests:
Freeeeeeeedom!
Occupation:
Online Marketing
Profile Sidebar Configuration

Profile Sidebar Configuration

Displayed city:
Phoenix, AZ
Displayed state:
Arizona
Displayed country:
USA
Activist Reputation (Self-Rated):
1
Select if you support the site's Mission.:
I support the site Mission. (This will change your user title to "Supporting Member".)
Display site reputation bars.:
Display site reputation bars.
Political Campaign Skills
Graphics:
Web Designer / Developer
Computer and Technical:
WebMaster, Telecommunication
Marketers:
Online Marketer

Signature


Regardless of any observations and opinions that I share about Donald Trump that fail to shred him, I am not a Trump voter and have no plans to be.

U.S. Air Force Veteran
@cleaner4d4

I am a libertarian. I am advocating everyone enjoy maximum freedom on both personal and economic issues as long as they do not bring violence unto others.

Statistics


Total Posts
Total Posts
7,095
Posts Per Day
2.28
Visitor Messages
Total Messages
11
Most Recent Message
03-18-2016 02:47 PM
General Information
Last Activity
Today 10:58 AM
Join Date
11-12-2007
Referrals
1
Home Page
http://atlasmarketingsolutions.com/

5 Friends

  1. CaseyJones CaseyJones is offline

    Member

    CaseyJones
  2. Live_Free_Or_Die Live_Free_Or_Die is offline

    Member

    Live_Free_Or_Die
  3. PaulConventionWV PaulConventionWV is offline

    Member

    PaulConventionWV
  4. playboymommy playboymommy is offline

    Member

    playboymommy
  5. Tink Tink is offline

    Member

    Tink
Showing Friends 1 to 5 of 5
View Cleaner44's Blog

Recent Entries

Foreign Aid to Israel puts the U.S. deeper in debt and is bad Foreign Policy

by Cleaner44 on 07-12-2011 at 11:47 PM
When the United States government gives foreign aid to any nation, it throws the concept of Fiscal Responsibility completely out the window.

The U.S. is deeply in debt and must continually borrow money from nations such as China just to operate on a daily basis. Borrowing money to give away to foreign nations that do not pay into our national treasury is fiscally irresponsible. Borrowing money to give to Israel is a heavy burden on the American taxpayer and we simply can not afford

Read More

Categories
Uncategorized

Fiscal Responsibility: Ron Paul vs. Mitt Romney

by Cleaner44 on 06-25-2011 at 04:00 PM
When it comes to the issue of fiscal responsibility both Ron Paul and Mitt Romney understand that the spending of the U.S. federal government is out of control. The annual budget deficits are leading to an ever increasing national debt that is unsustainable. The federal spending must be cut massively in order to balance the budget and that means massive cuts to the size of the federal government.

There are three steps that must be taken in order to get to a point of fiscal responsibility.

Read More

Categories
Uncategorized
No results to display...
Page 1 of 10 123 ... LastLast

05-24-2016


05-23-2016


05-22-2016


05-21-2016


05-18-2016


05-15-2016


05-13-2016


05-12-2016



Page 1 of 10 123 ... LastLast