LibertyEagle
Paleoconservative

:eyes: https://twitter.com/GadSaad/status/1786603345731309722 to: https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1786624683330380207

More "qualified immunity" shenanigans (and in this case, there already is "clearly established" case law, and it still didn't matter to these clowns in gowns): SWAT Raid on 'WRONG HOUSE!' Dragging Through the Courts https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YK9og5O8S1Q {Steve Lehto | 05 May 2024} And very well could end up in the Supreme Court.

THREAD: Rasmussen poll: 41 percent think civil war in US likely within 5 years

//

"All remaining airports close" ...

With extremely rare exceptions: no. No, they aren't. "Just Us"

Cops vs. Judge Drunk NY Judge Fights Angry Cops & Neighbors But The Prosecutor Will Not File Charges https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hWa3r0UCMTs {Nate The Lawyer | 06 May 2024} Four years after New York State Supreme Court Justice gets into fight with neighbors and cops, the state gives him a slap on the wrist.

Livestream in seven hours (6:30 PM EST): Super Mayor's First Board Meeting After FBI Subpoenas & Indictment https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KxEKDRBQoi4 {Nate The Lawyer | 06 May 2024} Dolton Village monthly board meeting with Mayor Tiffany Henyard and trustees after they hired Former Mayor Lightfoot. Grand Jury looking into claims of corruption.

Father, baby pistol-whipped during robbery, 3 men charged During the robbery, the men pointed a gun at the baby's head and threatened to kill him if his father didn't comply, police wrote. https://www.berkeleyscanner.com/2024/05/03/courts/berkeley-robbery-father-baby-pistol-whipped-men-charged/ {Emilie Raguso | 03 May 2024} Three men who fled from police in a stolen car after pistol-whipping a father and his baby during a robbery in Berkeley have been charged with multiple felonies, court papers show. One of the men ran across I-580 in an effort to evade a police officer who tackled him and took him into custody, according to court records. During the robbery, the men pointed a gun at the baby's head and threatened to kill him if his father didn't turn over his property, police wrote in court papers.

Some folks just like butt cheese sandwiches.

I know, right? I mean, the shuck-and-jive is entirely to be expected - but at least it's supposed to come with veneer of "we are Very Smart PeopleTM and we know what we're doing" slathered all over it. But this is just ... yikes!! WTAF?!

Anti-Semitism on the Campuses? The Tom Woods Show: Episode 2487 https://odysee.com/@TomWoodsTV:e/anti-semitism-on-the-campuses:5 {TomWoodsTV | 04 May 2024} The Libertarian Institute's Sheldon Richman joins us to talk about the encampments, who the students are, what it all means for American politics, and plenty more. Guest's Websites: The Libertarian Institute: https://libertarianinstitute.org Free Association (Substack): https://sheldonrichman.substack.com

The only mistake is that this wasn't already cross-posted to the Clown Show thread. As I said over there, it's a short-list contender for thread winner.

Corrupt "Super Mayor" RUNNING Scared https://odysee.com/@actualjusticewarrior:2/corrupt-super-mayor-running-scared:5 {Actual Justice Warrior | 04 May 2024} In this video I discuss the subpoenas demanding records from the "Super Mayor" Tiffany Henyard. Sources: Local News Report: https://youtu.be/J_RGInpWK0k Full Super Mayor Playlist: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLklYRErBEt_fh66U6iIlakqVGYz1cHanx

Short-list contender for thread winner: THREAD: Meet the Chair of the Council of Economic Advisors

//

Erich Honecker recommends barbed wire and machine gun nests. Ron Paul Says The Border Fence Built To Keep Us In https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=esp-ruhkZqQ {TPM TV | 08 September 2011} In Wednesday's GOP presidential debate Ron Paul (R-TX) suggested a fence along the U.S. Mexico border could be used to keep Americans in.

To be fair, "racism" (or "misogyny" / "homophobia" / "transphobia" / etc.) is not "any opinion a white person holds that differs from what the growing minority wants". Rather, "racism" (or "misogyny" / "homophobia" / "transphobia" / etc.) is any opinion anyone holds (regardless of their race, sex, etc.) that differs from what progressive leftists want. There are plenty of black "racists", gay "homophobes", and the like to be found out there in the real world (i.e., outside of academia, "woke" activism & punditry, corporate HR departments, and other such unsavory venues). Progressives will continue exploiting such accusations (for money and socio-political power) as long as enough people continue letting those accusations put them back on their heels . Piers' mistake was in trying to defend himself against the accusation. Instead, he should have just thrown it back in Cornel's face: "Yeah, okay, I'm a 'racist' . Whatever. So the fuck what?". Unless and until that kind of response (e.g., indifferent rejection) gains more social currency, progressives will continue abusing the concept of "racism" (or "misogyny" / "homophobia" / "transphobia" / etc.) to their advantage. Conservatives (ever the belated mimics of progressives) and establishment Democrats are getting in on the game, too - presently with "muh antisemitism" (though it doesn't seem to be working quite as well - they're not as well-practiced with employing the technique as progressives are).

"The more the merrier!!! It's gonna get IGNORANT tonight! But it's gonna be a lot of fun beating the hell out of the sh**heads once the sun goes down and nobody can tell us apart!!!"

Cops Give Protester a Beatdown, Plot Twist: He’s Actually An Undercover Cop https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9KbWUk5TfLM {Nate The Lawyer | 04 May 2024}

First, that does not make any sense. Police already have so-called "qualified immunity". There is no need to "give" it to them. They presently have it (and have had it for a long time now) by automatic default. It is only denied to them as a result of explicit court rulings in favor of motions filed specifically for the purpose of removing that immunity. (Thus, Trump cannot have been referring to "qualified immunity" - or else his reference to "giv" it to them was just meaningless rhetorical fluff intended to blow sunshine up the asses of ignorant "back the blue" cop-suckers who don't realize that cops already have such immunity.) Second, the description of "qualified immunity" as a "doctrine protects from personal liability unless they violate the law" is simply wrong - and obviously so. If a cop (or anyone else, for that matter) did not violate the law, then there is properly nothing for which to hold him personally liable. A cop (or anyone else, for that matter) is properly subject to liability if and only if he has, in fact, violated the law. The purpose and effect of "qualified immunity" is to void that liability when such violations occur. There is no point or purpose to granting immunity from the consequences of breaking the law to people who have not broken the law. The article cited by spudea has a better description of "qualified immunity":

oh ... my ... god ... :eek: ... :tears:

LOL @ the OP video being age-restricted by YouTube. Anyway ... all hail Gary! "Nerdrotic Goes Mainstream" - Fox News Reaction https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ceHztbZ4D6I {Geeks + Gamers | 03 May 2024}