• ThePaleoLibertarian's Avatar
    06-14-2017, 07:47 PM
    Yeah, they're a bunch of violent degenerate scum. But they're not a paramilitary. It might devolve into 1970s "Days of Rage" style terrorism (and arguably, already is), but they haven't the resources, the competence or the temperament to wage a revolutoonary campaign.
    94 replies | 1987 view(s)
  • ThePaleoLibertarian's Avatar
    06-14-2017, 07:15 PM
    I don't know if Conor McGregor is an idiot or a genius for taking this fight.
    3 replies | 135 view(s)
  • ThePaleoLibertarian's Avatar
    06-14-2017, 07:11 PM
    There might be rioting in that case, but a civil war is something else. The most violent group in the Trump era, by far, is Antifa. They're perfectly happy to "bash the fash" and hit people with bike locks and ancom flags when they live in cities like Berkeley (which is right near my hometown), where the police rarely hold them accountable for their actions and the mayor is on their side. That doesn't make them a paramilitary group. To say that they're unprepared for a civil war is a massive understatement. They're LARPers, academics who like the mystique of playing revolutionary on the weekends and the kudos they get from their fellow collective members, but they aren't warriors. I predict more leftist violence in the future, but this thing has a ceiling unless there's an incoming depression of apocalyptic proportions.
    94 replies | 1987 view(s)
  • ThePaleoLibertarian's Avatar
    06-14-2017, 06:52 PM
    They cast one side as a fascist, a Nazi, Hitler, Voldemort, Darth Vader and Sauron. They cast the other as "the resistance", the rebels, the noble strugglers against tyranny. It is not at all surprising that a narrative like that leads to violence. This is the first shooting and the first major act of violence outside of the Antifa-nexus, and it likely won't be the last.
    310 replies | 7118 view(s)
  • ThePaleoLibertarian's Avatar
    06-14-2017, 06:24 PM
    The concept of a "cold civil war" is an interesting one and something I've been mulling over for the past year or so. I don't think it'll turn hot unless the massive number of consumerist distractions is limited for some reason or we reach some Malthusian limit on resources. A post-industrial society waging a civil war is something I have to see to believe.
    94 replies | 1987 view(s)
No More Results

8 Visitor Messages

  1. View Conversation
    Just took a quick look here: http://neorxn.com/introduction/ I'm intrigued to keep looking. I'm disappointed that he tries to tie theonomists in with kinists, a lot of theonomists view kinists as heretics (not that I expect you to care as a non-Christian, just sayin' )
  2. View Conversation
    Ethno-nationalists are one of the biggest problems in the theonomy movement, BTW. Most non-kinist theonomists tend to ban kinists (ethnonationalists) from the theonomy movement. I'm told they're more dangerous than they're willing to admit to in public.

    Good stuff, BTW. I'll take a look.
  3. As for which blogs, Mencius Moldbug's Unqualified Reservations is probably the best place to start, if you can handle his seemingly endless verbosity. He' the Neoreactionary Marx (in terms of scope and influence), so it's best to start at the beginning. I'd also recommend Nick Land, Michael Anissimov and Vox Day. The Right Stuff has some good writers, but they dip into antisemitism far too frequently for my liking; I am pro-Christian and pro-Jew (t least in some cases).
  4. The other two wings are techno-futurism and ethno-nationalism. Admittedly, this is something of a simplification. You could break them down into different groups, and debate where one group ends and another begins, and who belongs in which camp. It is a pretty decent description of the biggest trends in NRx though. I'm of the techno-futurist persuasion, with some flavor from the other camps thrown in for good measure. Here's a more complex breakdown of the major Dark Enlightenment players:

  5. View Conversation
    And yes, I hate modernity as well

    Do you have any particular blog you'd recommend?
  6. View Conversation
    What are the other two wings, just out of curiosity?


    1. Yes, you could leave for any reason.

    2. I would. I can't speak for anyone else. THough admittedly there is the question of how big it would have to be exactly. If you had one random household say they "secede" but they're engaging in homosexuality I would think they could be punished. If they want to start their own society the next county over, be my guest. Most recons are decentralizationists and I am too.

    3. Unfortunately if enough people conspire its hard to do anything, but there is a law allowing you to challenge a witness and if the witness is actually a liar they receive whatever penalty they wanted for you. But its true that if both witnesses and court are corrupt I don't know what could be done. I want to learn more about this.
  7. View Conversation
    Honestly, from what I remember from your posts you're probably closer to what I believe than most other people here. You'd probably want to run a different type of society in part of what we now know as "The United States" which I'm fine with. I've only briefly read on Neoreactionary but from what I've read I'm pretty much in line with the general idea. And a lot of people at the supposed ultra-conservative Patrick Henry College DO NOT like my positions... oddly both for being too authoritarian and too libertarian at the same time.
  8. View Conversation
    OK, so if you can actually find a quote (not a wikipedia article that doesn't actually quote him) saying that Gary North wants to stone people just for being unbelievers or that he wants to impose a global theocracy by force (key distinction, believing a global theocracy will eventually come about BY EVANGELISM is obviously very different) let me see the quote so I can denounce him. I definitely don't support that, and I don't know of any other theonomist that does either.
Showing Visitor Messages 1 to 8 of 8
About ThePaleoLibertarian

Basic Information

Profile Sidebar Configuration

Profile Sidebar Configuration

Activist Reputation (Self-Rated):
1

Signature


NeoReactionary. Anarcho-Feudalist.

The counter-revolution will not be televised.

Traditionalism is the most revolutionary ideology of our times.

-Julius Evola

Statistics


Total Posts
Total Posts
2,475
Posts Per Day
2.68
Visitor Messages
Total Messages
8
Most Recent Message
09-02-2015 05:37 PM
General Information
Last Activity
06-20-2017 03:34 AM
Join Date
12-10-2014
Referrals
0

6 Friends

  1. Christian Liberty
  2. DFF DFF is offline

    Banned

    DFF
  3. PaleoPaul PaleoPaul is offline

    Member

    • Send a message via MSN to PaleoPaul
    • Send a message via AIM to PaleoPaul
    • Send a message via Yahoo to PaleoPaul
    PaleoPaul
  4. South Park Fan South Park Fan is offline

    Member

    South Park Fan
  5. susano susano is offline

    Member

    susano
  6. TommyJeff TommyJeff is offline

    Member

    TommyJeff
Showing Friends 1 to 6 of 6

07-10-2016


06-10-2016


Page 1 of 23 12311 ... LastLast

06-14-2017


05-08-2017


05-07-2017


05-06-2017


05-04-2017


05-03-2017


05-02-2017


04-23-2017


04-22-2017



Page 1 of 23 12311 ... LastLast