Root
Member

Not gloating brother, just stating what appears to be the fact. Affluent White Female Urban Liberal - AWFUL

I always thought it was rigged for the following main reasons (there are plenty of other forms of circumstantial evidence in my opinion, but I wanted to keep it brief): - COVID-19 became an issue right after the (first) impeachment failure and resulted in the push for mail-in ballots without a trustworthy chain-of-custody. I think that COVID-19 was intentionally released and overblown to sway the election, among other goals (such as further strangling the middle class). - The "red mirage" article was a primer to explain the fraud to the public. - Before the 2020 election, I had assumed that they might not control elections outright (or else Trump wouldn't have won in 2016) but could probably tilt the scales using key urban districts within key swing states where the Democrats hold power, especially since they can wait for the rural areas to report their totals first, and this is exactly what happened. I think that they sniffed their own farts again so underestimated Trump's performance as in 2016, so the baked in fraud that is normal, not to mention the additional mail-in ballots, was insufficient which made them slow roll the steal to buy time. They were also coy about officially calling the election since they wanted to ensure that all of their ducks were in a row. - The hardcore censorship of "election deniers" was something that never even happened with 9/11 "conspiracy theorists." - The attack against political opponents following the election steal. - The lack of election security because they don't want election security for the obvious reason.

Usually it's "AWFL," which stands for Affluent White Female Liberal.

If 47 percent of wite wimmenz are voting kamala country is in deep sit

LOL. I'll be honest. I didn't read through the entire article. I got everything I wanted from the headline. I did see this looking back at it. Mexico elected a female president. Pakistan chose a female prime minister — in 1988. There are, or have been, women elected as heads of state and government in Honduras, Turkey, India, Bangladesh, the Philippines, Guyana, Ireland, Britain, Israel and Germany. Throw a dart anywhere on a world map and she’s there, or has been there, leading nations and governments that Americans often label as inferior or intolerant. From the perspective of those who see Trump as a danger to democracy, this election marks an incredibly dark turn for our nation. I won’t cry “fraud” or “vote-rigging” — that’s a MAGA thing. But I will blame some of my sorrow over the outcome of this election on Karens. These women weren’t hiding their vote for Harris from their Trump-loving husbands. They were hiring a supervisor who understands entitlement. Note when name women elected to head of state she did not mention Margaret Thatcher. I wonder why?

You were right. I was wrong. I admit it. What's an "AWFUL?"

:rolleyes: No it doesn't! I actually had access to death records doing medical research. You have no idea what you're talking about. Yes you have to be careful with the records, but a researcher working under an IRB can get access. And on top of that, how do you think state's attorneys general are able to purge records of dead people? You don't think Trump could find a single Republican AG in the entire country to look into this?

No comparison! A marine is taught the rear naked choke as a part of his lethal hand to hand training program. See: You can't compare a freak accident to ways a particular person has been specifically trained to kill in a particular way.

Looks like the Puerto Rican roast joke had no negative impact either. So, what the Marxists tried to do is win a national election with three constituencies: black women, AWFULs and queeers.

From the perspective of those who see Trump as a danger to democracy Achieving a political victory by more people voting for your candidate is now a danger to democracy? Do these people even listen to themselves? And if that is not "democracy" then what is it they are talking about? (Yes, I know these are rhetorical questions...)

https://letmegooglethat.com/?q=How+researchers+are+able+to+access+confidential+death+records

I'm going by the stat, not by the article. Supposedly white women were going to break hard for Kamala Harris over abortion. That just didn't happen.

Hmmm....

It's irrelevant to the question of why were there more votes overall. We're not talking about the run of the mill, someone voted in New York and then voted in Florida. We're talking about 10 million that (maybe) didn't vote in 2024 who "voted" in 2020. And I say "maybe" because as someone else pointed out, votes are still being added to the tally. While these are not swing states and can't change the electoral vote they could change the popular vote. https://letmegooglethat.com/?q=how+to+obtain+death+records+for+reearch

On moral grounds I sympathize far more than Daniel Penny than I do George Zimmerman or Kyle Rittenhouse. On legal grounds Zimmerman and Rittenhouse had stronger arguments. Was the chokehold on for 15 minutes or under 2 minutes? That's the question for me.

And she thinks Kamala "Willie Brown's Mistress" Harris is "scandal free." I don't agree with her analysis. But the facts are all so obvious. Michelle Obama and Kamala Harris trying to make this election about abortion didn't win the white woman vote.

Very good point. I didn't think of that.

If your "process" is to cheat, it's impossible to elimiate all vulnerabilities of getting caught. The "Let's through up our hands and pretend we can't do anything but look at the raw numbers of voter participation between elections and ignore the very real circumstances that can explain the difference in the numbers and just yell voter fraud" argument is not sound.

Cross reference the 10 million with death certificates. If you find a significant number were dead prior to 2020, there you go. You've actually made this easier not harder to check. As for elderly people, they are the ones most likely to have legitimately voted abstentee. Ummm....NO! There's absolutely no reason for someone to lie about this. But say if someone does? It's impossible for there to be 10 million people who didn't vote but knew ahead of time that they needed to lie and say that they did vote. So say 50% lie. That's still 5 million people that will say "No I didn't vote in 2020" when the records show they did. Okay. So take 20% of the 50% and you still have 2 million people that should say "I don't remember voting in 2020" and you can go from there.

Yes. And there was universal mail in voting in 2020. And Democrats took advantage and voted from home. Republicans by and large did not. Hence the spike.

:rolleyes: The explanation is there was general anger in the country and voting was made easier than ever before through universal mail in voting. I've already explained how if there is actual fraud that could easily be proven by making phone calls to the people who, according to the records, voted in 2020 but not 2024. But I get it. If people actually took the time to verify the conspiracy theory and were wrong then it would go away and that wouldn't be as fun.

Of course. But... I already explained how to check this. All states keep records of who votes in every election. And they have to give you that information. That's how polsters come up with their "likely voter" lists, how candidates get signatures for ballot access, and how parties determine who's a "bona fide" democrat or republican. (In Tennessee anyway the GOP determines that if you voted in the last 3 GOP primaries.) So using that list you can contact voters who, according to the records, voted in 2020 and not 2024 and simply ask them "Did you vote in 2020?" If there was ballot stuffing of people who were on the rolls but didn't vote that will show up. It's not like 10 million people who votes were cast for them without their knowledge or consent will be clued in to lie and say "Oh yeah. I voted in 2020" when they really didn't.

Well, neither Tucker Carlson nor Joe Rogan pushed Trump on Operation Warp Speed, so I doubt anyone will actually hold Trump accountable.

Non story in the "OMG it MUST be voter fraud" variety. :rolleyes: So all of those other times when voter turnout was even HIGHER there MUST have been voter fraud? Because that's basically the argument. Let's just ignore all other possible explanations other that "the election was stolen" without any attempt at checking the voter rolls first and doing a survey of voters who, according to the rolls, voted in 2020 but not 2024 and see if anything shakes out. :rolleyes: Maybe, just maybe, if you make it super easy to mail in vote, more people vote.

I particularly appreciated their inclusion of the highly relevant dead-bear-cub and barbecued-dog angles of the issue.

Did he ever give an update on why he didn't prosecute Hillary Clinton? Was he just joking? Maybe he'll do things differently now that he's been prosecuted himself though.