Even if we disregard the CONstitutionalist POV and only accept anarchism(my preference, in all disclosure), there would still exist the concept of private property. Do you think the typical private property owner would be okay with trespassers, foreign or domestic? I highly doubt it, as property owners are normally rationally self-interested and thus do not want trespassers on their property. Even the more "liberal" anarchists accept the importance and legitimacy of property boundaries. (See "Boundaries Of Order" https://mises.org/library/boundaries-order-private-property-social-system by Schaffer and "Privatization Of Roads And Highways" by Block https://mises.org/library/privatization-roads-and-highways)
Hey dannno Syria is a "terrorist" country isn't it? So Trump has gone from "No Muslims", to "No Muslims from terrorist countries", to "We gotta help Syrian refugees." But, this isn't a "flip-flop" right?
Ron's been critical of a NAU for as long as we have been a forum or longer. It's been discussed many times since 2007....
Yeah we are at permanent stagnation until the next down turn . Last time , the employment situation was worse than The Great Depression when at that time there were about 5 people for ea job . Last downturn there were 6 for ea job for a long time . Only 6 in 10 Americans work and that number will not rise. The tax revenue will not ever equal the budget so the debt is added to continually . The currency will become a crisis at some point , when I have no idea . This in the present form will not last forever.
THERE IS TRUTH IN THIS. THE PROBLEM WITH THIS COMPARISON IS THAT IN THE HUMID AREAS, THE TEMPERATURE COOL SIGNIFICANTLY IN THE LATE AFTERNOON/EVENING. HERE THE HEAT REMAINS IN THE AIR ALL NIGHT-ESPECIALLY IN PAVED AREAS-THESE BECOME "HEAT ISLANDS". :(
Yup. These same type vehicles were pictured in route from a plant in Texas last year and caused a stir.