Yesterday, 09:04 PM
Yeah, definitely need to have a third option in the debates. Only thing that bothers me is that the establishment single party that has traditionally functioned under the illusion of two parties has basically expanded to a single party functioning as three by way of the Libertarian party this cycle after witnessing those historic Independent and third party turnouts during the 2014 Mid-Term. So while it's good to see a third option, it doesn't help the cause of liberty if that third participant is just going to run with the single party narrative.
Remember that moderators control the terms of controversy in these debates. End of the day, if the only questions being asked of them are with regard to acknowledging which one has the more publicly appealing means of sending men from the government with guns to force us how to think and tell us what to do, then, there really isn't much difference.