CaptUSA
Member

Glad to hear you’re doing well, brother. I hope that continues indefinitely for you. I agree with you. I’ve been finding real life pursuits to be much more gratifying and fulfilling as well. I plan to be devoting a LOT more of mybtime and efforts in that area from here on out. Give me a shout sometime.

LOL. I'll be honest. I didn't read through the entire article. I got everything I wanted from the headline. I did see this looking back at it. Mexico elected a female president. Pakistan chose a female prime minister — in 1988. There are, or have been, women elected as heads of state and government in Honduras, Turkey, India, Bangladesh, the Philippines, Guyana, Ireland, Britain, Israel and Germany. Throw a dart anywhere on a world map and she’s there, or has been there, leading nations and governments that Americans often label as inferior or intolerant. From the perspective of those who see Trump as a danger to democracy, this election marks an incredibly dark turn for our nation. I won’t cry “fraud” or “vote-rigging” — that’s a MAGA thing. But I will blame some of my sorrow over the outcome of this election on Karens. These women weren’t hiding their vote for Harris from their Trump-loving husbands. They were hiring a supervisor who understands entitlement. Note when name women elected to head of state she did not mention Margaret Thatcher. I wonder why?

You were right. I was wrong. I admit it. What's an "AWFUL?"

:rolleyes: No it doesn't! I actually had access to death records doing medical research. You have no idea what you're talking about. Yes you have to be careful with the records, but a researcher working under an IRB can get access. And on top of that, how do you think state's attorneys general are able to purge records of dead people? You don't think Trump could find a single Republican AG in the entire country to look into this?

No comparison! A marine is taught the rear naked choke as a part of his lethal hand to hand training program. See: You can't compare a freak accident to ways a particular person has been specifically trained to kill in a particular way.

:rolleyes: Tired trope. We get it. No need to spam every thread with the same crap. We know you think voting is the devil.

I would like to see a breakdown between married women and unmarried/divorced women. I mean, the democrats were actually out there encouraging married women to lie to their husbands. (seriously think about that for a minute. They wanted women to deceive their own families for their own power.)

https://letmegooglethat.com/?q=How+researchers+are+able+to+access+confidential+death+records

I'm going by the stat, not by the article. Supposedly white women were going to break hard for Kamala Harris over abortion. That just didn't happen.

Could it be that women are individual people?!! And some of them make decisions that differ from yours?! Nah, gotta be Karens

It's irrelevant to the question of why were there more votes overall. We're not talking about the run of the mill, someone voted in New York and then voted in Florida. We're talking about 10 million that (maybe) didn't vote in 2024 who "voted" in 2020. And I say "maybe" because as someone else pointed out, votes are still being added to the tally. While these are not swing states and can't change the electoral vote they could change the popular vote. https://letmegooglethat.com/?q=how+to+obtain+death+records+for+reearch

On moral grounds I sympathize far more than Daniel Penny than I do George Zimmerman or Kyle Rittenhouse. On legal grounds Zimmerman and Rittenhouse had stronger arguments. Was the chokehold on for 15 minutes or under 2 minutes? That's the question for me.

And she thinks Kamala "Willie Brown's Mistress" Harris is "scandal free." I don't agree with her analysis. But the facts are all so obvious. Michelle Obama and Kamala Harris trying to make this election about abortion didn't win the white woman vote.

Very good point. I didn't think of that.

If your "process" is to cheat, it's impossible to elimiate all vulnerabilities of getting caught. The "Let's through up our hands and pretend we can't do anything but look at the raw numbers of voter participation between elections and ignore the very real circumstances that can explain the difference in the numbers and just yell voter fraud" argument is not sound.

Cross reference the 10 million with death certificates. If you find a significant number were dead prior to 2020, there you go. You've actually made this easier not harder to check. As for elderly people, they are the ones most likely to have legitimately voted abstentee. Ummm....NO! There's absolutely no reason for someone to lie about this. But say if someone does? It's impossible for there to be 10 million people who didn't vote but knew ahead of time that they needed to lie and say that they did vote. So say 50% lie. That's still 5 million people that will say "No I didn't vote in 2020" when the records show they did. Okay. So take 20% of the 50% and you still have 2 million people that should say "I don't remember voting in 2020" and you can go from there.

Yes. And there was universal mail in voting in 2020. And Democrats took advantage and voted from home. Republicans by and large did not. Hence the spike.

:rolleyes: The explanation is there was general anger in the country and voting was made easier than ever before through universal mail in voting. I've already explained how if there is actual fraud that could easily be proven by making phone calls to the people who, according to the records, voted in 2020 but not 2024. But I get it. If people actually took the time to verify the conspiracy theory and were wrong then it would go away and that wouldn't be as fun.

I thought you didn't trust RFK and he was a snake working to undermine your idol???

Exactly! I used to design business processes for a living... In those processes, you identify vulnerabilities and eliminate them wherever possible. If it's not possible to eliminate them, you establish controls and reporting on any time a control has been triggered. And then you test it. If the outcomes don't make sense, you reexamine the process for unidentified vulnerabilities. Rinse/repeat. If you can't validate your process, you can't validate the result. Which is the way they want it.

I recently had the best day of my life, thank you my friend. Personal projects are coming up roses for me. I only hope you're doing as well yourself. That's so much more rewarding than receiving an infraction for pointing out that someone is repeating the message of all the shills himself, even as he is allowed to call you and me and all our friends moles with impunity. The irrational exuberance is depressing, too. For example, RFKJr. isn't in the cabinet for DHHS yet, or even at the head of the FDA. Trump has four years to execute a softer coup than I predicted. And if the way you're treating bad news as media misinformation is any gauge, nobody is going to hold the man's feet to the fire on any of his promises. Again.

Of course. But... I already explained how to check this. All states keep records of who votes in every election. And they have to give you that information. That's how polsters come up with their "likely voter" lists, how candidates get signatures for ballot access, and how parties determine who's a "bona fide" democrat or republican. (In Tennessee anyway the GOP determines that if you voted in the last 3 GOP primaries.) So using that list you can contact voters who, according to the records, voted in 2020 and not 2024 and simply ask them "Did you vote in 2020?" If there was ballot stuffing of people who were on the rolls but didn't vote that will show up. It's not like 10 million people who votes were cast for them without their knowledge or consent will be clued in to lie and say "Oh yeah. I voted in 2020" when they really didn't.

//

Well, neither Tucker Carlson nor Joe Rogan pushed Trump on Operation Warp Speed, so I doubt anyone will actually hold Trump accountable.

Non story in the "OMG it MUST be voter fraud" variety. :rolleyes: So all of those other times when voter turnout was even HIGHER there MUST have been voter fraud? Because that's basically the argument. Let's just ignore all other possible explanations other that "the election was stolen" without any attempt at checking the voter rolls first and doing a survey of voters who, according to the rolls, voted in 2020 but not 2024 and see if anything shakes out. :rolleyes: Maybe, just maybe, if you make it super easy to mail in vote, more people vote.

See, this is why we HATE the corporate press... This may be accurate, but we'd have ZERO way to tell from these anonymous sources. In fact, the whole article seems like a ruse to sow discord in the transition team.