Tab Content
More Activity

35 Visitor Messages

  1. View Conversation
    O I C
  2. View Conversation
    Say wut? I didn't get what you wrote there.
  3. View Conversation
    I forgive you.
  4. View Conversation
    just so you know, when a thread is started in the guest subforum (even by a member) it has to be approved before its publicly seen, so Yes I Am A Liberal is telling the truth
  5. View Conversation
    Since when is the "We got a badass over here" meme "gay"? It's been all over the interwebz for many moons and it's used by all sorts of folks. There are several samples in the various "bestest picture thread evarrr"-s.
  6. The reason I have no use for monarchies is it's complete pot luck what you get. If your generation gets a Victoria, you could be in worse shape (assuming her advisors aren't lying to her about what they're doing), but if you get an Ivan the Terrible you're screwed. I prefer a system that at least holds out hope for nonviolent revolution, whether people are generally smart enough to use it or not.

    And I'm pretty sure you meant neither Bismarck nor the kaiser.

    Chancellor von Bismarck
    President von Hindenburg
  7. Bismarck

    That help get the rust out of your history? 'Cause those who get rusty on history are liable to re-live the bad parts...
  8. View Conversation
    You're right, I should have said the Kaiser, not Bismarck. :/ (My WWI history is rather rusty...I do remember Hitler suffered from mustard gas inhalation during that war and a bunch of other factoids) Yeah, monarchs have been somewhat fascist in certain occasions, but they always had incentive not to destroy their subjects' economy or their own respective societies as presidents and prime ministers or even legislators do. (such elected officials almost always leave office very wealthy and almost never face justice for their misdeeds) Generally speaking, the best to worst scale goes- voluntary association with government>hereditary monarchy>monarchy>classical republicanism>modern constitutionalism>democracy etc.
  9. View Conversation
    "Can you not see that he's talking monarchy" (per your rep message) No, he was talking about National Socialism. Hitler was not a monarch at all. He nationalized industry and introduced a sort of fascism to Germany. If you read Hitler, he had no intention of taking the responsibility of a monarch. He was in fact critical of Bismarck, who was closer to a monarch than Hitler. (though he did try to stay in Otto's good graces while he was alive)
  10. View Conversation
    Glad I could help you out on that trebuchet thang
Showing Visitor Messages 1 to 10 of 35
Page 1 of 4 123 ... LastLast
Page 1 of 4 123 ... LastLast
About acptulsa

Basic Information

Profile Sidebar Configuration

Profile Sidebar Configuration

Activist Reputation (Self-Rated):


Quote Originally Posted by acptulsa View Post
'I favor the policy of economy, not because I wish to save money, but because I wish to save people. The men and women of this country who toil are the ones who bear the cost of the government. Every dollar we carelessly waste means that their life will be so much the more meager. Every dollar that we prudently save means that their life will be so much the more abundant. Economy is idealism in its most practical form.'--Calvin Coolidge


Total Posts
Total Posts
Posts Per Day
Visitor Messages
Total Messages
Most Recent Message
11-11-2014 06:28 PM
General Information
Last Activity
11-15-2015 08:38 AM
Join Date

37 Friends

  1. angelatc angelatc is offline

    Deadly amount of toxicity

  2. asimplegirl asimplegirl is offline


  3. AxXiom AxXiom is offline


  4. brandon brandon is offline


  5. Brick-in-the-Wall
  6. cajuncocoa cajuncocoa is offline

    ★ ★ ★ ★ ★

  7. CapitalistSooner CapitalistSooner is offline

    New Member

  8. CaseyJones CaseyJones is offline


  9. cheapseats cheapseats is offline


  10. Deborah K Deborah K is offline


    Deborah K
Showing Friends 1 to 10 of 37
Page 1 of 4 123 ... LastLast
View acptulsa's Blog

Recent Entries

We're So Lucky to Have Such Great Choices

by acptulsa on 09-23-2012 at 11:16 AM
Quote Originally Posted by acptulsa View Post
I just can't decide who to vote for in the presidential race. They're both just so perfect! I can't believe it. Things are just going so well I never considered firing the president, but this Romney guy is just such a temptation!

Romney promises us more war. Obama promised us just the opposite, but that's ok, because he saw Dubya's two wars and raised us three police actions. I think that's a wonderful thing, and can't wait for the next one. I heard somewhere that with six you

Read More


Intercity Passenger Rail

by acptulsa on 09-23-2012 at 11:14 AM
Quote Originally Posted by acptulsa View Post
Once upon a time, there was a thing called the Interstate Commerce Commission. It was founded to prevent kamikaze capitalism amongst railroads in a day when their efficiencies and primitive technology pretty much guaranteed them a monopoly in viable transportation.

The best thing Reagan did, in my opinion, and the one time I felt some hope for a moment that he would prove to be the libertarian he claimed to be, was when he abolished this bureau. But it was a decade too late to save

Read More


Who are you mad at really?

by acptulsa on 06-26-2011 at 09:29 AM
Quote Originally Posted by acptulsa View Post
'What your daddy did to you was abuse.'

'How dare you talk that way about my daddy?!'

What has it to do with politics? Everything. Politicians piss us off, then try to misdirect our anger 'across the aisle' to people who are fundamentally exactly the same, but wear a different party label. The game is age old, but still works.

People are angry, but they are often in denial about it. They know they're angry, but they don't want to admit they're angry

Read More