Results 1 to 18 of 18

Thread: UFC Fighter Moicano says to read Mises

  1. #1

    UFC Fighter Moicano says to read Mises



    and

    I am the current Champion of "The Dallas Cowboys will win the NFC, Pick'em Contest" and you are not



  2. Remove this section of ads by registering.
  3. #2
    2 hours later...



    https://twitter.com/SpinninBackfist/...64803787571651
    "He's talkin' to his gut like it's a person!!" -me
    "dumpster diving isn't professional." - angelatc
    "You don't need a medical degree to spot obvious bullshit, that's actually a separate skill." -Scott Adams
    "When you are divided, and angry, and controlled, you target those 'different' from you, not those responsible [controllers]" -Q

    "Each of us must choose which course of action we should take: education, conventional political action, or even peaceful civil disobedience to bring about necessary changes. But let it not be said that we did nothing." - Ron Paul

    "Paul said "the wave of the future" is a coalition of anti-authoritarian progressive Democrats and libertarian Republicans in Congress opposed to domestic surveillance, opposed to starting new wars and in favor of ending the so-called War on Drugs."

  4. #3
    The Bastiat Collection · FREE PDF · FREE EPUB · PAPER
    Frédéric Bastiat (1801-1850)

    • "When law and morality are in contradiction to each other, the citizen finds himself in the cruel alternative of either losing his moral sense, or of losing his respect for the law."
      -- The Law (p. 54)
    • "Government is that great fiction, through which everybody endeavors to live at the expense of everybody else."
      -- Government (p. 99)
    • "[W]ar is always begun in the interest of the few, and at the expense of the many."
      -- Economic Sophisms - Second Series (p. 312)
    • "There are two principles that can never be reconciled - Liberty and Constraint."
      -- Harmonies of Political Economy - Book One (p. 447)

    · tu ne cede malis sed contra audentior ito ·

  5. #4
    https://twitter.com/moicanoufc/statu...30458742047106


    https://twitter.com/SteadyxDecline/s...37425099792716


    Economic Policy: Thoughts for Today and Tomorrow (aka the "Six Lessons")
    https://mises.org/library/book/econo...y-and-tomorrow
    {Mises Institute | undated}

    This might be Mises's best-selling book. It is a very clear explanation of the basics of economic policy: private property, free trade, exchange, prices, interest, money and inflation, socialism, fascism, investment, and much more. As Mises discusses each topic, he addresses the many merits of market institutions and the dangers of intervention.

    These chapters were originally delivered as lectures in Argentina in 1959, at the University of Buenos Aires, and later written up in prose. Mises had urged Argentina to turn from dictatorship and socialism toward full liberty, so there is a special urgency behind the cool logic employed here. The book's continued popularity is due to its clarity of exposition on the ways in which economic policy affects everyone.

    It is a very good text for undergraduates studying economic policy, and for anyone who wants to gain a fundamental understanding of the interaction between market forces and government intervention.

    HTML (web): https://mises.org/online-book/econom...y-and-tomorrow
    PDF: https://cdn.mises.org/Economic%20Pol...Tomorrow_3.pdf
    EPUB: https://cdn.mises.org/Economic%20Pol...omorrow_3.epub
    PAPER: https://store.mises.org/Economic-Pol...rrow-P207.aspx
    Last edited by Occam's Banana; 04-15-2024 at 02:59 AM.

  6. #5
    Renato Moicano: "If You Care About Your...Country, Read Ludwig von Mises."
    https://mises.org/mises-wire/renato-...dwig-von-mises
    {Tho Bishop | 14 April 2024}

    Last night, Brazilian fighter Renato Moicano went viral after his victory over Jalin Turner at UFC 300, giving a shout-out to Ludwig von Mises himself.

    'I love America, I love the Constitution...I want to carry...guns. I love private property. Let [me tell] you something. If you care about your...country, read Ludwig von Mises and the six lessons of the Austrian economic school.

    The full clip is available here, with some colorful adult language included [1].

    Moicano's endorsement of Mises is a credit to the growing Austrian economics movement in Brazil, which has not only enjoyed success within universities and the political system but also culturally. Despite the imposition of socialist president Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva, and the extreme crackdown on free speech being imposed on the nation through the court system, as highlighted by Elon Musk and journalists on X [see this thread - OB], the Menos Marx, Mais Mises ["Less Marx, More Mises"] movement that captivated Brazilian politics in 2016 continues to bear fruits.

    Increasingly, MMA has become an arena for free thinkers to push back against progressive ideology across the globe. The UFC was among the first major brands to push against covid tyranny, and a number of its fighters have utilized their podiums for political messages that go against corporate-approved narratives. None, however, are as subversive as promoting the wisdom unique to Mises and the Austrian school.

    Moicano doubled down on his message on X after the fight.
    The "Six Lessons" Moicano references is the book Economic Policy by Mises, which was one of his most successful popular books. Republished in Brazil as Six Lessons, Economic Policy covers important topics such as capitalism, socialism, inflation, and more.

    You can read the book that inspired Moicano for free at this link [see this post - OB].



    [1] https://twitter.com/ChristianMalaza/...12869198467447
    Last edited by Occam's Banana; 04-14-2024 at 01:01 PM.

  7. #6
    Quote Originally Posted by Occam's Banana View Post
    https://twitter.com/moicanoufc/statu...30458742047106


    https://twitter.com/SteadyxDecline/s...37425099792716


    Economic Policy: Thoughts for Today and Tomorrow (aka "Six Lessons of Mises")
    https://mises.org/library/book/econo...y-and-tomorrow
    {Mises Institute | undated}

    This might be Mises's best-selling book. It is a very clear explanation of the basics of economic policy: private property, free trade, exchange, prices, interest, money and inflation, socialism, fascism, investment, and much more. As Mises discusses each topic, he addresses the many merits of market institutions and the dangers of intervention.

    These chapters were originally delivered as lectures in Argentina in 1959, at the University of Buenos Aires, and later written up in prose. Mises had urged Argentina to turn from dictatorship and socialism toward full liberty, so there is a special urgency behind the cool logic employed here. The book's continued popularity is due to its clarity of exposition on the ways in which economic policy affects everyone.

    It is a very good text for undergraduates studying economic policy, and for anyone who wants to gain a fundamental understanding of the interaction between market forces and government intervention.

    HTML (web): https://mises.org/online-book/econom...y-and-tomorrow
    PDF: https://cdn.mises.org/Economic%20Pol...Tomorrow_3.pdf
    EPUB: https://cdn.mises.org/Economic%20Pol...omorrow_3.epub
    PAPER: https://store.mises.org/Economic-Pol...rrow-P207.aspx
    Just finished reading it. As Moicano said, everyone should read this. A casual reader can finish it in a couple of afternoons. If you're a fast reader or this is familiar ground, you can finish it in an afternoon. Excerpt from the last chapter:

    It is certainly true that in the second century A.D., the Roman Empire nur-
    tured a very flourishing civilization, that in those parts of Europe, Asia, and
    Africa in which the Roman Empire ruled, there was a very high civilization.
    There was also a very high economic civilization, based on a certain degree
    of division of labor. Although it appears quite primitive when compared with
    our conditions today, it certainly was remarkable. It reached the highest
    degree of the division of labor ever attained before modern capitalism. It is
    no less true that this civilization disintegrated, especially in the third
    century. This disintegration within the Roman Empire made it impossible for
    the Romans to resist aggression from without. Although the aggression was no
    worse than that which the Romans had resisted again and again in the preceding
    centuries, they could withstand it no longer after what had taken place within
    the Roman Empire.

    What had taken place? What was the problem? What was it that caused the
    disintegration of an empire which, in every regard, had attained the highest
    civilization ever achieved before the eighteenth century? The truth is that
    what destroyed this ancient civilization was something similar, almost
    identical to the dangers that threaten our civilization today: on the one hand
    it was interventionism, and on the other hand, inflation. The interventionism
    of the Roman Empire consisted in the fact that the Roman Empire, following the
    preceding Greek policy, did not abstain from price control. This price con-
    trol was mild, practically without any consequences, because for centuries it
    did not try to reduce prices below the market level.

    But when inflation began in the third century, the poor Romans did not yet have
    our technical means for inflation. They could not print money; they had to de-
    base the coinage, and this was a much inferior system of inflation compared to
    the present system, which— through the use of the modern printing press—can so
    easily destroy the value of money. But it was efficient enough, and it brought
    about the same result as price control, for the prices which the authorities
    tolerated were now below the potential price to which inflation had brought the
    prices of the various commodities.

    The result, of course, was that the supply of foodstuffs in the cities
    declined. The people in the cities were forced to go back to the country and to
    return to agricultural life. The Romans never realized what was happening.
    They did not understand it. They had not developed the mental tools to
    interpret the problems of the division of labor and the consequences of
    inflation upon market prices. That this currency inflation, currency debase-
    ment, was bad, this they knew of course very well.

    Consequently, the emperors made laws against this movement. There were laws
    preventing the city dweller from moving to the country, but such laws were
    ineffective. As the people did not have anything to eat in the city, as they
    were starving, no law could keep them from leaving the city and going back into
    agriculture. The city dweller could no longer work in the processing indus-
    tries of the cities as an artisan. And, with the loss of the markets in the
    cities, no one could buy anything there anymore.

    Thus we see that, from the third century on, the cities of the Roman Empire
    were declining and that the division of labor became less intensive than it
    had been before. Finally, the medieval system of the self-sufficient
    household, of the "villa," as it was called in later laws, emerged.

    Therefore, if people compare our conditions with those of the Roman Empire and
    say: "We will go the same way," they have some reasons for saying so. They can
    find some facts which are similar. But there are also enormous differences.
    These differences are not in the political structure which prevailed in the
    second part of the third century. Then, on the average of every three years, an
    emperor was assassinated, and the man who killed him or had caused his death
    became his successor. After three years, on the average, the same happened to
    the new emperor. When Diocletian, in the year 284, became emperor, he tried
    for some time to oppose the decay, but without success.

    There are enormous differences between present-day conditions and those that
    prevailed in Rome, in that the measures that caused the disintegration of the
    Roman Empire were not premeditated. They were not, I would say, the result of
    reprehensible formalized doctrines.

    In contrast, however, the interventionist ideas, the socialist ideas, the
    inflationist ideas of our time, have been concocted and formalized by writers
    and professors. And they are taught at colleges and universities., You may
    say: "Today's situation is much worse." I will answer: "No, it is not worse."
    It is better, in my opinion, because ideas can be defeated by other ideas.
    Nobody doubted, in the age of the Roman emperors, that the government had the
    right and that it was a good policy to determine maximum prices. Nobody
    disputed this.

    But now that we have schools and professors and books that recommend this, we
    know very well that this is a problem for discussion. All these bad ideas from
    which we suffer today, which have made our policies so harmful, were developed
    by academic theorists.
    And now you understand why the globalists are pushing so hard for censorship. They cannot win the debate, and they have built the entire modern political order on the promise that they won't knee-cap people merely for disagreeing with them. Thus, their only option that doesn't involve removing the mask and showing themselves for the criminal network of thugs they truly are, is to censor all logical arguments that expose their lies. Chief among these are the Gospel, and Austrian economic theory...
    Last edited by ClaytonB; 04-14-2024 at 09:01 PM.
    Jer. 11:18-20. "The Kingdom of God has come upon you." -- Matthew 12:28

  8. #7
    I don't pay much attention to the UFC but it's nice to know there's some in the business that are pretty based.
    "Perhaps one of the most important accomplishments of my administration is minding my own business."

    Calvin Coolidge

  9. #8



  10. Remove this section of ads by registering.
  11. #9

  12. #10
    https://twitter.com/saifedean/status...17802614399288
    to: https://twitter.com/saifedean/status...02295245541473


    Quote Originally Posted by Occam's Banana View Post
    [...]

    Economic Policy: Thoughts for Today and Tomorrow (aka the "Six Lessons")
    https://mises.org/library/book/econo...y-and-tomorrow
    {Mises Institute | undated}

    This might be Mises's best-selling book. It is a very clear explanation of the basics of economic policy: private property, free trade, exchange, prices, interest, money and inflation, socialism, fascism, investment, and much more. As Mises discusses each topic, he addresses the many merits of market institutions and the dangers of intervention.

    These chapters were originally delivered as lectures in Argentina in 1959, at the University of Buenos Aires, and later written up in prose. Mises had urged Argentina to turn from dictatorship and socialism toward full liberty, so there is a special urgency behind the cool logic employed here. The book's continued popularity is due to its clarity of exposition on the ways in which economic policy affects everyone.

    It is a very good text for undergraduates studying economic policy, and for anyone who wants to gain a fundamental understanding of the interaction between market forces and government intervention.

    HTML (web): https://mises.org/online-book/econom...y-and-tomorrow
    PDF: https://cdn.mises.org/Economic%20Pol...Tomorrow_3.pdf
    EPUB: https://cdn.mises.org/Economic%20Pol...omorrow_3.epub
    PAPER: https://store.mises.org/Economic-Pol...rrow-P207.aspx

  13. #11
    https://twitter.com/moicanoufc/statu...62386980303046


    https://twitter.com/alfredohinny/sta...27675729973578

  14. #12
    Renato Moicano Cares About His Country More Than Sohrab Ahmari
    https://odysee.com/@mises:1/renato-m...-his-country:b
    {Mises Media | 18 April 2024}

    On this episode of Radio Rothbard, Ryan McMaken and Tho Bishop discuss Renato Moicano's viral Mises moment and the backlash it received from pundit Sohrab Ahmari.

    Discussed on the Show:

    "Six Graphs Showing Just How Much the Government Has Grown" by Ryan McMaken: https://Mises.org/RR_182_A
    "Why You Should Read Ludwig von Mises" by Tho Bishop: https://Mises.org/RR_182_B
    "Mises Against the Neoliberals" by Ryan McMaken: https://Mises.org/RR_182_C


  15. #13

  16. #14
    THREAD: What Are Mises’s Six Lessons?

    Quote Originally Posted by PAF View Post
    By Jonathan Newman
    Mises.org
    April 20, 2024

    Ludwig von Mises’s Economic Policy: Thoughts for Today and Tomorrow has become quite popular recently. The Mises Book Store has sold out of its physical copies, and the PDF, which is available online for free, has seen over 50,000 downloads in the past few days.

    This surge in interest in Mises’s ideas was started by UFC fighter Renato Moicano, who declared in a short post-fight victory speech, “I love America, I love the Constitution…I want to carry…guns. I love private property. Let me tell you something. If you care about your…country, read Ludwig von Mises and the six lessons of the Austrian economic school.”

    The “six lessons” he is referring to is Mises’s book, Economic Policy: Thoughts for Today and Tomorrow, which was republished by our friends in Brazil under the title “As Seis Lições” (“The Six Lessons”).

    If you are interested in what Mises has to say in this book, which is a transcription of lectures he gave in Argentina in 1959, here’s a brief preview, which I hope inspires you to read the short book in full. As a side note, if you are an undergraduate student who is interested in these ideas, the Mises Institute’s next Mises Book Club is on this text (pure coincidence!).

    Lecture One: Capitalism

    Mises begins his first lecture with an overview of the development of capitalism out of feudalism. Businesses began “mass production to satisfy the needs of the masses” instead of focusing on producing luxury goods for the elite. These big businesses succeeded because they served the needs of a larger group of people, and their success wholly depended on their ability to give this mass of consumers what they wanted.

    Despite the amazing and undeniable increases in standards of living, even for a growing population, capitalism had its detractors, including Karl Marx, who gave capitalism its name. Mises says that while Marx hated capitalism and that Marx dubbed it thusly as an attack on the system, the name is a good one

    because it describes clearly the source of the great social improvements brought about by capitalism. Those improvements are the result of capital accumulation; they are based on the fact that people as a rule, do not consume everything they have produced, that they save—and invest—a part of it.

    Prosperity is the result of providing for the future—more precisely it is the result of setting aside consumption today by saving and investing resources in production. Mises says that this principle explains why some countries are more prosperous than others. When it comes to economic growth, “there are no miracles.” There is only “the application of the principles of the free market economy, of the methods of capitalism.”

    Lecture Two: Socialism

    In the second lecture, Mises takes a closer look at Marx’s proposed system: socialism. Economic freedom means that people can choose their own careers and use their resources to accomplish their own ends. Economic freedom is the basis for all other freedoms. For example, when the government seizes whole industries, like that of the printing press, it determines what will be published and what won’t and the “freedom of the press disappears.”

    Mises acknowledges that there is no such thing as “perfect freedom” in a metaphysical sense. We must obey the laws of nature, especially if we intend to use and transform nature according to our ends. And even economic freedom means that there is a fundamental interdependence among individuals: “Freedom in society means that a man depends as much on other people as other people depend upon him.” This is also true for big businesses and the entrepreneurs who lead them. The true “bosses” in the market economy are not those who shout orders to the workers, but the consumers.

    Socialists despise the idea of consumer sovereignty because it means allowing mistakes. In their mind, the state should play the paternalistic role of deciding what is good for everyone. Thus Mises sees no difference between socialism and a system of slavery: “The slave must do what his superior orders him to do, but the free citizen—and this is what freedom means—is in a position to choose his own way of life.” In capitalism, this freedom makes it possible for people to be born into poverty but then achieve great success as they provide for their fellow man. This kind of social mobility is impossible under systems like feudalism and socialism.

    Mises ends this lecture with a short explanation of the economic calculation critique of socialism. When the private ownership of the means of production is prohibited, then economic calculation is made impossible. Without market prices for factors, we cannot economize production and provide for the needs of the masses, no matter who oversees the socialist planning board. The result is mass deprivation and chaos.

    Lecture Three: Interventionism

    Interventionism describes a situation in which the government “wants to interfere with market phenomena.” Each intervention involves an abrogation of the consumer sovereignty Mises had explained in the two previous lectures.

    The government wants to interfere in order to force businessmen to conduct their affairs in a different way than they would have chosen if they had obeyed only the consumers. Thus, all the measures of interventionism by the government are directed toward restricting the supremacy of consumers.

    Mises gives an example of a price ceiling on milk. While those who enact such an intervention may intend to make milk more affordable for poorer families, there are many unintended consequences: increased demand, decreased supply, non-price rationing in the form of long queues at shops that sell milk, and, importantly, grounds for the government to intervene in new ways now that their initial intervention has not achieved its intended purpose. So, in Mises’s example, he traces through the new interventions, like government rationing, price controls for cattle food, price controls for luxury goods, and so on until the government has intervened in virtually every part of the economy, i.e., socialism.

    After providing some historical examples of this process, Mises gives the big picture. Interventionism, as a “middle-of-the-road policy,” is actually a road toward totalitarianism.

    Lecture Four: Inflation

    There can be no secret way to the solution of the financial problems of a government; if it needs money, it has to obtain the money by taxing its citizens (or, under special conditions, by borrowing it from people who have the money). But many governments, we can even say most governments, think there is another method for getting the needed money; simply to print it.

    If the government taxes citizens to build a new hospital, then the citizens are forced to reduce their spending and the government “replaces” their spending with its own. If, however, the government uses newly printed money to finance the construction of the hospital, then there is no replacement of spending, but an addition, and “prices will tend to go up.”

    Mises, per usual, explodes the idea of a “price level” that rises and falls, as if all prices change simultaneously and proportionally. Instead, prices rise “step by step.” The first receivers of new money increase their demands for goods, which provides new income to those who sell those goods. Those sellers may now increase their demands for goods. This explains the process by which some prices and some people’s incomes increase before others. The result is a “price revolution,” in which prices and incomes rise in a stepwise fashion, starting with the origin of the new money. In this way, new money alters the distribution of incomes and the arrangement of real resources throughout the economy, creating “winners” and “losers.”

    The gold standard offers a strict check against the inflationist tendencies of governments. In such a system, the government cannot create new units of money to finance its spending, so it must resort to taxation, which is notably unpopular. Fiat inflation, however, is subtle and its effects are complex and delayed, which makes it especially attractive to governments that can wield it.

    In this lecture Mises also executes a thorough smackdown of Keynes and Keynesianism, but I’ll leave that for readers to enjoy.

    Lecture Five: Foreign Investment

    Mises returns to a principle he introduced in the first lecture, that economic growth stems from capital accumulation. The differences in standards of living between countries is not attributable to technology, the qualities of the workers, or the skills of the entrepreneurs, but to the availability of capital.

    One way that capital may be accumulated within a country is through foreign investment. The British, for example, provided much of the capital that was required to develop the rail system in the United States and in Europe. This provided mutual benefit for both the British and the countries on the receiving end of this investment. The British earned profits through their ownership of the rail systems and the receiving countries, even with a temporary “unfavorable” balance of trade, obtained the benefits of the rail system including expanded productivity which, over time, allowed them to purchase stock in the rail companies from the British.

    Foreign investment allows the capital accumulation in one country to speed up the development of other countries, all without a one-sided sacrifice on the part of the country providing the investment. Wars (especially world wars), protectionism, and domestic taxation destroy this mutually beneficial process. When countries impose tariffs or expropriate the capital that belongs to foreign investors, they “prevent or to slow down the accumulation of domestic capital and to put obstacles in the way of foreign capital.”

    Lecture Six: Politics and Ideas

    The classical liberal ideas of the philosophers of the eighteenth and early-nineteenth centuries helped create the constrained governments and economic freedom that led to the explosion of economic growth Mises discussed in the first lecture. But the emergence of minority “pressure groups,” what we would call “special interest groups” today, directed politicians away from classical liberal ideals and toward interventionism. The groups that would benefit from various interventions lobby the government to grant them favors like monopoly privileges, taxes on competition (including tariffs), and subsidies. And, as we have seen, this interventionist spiral tends toward socialism and totalitarianism. The “resurgence of the warlike spirit” in the twentieth century brought about world wars and exacerbated the totalitarian trends even in the once exemplary nations.

    The concomitant rise in government expenditures made fiat money and inflation too tempting. The wars and special projects advocated by the pressure groups were expensive, and so budget constraints were discarded in favor of debasement.

    This, Mises says, explains the downfall of civilization. He points to the Roman Empire as an example:

    What had taken place? What was the problem? What was it that caused the disintegration of an empire which, in every regard, had attained the highest civilization ever achieved before the eighteenth century? The truth is that what destroyed this ancient civilization was something similar, almost identical to the dangers that threaten our civilization today: on the one hand it was interventionism, and on the other hand, inflation.

    Mises finds hope in the fact that the detractors of economic freedom, like Marx and Keynes, do not represent the masses or even a majority. Marx, for example, “was not a man from the proletariat. He was the son of a lawyer. … He was supported by his friend Friedrich Engels, who—being a manufacturer—was the worst type of ‘bourgeois,’ according to socialist ideas. In the language of Marxism, he was an exploiter.”

    This implies that the fate of civilization depends on a battle of ideas, and Mises thought that good ideas would win:

    I consider it as a very good sign that, while fifty years ago, practically nobody in the world had the courage to say anything in favor of a free economy, we have now, at least in some of the advanced countries of the world, institutions that are centers for the propagation of a free economy.

    May we continue Mises’s project and fulfill his hope. What the world needs is “Menos Marx, Mais Mises.”



    Note: The views expressed on Mises.org are not necessarily those of the Mises Institute.

    https://www.lewrockwell.com/2024/04/...s-six-lessons/

  17. #15
    UFC's Renato Moicano and Mises' Six Lessons
    The Tom Woods Show: Episode 2483
    https://odysee.com/@TomWoodsTV:e/ufc...ses'-six:6
    {TomWoodsTV | 26 April 2024}

    UFC fighter Renato "Money" Moicano recently told a national audience that if they want to save their country they should read Ludwig von Mises and the "six lessons" of the Austrian School. Jonathan Newman joins us to discuss those lessons.

    Article Discussed: https://mises.org/power-market/what-...ss-six-lessons [see this post - OB]


  18. #16
    "Forgive me for being deeply uninterested in what "CNN" has to say about Austrian school economics." -- Jeff Deist

    For those who are at least mildly curious (it's actually not that bad, CNN-wise - my biggest gripe is that the piece doesn't hyperlink to any of the sources it cites):

    Renato Moicano: Why a Brazilian UFC star is championing a dead Austrian economist
    https://edition.cnn.com/2024/04/28/a...tam/index.html
    {David Shortell | 28 April 2024}

    Brazilian UFC fighter Renato Moicano had just rallied back from an early-round beating to win a lightweight bout this month when he grabbed a mic to shout out his favorite economist.

    “I love private property and let me tell you something, if you care about your country, read Ludwig von Mises and the six lessons of the Austrian economic school,” Moicano, his cheekbone bloodied, roared, along with a pair of profanities.

    Footage of the mixed martial artist’s tribute soon went viral on social media, where many in the United States were quick to comment on the seemingly bizarre incongruity of the scene.

    But for those with their fingers on the pulse of Latin American politics, it likely appeared far less surprising. Because in South and Central America, the Austrian-American laissez-faire champion Mises, who died in 1973, is having something of a moment.

    In recent years, the free-market economist and the contrarian Austrian school he led midcentury have been turned into a hashtag deployed by tax-wary workers. A rash of think tanks and media influencers who champion his ideas have consolidated his influence. And in El Salvador and Argentina, Mises’ ideas have made their way into the speeches and policies of presidents.

    “Ludwig von Mises is Latin America’s leading economist,” declared the headline of a Bloomberg opinion piece earlier this month by economist Tyler Cowen.

    The one-time principal economic adviser to the Austrian government, Mises fled his homeland in 1934 to escape the growing Nazi reach, eventually settling in the US, where he became a professor at New York University. His free-market policy prescriptions, framed by an economic thinking centered on human behavior and individual choice, were widely considered out of fashion at the time.

    But his strident rejection of socialism has found a foothold in places like Brazil, where a “Less Marx, More Mises” movement has swelled over the past 15 years in a backlash to the ruling center left party, propelled by the growth of social media and a series of corruption scandals, according to Camila Rocha, a political scientist and researcher at the Brazilian Center of Analysis and Planning.

    The movement is especially popular among young male students and low-income workers such as Uber drivers and street vendors “who started feeling and thinking like entrepreneurs” and “don’t want to pay taxes anymore,” she said. Moicano has said he began studying economics after facing taxes on his first UFC winnings.

    In 2015, the “Less Marx, More Mises” slogan [see this thread - OB] made its way onto the posters brandished by protesters in Brazil’s massive right-wing demonstrations, which foreshadowed the rise of former President Jair Bolsonaro, who would later embrace the libertarian flank.

    From Mises to Milei

    Today, many experts believe the Austrian school may have no greater sway than in Buenos Aires, where President Javier Milei, himself a libertarian economist, retweeted a viral clip of Moicano’s rant.

    After reading Mises for the first time, Milei felt “superlative conceptual clarity,” he recalled in a 2017 interview. “Milei considers Mises to be among the greatest economists in history,” said Daniel Raisbeck, a policy analyst at the libertarian Cato Institute.

    Since taking office in December, the wild-haired leader has pushed for wide deregulation. While many of his proposals have been blocked by the country’s congress, his government achieved fiscal parity this year with a robust and controversial set of cuts, including shutting down the Argentina national press agency and reducing aid to soup kitchens.

    Milei’s elimination of rent controls and price controls could be interpreted as harking back to Mises, Raisbeck said, pointing to the Austrian’s thinking that “freely determined prices provide the vital information without which economic calculation becomes impossible.”

    But the idea has also been espoused by free market economists outside the Austrian school, like Milton Friedman, (after whom one of Milei’s dogs is named), Raisbeck said.

    Instead, Raisbeck said, Mises’s fingerprints might be clearest in Milei’s anti-socialist rhetoric, like his January speech before the World Economic Forum in Davos, where he argued the West had to be wrested back from leaders “co-opted by a vision of the world that inexorably leads to socialism and thereby to poverty.”

    Mises-watchers also see strands of the economist’s thinking in the policies pushed by El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, another buzzy right-winger upending the Latin American political scene.
    Last edited by Occam's Banana; 04-29-2024 at 08:40 AM.



  19. Remove this section of ads by registering.
  20. #17
    Renato Moicano: Why a Brazilian UFC star is championing a dead Austrian economist
    Gee, thanks so much for that, CNN. Now shall we delve into why you're championing a dead German malcontent named Marx?

  21. #18



Similar Threads

  1. A New, Easy-to-Read Explanation of Mises's Human Action
    By Suzanimal in forum Books & Literature
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 08-05-2016, 09:29 AM
  2. How to Read Mises
    By Occam's Banana in forum Austrian Economics / Economic Theory
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 02-16-2014, 09:14 PM
  3. Mises.tv live stream lecture right now! (Mises.org circle in Huston)
    By hazek in forum Austrian Economics / Economic Theory
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 01-14-2012, 02:19 PM
  4. LIVE Mises University Lectures streaming at Mises.org!!!
    By Nate-ForLiberty in forum Austrian Economics / Economic Theory
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 07-28-2011, 03:09 PM
  5. Best Von Mises book to read?
    By Shellshock1918 in forum Books & Literature
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 10-08-2007, 01:56 AM

Select a tag for more discussion on that topic

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •