We must divide and conquer

[Delivered4000]

It's in our interest to diffuse the establishment vote as much as possible. That means we should not attack candidates that have 10% like perry\bachmann for example, but attack Gingrich to move him back down to 15% from 23%. Remember, Establishment republicans like to vote for a winner, this means they are affected by who's the front runner and will vote for someone that can win.

That's what the Establishment tries to do when it fakes a poll with a frontrunner way up there. It's to condense support into one candidate so they can guarantee he'll win.

Example (Establishment candidates vs. Ron paul)

E.C 48%
R.P 25%
E.C 15%
E.C 8%
E.C 5%
E.C 3%


Vs.


R.P 25%
E.C 20%
E.C 18%
E.C 15%
E.C 10%
E.C 5%

[wgadget]

Thus the current "2-man race," which is a lie.

[brooks009]

Thx for posting this. This really is the key to us winning.

[Xenophage]

Yes, we do need to help dilute the vote so that no one candidate is way out front. However, this will become increasingly difficult to do as the primary process continues. Eventually Ron Paul has to be winning majorities.

[tbone717]

I actually think this last debate might have done that for us. Perry did a lot better than in the past, which may bring him some Newt support. Same with Bachmann, though to a lesser degree.

[Delivered4000]

Yes, we do need to help dilute the vote so that no one candidate is way out front. However, this will become increasingly difficult to do as the primary process continues. Eventually Ron Paul has to be winning majorities.

You're right. I guess I should say in the first 4 states maybe

[cdc482]

We still have a long way to go to 25%