• Anti Federalist's Avatar
    Yesterday, 10:03 PM
    https://x.com/NatCon2022/status/1802462713123311813 1802462713123311813
    2182 replies | 167064 view(s)
  • Anti Federalist's Avatar
    Yesterday, 10:02 PM
    https://x.com/NatCon2022/status/1802464041220120959 1802464041220120959
    2182 replies | 167064 view(s)
  • Anti Federalist's Avatar
    Yesterday, 09:24 PM
    https://x.com/iamyesyouareno/status/1802310598299971838 1802310598299971838
    652 replies | 75796 view(s)
  • Anti Federalist's Avatar
    Yesterday, 09:18 PM
    https://x.com/EndWokeness/status/1802388913488597271 1802388913488597271
    0 replies | 42 view(s)
  • Anti Federalist's Avatar
    Yesterday, 09:14 PM
    https://x.com/iamyesyouareno/status/1802284815258931657 1802284815258931657
    89 replies | 2522 view(s)
  • Anti Federalist's Avatar
    Yesterday, 08:52 PM
    But this has everything to do with the government. The same families suing are the same families that became mouthpieces for gun control, possibly the most hotly contested "political" argument there is.
    35 replies | 987 view(s)
  • PAF's Avatar
    Yesterday, 08:47 PM
    What, 24/7/365? Will he have that amount of time to listen to him? And/or will he take Rand's advice 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 30% of the time?
    41 replies | 4460 view(s)
  • PAF's Avatar
    Yesterday, 08:42 PM
    Yes, according to me. I don't subscribe to "Fair Share" commie philosophy. Even if you do :rolleyes: Did you know that one can balance a budget of $10,000 the same way that one can balance a budget of $500 Trillion?
    5 replies | 115 view(s)
  • Occam's Banana's Avatar
    Yesterday, 08:28 PM
    THREAD: Trump Bans Bump Stocks
    41 replies | 4460 view(s)
  • Occam's Banana's Avatar
    Yesterday, 08:24 PM
    You see, if the law is clear, then people might know what it is. And if people know what the law is, then they might try to get around it. So to prevent that, the law needs to be vague and inscrutable to anyone who isn't a government bureaucrat. That way, government bureaucrats will be free to decide if and when to apply it "on a case-by-case basis".
    541 replies | 45326 view(s)
  • PAF's Avatar
    Yesterday, 08:16 PM
    Even aside from the "Fair Share" garbage, it's garbage.
    5 replies | 115 view(s)
  • Occam's Banana's Avatar
    Yesterday, 08:13 PM
    https://x.com/shannonrwatts/status/1801975437381316721 They're coping and seething and seething and coping ... The Group Helping the Supreme Court Rewrite America’s Gun Laws Is Worse Than the NRA https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2024/06/supreme-court-nra-gun-laws-bump-stocks.html {Dahlia Lithwick & Mark Joseph Stern | 15 June 2024}
    541 replies | 45326 view(s)
  • Occam's Banana's Avatar
    Yesterday, 07:50 PM
    "The opinion was written by Justice Thomas" https://x.com/gunpolicy/status/1801621025093788144 :cool: FPCGear.com https://x.com/gunpolicy/status/1802375575253692640
    541 replies | 45326 view(s)
  • Occam's Banana's Avatar
    Yesterday, 07:24 PM
    Corrupt "Super Mayor" ATTACKS Children https://odysee.com/@actualjusticewarrior:2/corrupt-super-mayor-attacks-children:c {Actual Justice Warrior | 15 June 2024} In this video I discuss the "Super Mayor" taking revenge on the Park's District that she has had a long standing dispute with. Sources: Local Segment On Auto Show: https://youtu.be/DBk5vKtffkI New Segment: https://youtu.be/fKKscy64jvM
    56 replies | 4017 view(s)
  • PAF's Avatar
    Yesterday, 07:12 PM
    Oh, the "Fair Share" BBA again :nauseated: By Publius Huldah Why the “Balanced Budget Amendment” is a Hoax – and a Deadly Trap You can not responsibly support a proposed Amendment to Our Constitution unless you have read and understand the proposal and how it would change our Constitution. You must look behind the nice sounding name! Will the Balanced Budget Amendment (BBA) really “rein in” the federal government? Will it really “show them” that they have to balance their budget the same as we do?
    5 replies | 115 view(s)
  • Occam's Banana's Avatar
    Yesterday, 06:48 PM
    Jones' willful disobedience of court orders may justify the making of a default judgement against him, but it doesn't justify the egregious degree of the damages awarded after that default judgement was rendered (especially if they end up including Jones' social media accounts - see below). And in any case, whatever the degree of damages (whether egregious or not), they are supposed to represent liability incurred for defamation, not liability incurred for disobeying the court (which liability was already accounted for in the making of the default adverse judgement). So, no - any egregiousness of the awarded damages is not warranted by Jones' disobedience, the proper remedy for which, depending on the kind and manner of disobedience, is something along the lines of "contempt of court" or, in the limit, adverse judgement by default (which is what happened in this case). If they are so concerned about recovering damages from Jones, then why are they trying to deprive Jones of his ability to "promote new business ventures"? It makes absolutely no sense to seek to recover damages by imposing conditions that are explicitly specified to be for the purpose of delimiting Jones' ability to exercise a means of earning the resources required to be able to pay those damages. Pray tell, how does deliberately impairing Jones' ability to "promote new business ventures" redound to the benefit of the plaintiffs or of their chances of recovering damages? And of what possible value are Jones' social media accounts, anyway, if they are no longer owned or controlled by Jones? I wouldn't be surprised if just the mundane and routine legal costs involved in depriving Jones of ownership and transferring it to someone else are more than the accounts are even worth without Jones behind them. Such a process appears to be aimed, not at compensating the plaintiffs for damages, but at applying a surreptitious kind of "prior restraint" by impeding or preventing the defendant's ability to publish anything at all (including things having nothing at all to do with the original defamation). It's like suing an old-fashioned newspaper for defamation, and then, after winning the suit, demanding that ownership of the newspaper be granted to the plaintiffs (or the state) in order to "deplatform" the publisher. But at least in the case of an old-fashioned newspaper, the physical plant of the newspaper would at least continue to be worth something significant even if ownership was seized and transferred. That is not the case for Jones' social media accounts, the seizure of which seems to be motivated by the desire to punitively silence him, and little or nothing more (it certainly won't serve to help make the plaintiffs whole in any significant way). And what is to happen if, after seizing Jones' social media accounts, Jones simply creates new ones (which will, of course, end up being more valuable than the seized ones, by virtue of the fact that they will be Jones')? Are such new accounts then to be seized as well, under the same justifications? If not, then what is the point of having seized his previous accounts (which would now be of little if any value)? If so (which seems must be the case, if the justifications for the previous seizures are to be accepted), then how would that not dovetail perfectly with the claim that "hey won't stop until Jones' 1st Amendment rights are taken away" (your reply to which is still a non sequitur), whether one actually believes that claim or not? Jones being held liable for defamation does not in any way obviate (and is not mutually exclusive of) a deliberate attempt to exploit that holding of liability as a means of squelching Jones (especially given the feds' self-admitted proclivity for "nudging" things in the direction they desire).
    35 replies | 987 view(s)
  • TheTexan's Avatar
    Yesterday, 06:12 PM
    Zelenskyy is basically the highest paid US employee of all time
    6 replies | 178 view(s)
  • TheTexan's Avatar
    Yesterday, 01:08 PM
    They didn't want to throw a pony in there for good measure?
    6 replies | 178 view(s)
  • PAF's Avatar
    Yesterday, 11:50 AM
    1802176863554392203 https://x.com/dylanmallman/status/1802176863554392203?s=46
    11 replies | 1221 view(s)
  • PAF's Avatar
    Yesterday, 11:19 AM
    by Kyle Anzalone June 14, 2024 The Russian leader said there could be an immediate pause to hostilities. Russian President Vladimir Putin laid out four conditions for Ukraine that he said would lead to an immediate ceasefire and, ultimately, an end to the conflict. According to the Kremlin, Kiev’s neutral, non-aligned, non-nuclear status and the lifting of all Western sanctions are necessary conditions for ending the conflict. In a speech to the Russian Foreign Ministry on Friday, Putin said that if Ukraine withdraws its forces from the four regions annexed by Moscow – Luhansk, Donetsk, Zaporizhzhia, and Kherson – then he would order a halt to operations and begin negotiations to end the war.
    6 replies | 178 view(s)
  • CCTelander's Avatar
    Yesterday, 10:41 AM
    “You must spread some Reputation around …” You struck a chord here, brother.
    71581 replies | 1730358 view(s)
  • PAF's Avatar
    Yesterday, 10:37 AM
    If Biden wins, will it be because “stolen election”? If Trump wins, will it be because “stolen election”?
    2 replies | 406 view(s)
  • acptulsa's Avatar
    71581 replies | 1730358 view(s)
  • PAF's Avatar
    Yesterday, 09:40 AM
    PAF replied to a thread War is Gay in Grassroots Central
    As we both know, that's the whole entire point of walls and entry points; it funnels them for processing. It only benefits the government while we get to pay for it all. God forbid if anybody escapes being a government-owned subject "asset".
    95 replies | 32101 view(s)
  • acptulsa's Avatar
    Yesterday, 09:39 AM
    So... As far as you're concerned, that's a yes?
    35 replies | 987 view(s)
  • acptulsa's Avatar
    Yesterday, 09:31 AM
    acptulsa replied to a thread War is Gay in Grassroots Central
    I thought I remembered hearing about that passing. Only thing is, I don't know how the Director is going to make sure he got all of them registered. Does he spend his days at the southern border where the NGOs are shipping them on the taxpayer dime?
    95 replies | 32101 view(s)
  • PAF's Avatar
    Yesterday, 09:24 AM
    PAF replied to a thread War is Gay in Grassroots Central
    Actually that's not true: ``Sec. 3. (a)(1) Except as otherwise provided in this title, every male citizen of the United States, and every other male person residing in the United States, between the ages of eighteen and twenty-six, shall be automatically registered under this Act by the Director of the Selective Service System.
    95 replies | 32101 view(s)
  • acptulsa's Avatar
    Yesterday, 09:08 AM
    Well, that's the disconnect, isn't it? Does a lack of hard proof really compel citizens to embrace naivete?
    35 replies | 987 view(s)
  • PAF's Avatar
    Yesterday, 08:26 AM
    Anti Federalist , isn't it amazing, that now these "let's pretend we are republicans" are fully advocating citizen-to-IRS accountability and "everybody must pay their fair share". He even snuck in "uni-party" as if he isn't one of them :tears: I remember a time when immigrants would come in to work for a wage based on employee/employer contract rights, even under the table, and then go home off-season, until "Republicans" got mad that they weren't "paying their fair share" and "Funding the Fed". Regarding signing up to "vote" with Driver "Licenses" even though the workers are not engaged in "interstate commerce", consider it Blow-Back caused by government intervention and people embracing it .
    212 replies | 33422 view(s)
  • acptulsa's Avatar
    71581 replies | 1730358 view(s)
More Activity

19 Visitor Messages

  1. View Conversation
    To be fair to NC, if you've got nothing to bring, you might as well congratulate yourself for nothing. lol
  2. View Conversation
    Thanks for the +rep. Sorry to hear about your wife's cancer. :'( I'll be praying for y'all. If you don't mind, what's her first name? I'll mention it to my priest and the parish will keep y'all in thought and prayer. ~hugs~ (PM if you aren't comfortable sharing info here)
  3. View Conversation
    Thanks for the +rep man. 'Twas fun pwning Trav tonight. ttyl. Believe it or not, I actually got a +rep from Josh on that thread.
  4. View Conversation
    Dude, sorry about last night. I ended up drifting off to sleep while watching tv.
  5. View Conversation
    Yup... I still feel that way.
  6. Yeah, Clay, I feel ya man. But don't hit it TOO hard man. All that's likely to result is a ban for you. Nothing's gonna change otherwise, and this place would be much less fun without you.
  7. View Conversation
    Gotta love how the mods of this forum +rep trolls and do their bidding, so long as they are trolling anarchists, lol.
  8. View Conversation
    Hey bro, how's business?
  9. View Conversation
    Hey, In this vid Stef brings up an interesting idea. He calls it "flip it". It's a method of debating with minarchists. I hope you find it useful.
Showing Visitor Messages 1 to 10 of 19
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
About CCTelander

Basic Information

Profile Sidebar Configuration

Profile Sidebar Configuration

Activist Reputation (Self-Rated):
1
Display site reputation bars.:
Display site reputation bars.

Signature


Chris

"Government ... does not exist of necessity, but rather by virtue of a tragic, almost comical combination of klutzy, opportunistic terrorism against sitting ducks whom it pretends to shelter, plus our childish phobia of responsibility, praying to be exempted from the hard reality of life on life's terms." Wolf DeVoon

"...Make America Great Again. I'm interested in making American FREE again. Then the greatness will come automatically."Ron Paul

Statistics


Total Posts
Total Posts
8,520
Posts Per Day
1.40
Visitor Messages
Total Messages
19
Most Recent Message
10-21-2017 02:49 PM
General Information
Last Activity
Yesterday 08:59 PM
Join Date
10-20-2007
Referrals
1

38 Friends

  1. A Son of Liberty A Son of Liberty is offline

    Member

    A Son of Liberty
  2. acptulsa acptulsa is offline

    Member

    acptulsa
  3. Anti Federalist Anti Federalist is online now

    Member

    Anti Federalist
  4. Austrian Econ Disciple
  5. axiomata axiomata is offline

    Member

    axiomata
  6. Brassmouth Brassmouth is offline

    Member

    Brassmouth
  7. BuddyRey BuddyRey is offline

    Member

    BuddyRey
  8. Cabal Cabal is offline

    Member

    Cabal
  9. Cap Cap is offline

    Member

    Cap
  10. CaptUSA CaptUSA is offline

    Member

    CaptUSA
Showing Friends 1 to 10 of 38
Page 1 of 4 123 ... LastLast
Page 1 of 4 123 ... LastLast

05-07-2024


05-02-2024


04-19-2024


04-16-2024


04-13-2024


02-24-2024


02-04-2024


01-19-2024


08-28-2023


03-02-2023


01-13-2023


11-10-2022


10-13-2022


10-12-2022


09-30-2022


09-20-2022


08-20-2022



Page 1 of 4 123 ... LastLast
No results to display...
Page 1 of 151 1231151101 ... LastLast

06-14-2024


06-13-2024


06-11-2024


06-10-2024


06-07-2024


06-06-2024


06-05-2024


06-02-2024


05-31-2024


05-30-2024



Page 1 of 151 1231151101 ... LastLast