Matt4Liberty
Member

I know it was tongue and cheek, but the point stands. I love how people on the Internet except you to do the searching for them. It was published during the last election cycle and that's when I read it. I don't work for you and certainly don't have time to do it right now. If you are curious enough to read it yourself you can do the work to find it yourself, or you don't have to. Why I would do it is beyond absurd.

Personally, for being a lifelong parasite I hope this is his hell and he's getting what's supposed to be coming to him.

I suggest you find the dissertation she wrote to get that doctorate. It was so poorly written at an elementary level. If I would have turned that in in 4th grade I would have failed, and that's not hyperbole. Biden got the university more federal money and that's the only reason she passed and has the doctor title. Honestly pedo Joe even in his senility is probably more well spoken than "Dr" Jill.

Yes, the leftists are pragmatic when it comes to getting their agenda through. Small steps and before you know it, they completed a cultural revolution without going through it Mao's way. You on the other hand just expect to wait and not give them "implied consent" like that's something they worry about.

That's always such a foolish argument. When whatever agency that's going to become the modern day equivalent of the KGB, ŠtB, STASI, etc... kicks your door in at 2AM, you will not be able to tell them you didn't provide "implied consent". In post war Czechoslovakia, Edvard Beneš was a terrible president. That doesn't change the fact that if more people stood behind him, Klement Gottwald wouldn't have been able to complete his communist coup. Whoever they have chosen probably couldn't survive the primary campaign enough to win the general. Without the scrutiny of the primary, that individual will have an easier go, especially with only a few months left before the election.