golibertygirl
New Member

If you are just dead set on a governor then at least go with one that isn't so dead set against the first amendment. Hard no on Desantis. I'd take Kristi Noem with her puppy killing self first. At least she's decent to look at.

I keep wondering that over and over.

Hmmm....interesting. From the story there are several laws the protestors could be prosecuted under without having a specific flag burning law: Protesters took down an American flag and replaced it with a Palestinian flag and at one point burned the U.S. flag before someone ran into the crowd and snatched it away. Theft of federal property, disorderly conduct, and violation of the federal riot statute. And that would be true if these were right wing protests who stole a Palestinian flag and set it on fire in the middle of the street. But if somone buys a flag with his own money and sets it on fire on his own property, as long as he isn't violating and burning ordinance, that should be legal.

I 100% agree with you about the video! And I like what they were doing with the website. Fauci absolutely needs to be prosecuted. The most damning evidence against Fauci is that in 2012 he said that if a pandemic resulted from GOF research it was still "worth it." That quote alone plus the fact that he funded GOF should be enough for a crimes against humanity conviction. Watch this to understand Dr. Fauci.

Part of the Constitution includes freedom of speech last time I checked. But hey, if you want to support Desantis in 2028 go for it.

This wasn't a cut. It was a tear. I've never had a chunk of skin removed from my body and it didn't start bleeding immediately. And if it's this tiny "paper cut" like injury, why the big ass bandage?

DeSantis is a moron. Anybody who thinks children shouldn't learn about Ruby Bridges is not fit to be president. And while he didn't personally ban the film, he pushed for laws which opened the door for it and then when that became and issue he didn't stand up and say "That's obviously not what the law is for." But someone could say "DeSantis has found his place as governor of Florida so let him stay there."

Why are you surprised? Trump's weakness is his ego. Bibi Netanyahu played to Trump's ego.

:rollleyes: dannno This is what SS said. You can judge for yourself. The SS doctrine is a president can only be impeached for crimes someone claims he committed that were not official acts

Very interesting. But unfortunately the website referenced www.prosecutenow.io is not up. You can find it at the web archive: https://web.archive.org/web/20230324115831/https://prosecutenow.io/ It seems the last time it was live was January 6, 2024.

Yeah...it jams sometimes and other times people go through a 30 round mag dump without a malfunction. Both happened when Colin Noir tested it. Here are my thoughts on the Glock switch. It proves Whoopi Goldberg to be an even greater idiot for arguing with Rand Paul that she was against "fully automatic" assault rifles but that her "Glock" should be legal when the Glock and the AR are both semiautomatic guns that with the right parts can be made fully auto.

And if the psychic friends hotline could just give me the winning lottery numbers I would be a millionaire.

Right. I know that. You know that. Even he knows that. But his argument is, that anything (kinda sorta not really) that the President does as an "official duty" is by definition not a high crime or misdemeanor. And yes. He's wrong. Multiple people told him that multiple times. But yeah. Impeachment is the way to hold presidents accountable for acts that they do as president that they may be able to claim criminal immunity from. Obama could have been impeached for murdering Anwar Al Awlaki. He can't be criminally tried for that.

He would have been a good RNC speaker. So would Colin Noir.

That the RNC did a piss poor job at black voter outreach. I'm not sure who was impressed by Amber Rose. The highlight of Tim Scott's speech should have been "We would have had police reform in 2020 if the Democrats hadn't blocked me" and instead it was "American is not racist." And to close it off the RNC played a video that, to me anyway, endorses racism. I bet you a dime to a dollar that Tim Scott wasn't happy about the Ole Miss "monkey noises" video being played at the RNC. And yet in the face of actual Marxism at the RNC you initially seemed unfazed until I pointed out the Marxism multiple times but then you accused some woman you don't know for reasons you have YET to articulate of being Marxist. Seriously, what evidence do you have the black being mocked at Ole Miss for supporting the Palestinians is Marxist? Do you even know her name?

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/video/2024/jul/25/fbi-director-questions-bullet-shrapnel-hit-trump-video Okay. I'm not a gun guy. But how could it be anything other than the bullet? Shrapnel? Shrapnel from what? I'm confused.

Well I don't support Larry Elder either. You're not going to win anyone over saying that slave owners were the ones owed reparations. Larry Elder claims to be a Christian right? God had the Hebrews "borrow" from the Egyptians before leaving Egypt knowing that the former slave owners who were then holding the debt would soon be drowned in the Red Sea. (See Exodus 12:36) And I'm not crazy about Clarence Thomas defending his law clerk after it came out that she sent texts saying "I HATE BLACK PEOPLE.". I mean seriously WTF? I do support Tim Scott and openly said if Trump picked him as VP I'd hold my nose and vote for Trump. But funny enough, Tim Scott didn't get much love here at RPF. In fact...I think I'm the only Tim Scott supporter I know. So why should black people in general support someone that Republicans apparently don't support? I and a lot of other black people supported General Colin Powell before Bush ruined his legacy by getting him to push the fake WMD narrative. (I see you didn't have Colin Powell on your list either.) I like J.C. Watts and wish he was running for president instead of Trump (J.C. Watts didn't make your list either). So...you've given me a list of three blacks, two of which are SUS (I mean really? Justice Thomas defending someone who said "I HATE BLACKS"? And I used to defend his ass), and one who apparently nobody likes for reasons I can't fathom. Black Lives Matter hasn't lined up behind her and are calling for a real primary for reasons I can't fathom either. Actually I can. They might actually have some principles. They have gotten some hate on Twitter over this though because their corruption in handling donations was exposed.

LOL. Axios had to fact check itself. https://www.axios.com/2024/07/24/kamala-harris-border-czar-immigratin Harris border confusion haunts her new campaign Stef W. Kight Share on facebook (opens in new window)

Well the RNC "black outreach" consisted of mixed race rapper and OnlyFans model Amber Rose on the positive side and the promotion of the racist "monkey man" Ole Miss student on the negative side. https://thehill.com/homenews/race-politics/4780093-ole-miss-racist-gestures-black-woman-video-republican-national-convention/ There is an old saying. Don't pee on me and tell me it's raining.

And that's the motive for releasing COVID in 2019.

Actually according to the Swordsmyth doctrine, immunity for official duties includes impeachment because immunity means something isn't a crime and if it isn't a crime you can't be impeached unless SS has deemed it "malfeasance" in which case you can impeach but only under very limited circumstances.

I just threw up a little in my mouth. Of course he won't talk about the excess deaths attributable to the vaccines themselves. He won't talk about natural immunity. He won't talk about how promoting things like sunlight, exercise, fresh air and proper diet were scientifically proven to be just as effective, if not more, than vaccines for improving COVID outcomes and yet Fauci did the opposite by demanding beaches, parks and gyms be closed while allowing bars and liquor stores to be open. He won't talk about the fact that NONE of this would have happened in the first place without the gain of function research that his buddy Fauci funded.

Well she sure acted like securing the border was part of her job.

Everyone keeps focusing on the first shot. But why wasn't the 2nd or 3rd shot even close? Trump did not immediately duck. Kennedy was a moving target and the 3rd shot killed him. Trump merely turned his head but was otherwise stationary. It was dumb luck that the first shot was as close as it was.

It actually was a difficult shot using a crappy AR15 without a scope but just a red dot optical and getting distracted by a police officer right before the shot. So....why not give him a scope? I honestly don't know the answer to that. Unless your analysis is that he was supposed to think he was acting on his own. But in all of the MKULTRA deep state mind control planning they couldn't plant the "You're probably not going to hit Trump with that rifle and without a scope unless you get VERY lucky" suggestion? Trump was standing still for a couple of seconds after touching his ear. He didn't duck until follow up shots were fired. That was the perfect time for a qualified shooter with a scope to actually get him.