NorthCarolinaLiberty
Member

Looks like the Puerto Rican roast joke had no negative impact either. So, what the Marxists tried to do is win a national election with three constituencies: black women, AWFULs and queeers.

From the perspective of those who see Trump as a danger to democracy Achieving a political victory by more people voting for your candidate is now a danger to democracy? Do these people even listen to themselves? And if that is not "democracy" then what is it they are talking about? (Yes, I know these are rhetorical questions...)

You never answered my question. "Ok, suppose we've already nationalized the elections like you propose. In the swing states that Trump won the "Biden Election Czar" claims that votes were disenfranchised because of id laws and awards the presidency to Harris. Are you ok with that?" Nationalizing elections seems great when your guy has power but not so great when the opposition has power. Your guy can mandate voter ids but the opposition can mandate no voter ids just as easily. Also since we have the electoral college it doesn't really matter that much if a state is committing fraud because most of the time a blue state is going to go blue whether they cheat or not. If Oregon was a red state they're most likely to result in a red outcome whether they cheat or not. Here's another question for you. Do you think the federal government should also determine how a state should hold an election to secede?

Hmmm....

I don't see this guy as a hero. He's more of an exterminator or a dirty job guy who really enjoys his work. However, society is not improved with his conviction. He needs to be acquitted. The inquisition process is punishment enough.

Ok, suppose we've already nationalized the elections like you propose. In the swing states that Trump won the "Biden Election Czar" claims that votes were disenfranchised because of id laws and awards the presidency to Harris. Are you ok with that?

https://x.com/i/status/1854562507974725791 1854562507974725791

https://x.com/Will_Tanner_1/status/1854687094960275580 1854687094960275580

I think it's going to be Tulsi.

Trump...legally beat two women.

Hell yeah.

https://x.com/michaelmalice/status/1614671398290481158 1614671398290481158 https://x.com/libsoftiktok/status/1854625773807694112 1854625773807694112

Yeah, no great shakes there.

Of course not comrade. These are acceptable "Two Minutes Hate" messages.

https://x.com/libsoftiktok/status/1854640886698942839 1854640886698942839

https://x.com/AntiFeder1776/status/1854726139538747545 1854726139538747545

Hopefully not related to THE Sam Harris.

I expect to that on the front page of the NYT tomorrow.

Is this from the same people who said Rubio was going to be picked as VP?

What will Marxists use next? Simple... https://x.com/AntiFeder1776/status/1854720253961327102 1854720253961327102

Barf Might as well have Pompeo.

Meh. I spoke my mind. You spoke yours and even if you say anything else, I'm still not going to believe you. So if you wanna talk, talk. I don't care. In the meantime, I'm signing off to read a book on HAM radios and I also don't care if you are into HAMs, but you can talk about that too. lol

NH just did ten times more to advance the cause of liberty than Oliver could ever hope to accomplish.

LOL. You posted it to back up your position. Lol. You just forgot what account you were posting under. It happens to the best of 'em. Lol

Well, PAF how about that? Hasn't even taken office yet and what you said was the solution is already starting to happen. There is no need to spend billions of dollars to deport or erect a police state. Just like you said, cut off the gibs. Millions will self deport within a year.

As I said, I am not playing your game.

https://x.com/___eb__/status/1854616550306701470 1854616550306701470