Schifference
Banned

Mises Wire Wanjiru Njoya 04/27/2024 The classical liberal defense of contractual freedom is derived from the principle of individual autonomy. Freedom of contract entails the right to enter into or exit from contracts at will. As Richard Epstein argues in his defense of the contract at will: "The first way to argue for the contract at will is to insist upon the importance of freedom of contract as an end in itself. Freedom of contract is an aspect of individual liberty, every bit as much as freedom of speech, or freedom in the selection of marriage partners or in the adoption of religious beliefs or affiliations" (p. 953). Utilitarian classical liberals, like Epstein himself, who agree with him on the value of individual liberty therefore defend the widest possible scope for contractual freedom. They would only accept limits on that freedom in exceptional cases which Epstein defines as “the infrequent cases in which discharge of the contract at will is inconsistent with the performance of some public duty or with the protection of some public right.”

By David Stockman April 27, 2024 This is an excerpt from David Stockmans book: Trump’s War on Capitalism. As it happened, the US Congress acted like greased lightning, enacting the $2.2 trillion CARES act virtually sight unseen just eleven days after The Donald’s March 16 press conference initiated the Covid lockdowns. The bill was over eight hundred pages long and included a more ostentatious cornucopia of spend- ing authorities and free stuff than had ever before been imagined in even the most profligate quarters of Capitol Hill. This tsunami of money amounted to roughly $6,000 for every man, woman, and child in America, or 45 percent of all federal government expen- ditures in 2019. The money was literally shoveled into the US economy in mas- sive dollops with virtually no eligibility standards, qualification pro- cesses, and enforcement/accountability procedures. This included:

Debbie Lerman Jan 15, 2024 In part one of this article, I reviewed the contractual and regulatory framework applied by the US government to the initial development, manufacture, and acquisition of the Covid mRNA shots, using the BioNTech/Pfizer agreements to illustrate the process. I showed that Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) was granted to these products based on clinical trials and manufacturing processes conducted with * no binding legal standards,

Apr 17, 2024 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=idxB2vtBHpU

https://www.brighteon.com/cc6fcf48-eb0a-4207-a372-76caf459a468 Just watch the video, give it 30 seconds or so and watch and listen to the woman... SHE IS A DEEP FAKE. Think they wont use this technology to put words into Trumps mouth? Trump is the canary in the coalmine. If they do it to Trump, if they do it to Alex Jones, rest assured the WILL DO THIS TO YOU. We have VIDEO PROOF OF YOU MURDERING <insert probably a DEEP FAKE victim> then sentence you to LIFE IN PRISON. Why? Because they can, and your love of liberty, freedom, and life stands as a THREAT to their power. Remember how they keep saying how everything and everyone is a "THREAT TO DEMOCRACY"?

Ron Paul Institute by John W. And Nisha Whitehead Apr 24, 2024 “Nothing is real”, observed John Lennon, and that’s especially true of politics. Much like the fabricated universe in Peter Weir’s 1998 film The Truman Show, in which a man’s life is the basis for an elaborately staged television show aimed at selling products and procuring ratings, the political scene in the United States has devolved over the years into a carefully calibrated exercise in how to manipulate, polarize, propagandize and control a population. Take the media circus that is the Donald Trump hush money trial, which panders to the public’s voracious appetite for titillating, soap opera drama, keeping the citizenry distracted, diverted and divided.

By Cassie B. Natural News April 25, 2024 A Court of Appeals in North Carolina has set a precedent for the forced vaccination of all children with a controversial ruling involving a 14-year-old boy who was given a COVID-19 vaccine without his consent or that of his parents. The court ruled unanimously that the Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness Act (PREP Act) preempted a state law that could have protected the minor, Tanner Smith. The problem began when Smith, who is a student at Western Guilford High School in Greensboro, was informed that he had been exposed to COVID-19 at school. In a letter to his parents, the school district said that he could not return to football practice until he had been given clearance by a public health professional unless he got tested for the virus. The letter added that a local school would be holding a free clinic offering COVID-19 tests and that consent for the tests would be required.