Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: 2021: Welcome to Post-persuasion America

  1. #1

    2021: Welcome to Post-persuasion America

    Welcome to 2021 in post-persuasion America!

    I first heard this term used by Steve Bannon, architect of the surprising 2016 Trump campaign, in a PBS Frontline documentary titled America's Great Divide. Speaking way back in the precovid days of early 2020, Bannon asserted the information age makes us less curious and willing to consider worldviews unlike our own. We have access to virtually all of humanity's accumulated knowledge and history on devices in our pockets, but the sheer information overload causes us to dig in rather than open up. Anyone who wants to change their mind can find a whole universe of alternative viewpoints online, but very few people do (especially beyond a certain age). For Bannon this meant the Trump campaign, and politics generally, was about mobilization rather than persuasion.

    Because we can always find media sources which confirm our perspective and biases—and dismiss those which don't—the notion of politics by argument or consensus is almost entirely lost. And no matter what our political or cultural perspective, there is someone creating content tailored to suit us as stratified consumers. Thus liberals, conservatives, and people of every other ideological stripe live in vastly different digital media worlds, even when they live in close physical proximity.

    This overwhelming amount of curated and segregated white noise comes at us every day, from 24-hour news to Facebook, Twitter, and YouTube. Idiotic platforms like TikTok and Discord vie with video games for the attention of our children. All of it leaves us numb and exhausted. Our attention spans suffer. We slowly lose our aptitude for deep thinking and serious reading. We attempt to replace wisdom and understanding with data and facts.

    But because information is so abundant and readily available, it becomes worth less and less. Information is cheap, literally.

    For our grandparents, knowledge was analog and came with a price. Gatekeepers, in the form of media, universities, libraries, and bookstores, acted as editors and filters. Walter Cronkite, the most trusted propagandist in America, delivered one version of the news every night. The local newspaper did the same every morning. Even just thirty years ago it was often no easy task, and there was no small cost, to obtain books and literature not easily found in local or university libraries.

    If someone today wants to read Austrian economics, for example (a particular boogeyman of Bannon's), they can do so at virtually no cost other than time. They don't even need to leave home. The smartphone in their palm holds a lifetime of reading and learning in just this one discipline. No physical books, no college, no tuition, and no librarian required.

    So why don't more people do so? The short answer is: most people are beyond persuasion.

    This does not mean we should surrender to the forces of economic illiteracy, or give up trying to win hearts and minds for political liberty. On the contrary, we should redouble our efforts to cultivate anyone interested in civil society, real economics, markets, property, and peace—especially those under thirty. But this is not a numbers game. We should focus on those who can be reached, not some mythical majority. Our task is to reach some people narrowly and deeply, not a majority of people superficially. We stand in contrast to the white noise, and opposed to the superficiality and anti-intellectualism of our age. Mobilizing the few is far more important and far more effective than foolishly trying to persuade the many.

    H.L. Mencken was right about believing in liberty but not believing in it enough to force it upon anyone. Just as we oppose foreign interventionism, we should stop trying to remake those US cities and states which are beyond help. We need to recognize that tens of millions of Americans are likely beyond persuasion in the direction of sensible political or economic views. Millions more are committed socialists who would readily agree to nationalize whole industries and radically redistribute property. By definition these are unreasonable views, so how does one use persuasion where reason is lacking?

    Post-persuasion America requires us to think about how to separate and unyoke ourselves politically from DC. Our immediate future lies in hard federalism, which dovetails with the soft secession which is happening already as millions of Americans vote with their feet. Mobilization and separation, not persuasion, is the way forward.
    "People constantly speak of 'the government'
    doing this or that, as they might speak of God doing it.
    But the government is really nothing but a group of men,
    and usually they are very inferior men."
    -- H. L. Mencken

    “Discipline must come through liberty... We do not consider an individual disciplined when he has been rendered as artificially silent as a mute and as immovable as a paralytic. He is an individual annihilated, not disciplined.” -- Maria Montessori

  2. Remove this section of ads by registering.
  3. #2
    Good read. Humans are not capable of evolving. Probably why tptb want to reduce the population and implement AI - to service the few Mensas of the world.
    “The right to life is the source of all rights—and the right to property is their only implementation. Without property rights, no other rights are possible. Since man has to sustain his life by his own effort, the man who has no right to the product of his effort has no means to sustain his life. The man who produces while others dispose of his product, is a slave.”

    An Agorist Primer

  4. #3
    Read this earlier today & it's pretty much ON.THE.NOSE.
    There is no spoon.

  5. #4

  6. #5
    To prove the article's point, I agree with its author wholeheartedly. I'm not all that frustrated with the dull masses who perceive socialism as some Christ-like savior ideology; getting duped is their lot. But I see red when I think about how the people actually pushing socialism know exactly what it inevitably leads to, and want precisely that for us.

  7. #6
    Quote Originally Posted by ammodotcom View Post
    To prove the article's point, I agree with its author wholeheartedly. I'm not all that frustrated with the dull masses who perceive socialism as some Christ-like savior ideology; getting duped is their lot. But I see red when I think about how the people actually pushing socialism know exactly what it inevitably leads to, and want precisely that for us.
    I don't think you realize that the end isn't in the mind of those who are who pushing the ideas. It's about setting up ingsoc. You think Trotsky would have mobilized all the Bolsheviks if he knew he was just going to be expelled from his own country and then assassinated? These people only care about getting power for themselves

Similar Threads

  1. What political persuasion are you?
    By LastoftheMohicans in forum Grassroots Central
    Replies: 66
    Last Post: 01-09-2019, 12:25 PM
  2. Debate and Persuasion
    By CCTelander in forum Grassroots Central
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 07-30-2018, 02:24 PM
  3. The Art of Persuasion
    By Return2Sanity in forum Marketing Strategy, Influence & Persuasion
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 12-31-2011, 01:11 PM
  4. Thanksgiving Persuasion - what to say to whom and when and how
    By aknappjr in forum Grassroots Central
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 11-26-2009, 06:41 PM
  5. Thanksgiving Persuasion
    By aknappjr in forum Success Strategies
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 11-14-2007, 10:11 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts