Tab Content
  • Theocrat's Avatar
    Today, 05:15 PM
    Go and watch Ben-Hur (1959): Your mind will be changed.
    34 replies | 554 view(s)
  • Dr.3D's Avatar
    Today, 02:37 PM
    Demonstrated? Seems they were demonstrating their stupidity by protesting in the street.
    22 replies | 186 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Today, 01:38 PM
    She didn't use a gun. And even though they want to ban SUVs, they want people to stay under the impression that only guns can be used to cause mayhem. Of course when that antifa lady was run over at the Charlottesville protest that was covered non-stop so....I dunno. Edit: NVM. I see this in your article. The man’s motive was not immediately known. According to investigators, preliminary information suggests that drugs and alcohol could have played a role. He was just drunk and high? No racism as a motive? Yeah....M.A.D.D. was so 1990s.
    22 replies | 186 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Today, 01:35 PM
    Is it just me, or is Newsweek less biased that a lot of the MSM? They also published the gain of function story back in 2020. Note this story also cites a study on the effectiveness of hydroxycholoroquine. https://www.newsweek.com/how-americans-opinion-dr-anthony-fauci-has-changed-over-past-year-1596690 Don't listen to those maniacs. Everybody loves you," Jimmy Kimmel told Dr. Anthony Fauci on his ABC show May 5, shortly after mocking the Fox News Channel's Tucker Carlson for criticizing colleges that mandate students get a coronavirus vaccine. Last week, singer Trisha Yearwood was so giddy over meeting Fauci she said she was tempted to have him autograph her vaccine card. Last year, actress Julia Roberts called Fauci her "personal hero." There's also a children's book set for release June 28 called Dr. Fauci: How a Boy From Brooklyn Became America's Doctor, and Disney's National Geographic is working on a presumably laudatory documentary about Fauci. More than a year into the pandemic, the list of trendsetters who have fawned over the chief medical adviser to the president goes on and on. But while Americans had mostly been on board with the praise, new polling data suggests their patience for lockdowns, social distancing and mask-wearing has worn thin, as has their confidence in Fauci, with 60 percent of Republicans, 41 percent of independents and 20 percent of Democrats saying their trust in him has decreased in the past year.
    1 replies | 53 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Today, 01:27 PM
    That's your dishonest definition. You are forcing the word "state" on something that doesn't require a state to exist. The Diggers of England are considered early precursors of anarco communists. No state required. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diggers https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anarcho-communism#Early_precursors
    35 replies | 1370 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Today, 01:25 PM
    I'm quite familiar with the fact that the gospel reached Africa and the oldest Christian church in the world is in Ethiopia. And I don't know many Christians who aren't familiar with the story of the Ethiopian eunuch. That said "capitalism" as we now know it didn't exist on a large scale until the 16th century. You can't have anti-capitalism without capitalism. A) That's a straw man argument. I never said there was anything anti-capitalist in Scripture. But the early Christian church was not capitalist. B) It's false to say "the organization of the church and the organization of the economy are two separate things." Going all the way back to Moses there were religious laws about economics, such as the fact that Jews could not charge Jews interest. By the way, modern capitalism cannot exist without interest. That's the point. Letting money work for you. Capitalism is more than just using money as a means of exchange or having a market. While you can't have capitalism without market forces, you can have market forces without capitalism. Feudalism predated capitalism in Europe but there were markets. LOL. Jesus kicked the money changers out of the temple so clearly ^that is not true. But more importantly, the same laws of Moses that you referenced at the beginning of your post laid out how the Lord wanted commerce to be done. So from the beginning of the Old Testament church, which predated Jesus by thousands of years, the church was about the organization of the economy.
    35 replies | 1370 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Today, 12:58 PM
    1) Glad to see Fauci's book got pulled even if it's just temporary. 2) The Pentagon funded this research more than the NIH. And what does the Pentagon want to obtain? Why weapons of course.
    1 replies | 147 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Today, 12:43 PM
    You must spread some Reputation around before giving it to CaptUSA again.
    6 replies | 93 view(s)
  • CaptUSA's Avatar
    Today, 12:30 PM
    People who have had Covid and got over it are going to be this country's saving grace. It's because of them that we can stop mandatory vaccinations. It should be just because of liberty n stuff, but it'll be because about a 1/3 of the country will get no benefit from a vaccination. There is simply no scientific way of making a case to jab those folks.
    6 replies | 93 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Today, 11:50 AM
    That's nice. What would you call the early Christian church? It most certainly was not capitalistic by any stretch of the imagination. Acts 4:32-35. 32 All the believers were one in heart and mind. No one claimed that any of their possessions was their own, but they shared everything they had. 33 With great power the apostles continued to testify to the resurrection of the Lord Jesus. And God’s grace was so powerfully at work in them all 34 that there were no needy persons among them. For from time to time those who owned land or houses sold them, brought the money from the sales 35 and put it at the apostles’ feet, and it was distributed to anyone who had need. You certainly cannot call ^that capitalism by any stretch of the imagination. If this was a state requiring people to sell all of their possessions and keep them in common it would be classic statist communism. Instead, this was done voluntarily. No, the people weren't forced to sell their possessions and let the church distribute to who had need. They chose to do it. When Ananias and Sapphira lied to Peter and claimed they had donated all when they had only donated a portion, this is what Peter told them: Acts 5:3-5 5 Now a man named Ananias, together with his wife Sapphira, also sold a piece of property. 2 With his wife’s full knowledge he kept back part of the money for himself, but brought the rest and put it at the apostles’ feet.
    35 replies | 1370 view(s)
  • cjm's Avatar
    Today, 11:44 AM
    Outside of my household, I know of only two holdouts. There are others that I think are holdouts because they shut up like me when everyone else is bragging about their jabs, but can't say for sure. I suspect the two holdouts I know will cave eventually. Not sure about the wife and kids. Hope not, I'd like to see grandchildren. As for me, I'm not getting it. Ever.
    12 replies | 352 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Today, 11:37 AM
    No. You are arguing through projection. You are doing exactly what you are falsely accusing me of doing. Someone can believe in communal living without wanting to force communal living on others. Or someone can with to do communal living through government force. Your "wall of text" doesn't change your dishonesty in this regard.
    35 replies | 1370 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Today, 07:09 AM
    True. But the ocean is big. I just need a good solar powered yacht.
    19 replies | 541 view(s)
  • bv3's Avatar
    06-12-2021, 11:44 PM
    Did blackrock just receive a boatload of monetized debt courtesy of the fed, and use at least some of that debt to buy people's homes for 20-50% above market value (and before inflation registers entirely, so that 20-50% above will turn out to be even or less in a few years) as well as buying up other, less tangible, assets? Black uptown neighborhood in Kenosha was destroyed during the "protests." That very area is slated for a 2.1 million dollar "infrastructure" investment. Its amazing how by changing the method, these fuckers still get away with it.
    74 replies | 2773 view(s)
  • bv3's Avatar
    06-12-2021, 11:34 PM
    16:37 So, they can hijack ribsomes to synthesize this protein w/in the cytoplasm but they cant fuckin just synthesize the protein? Don't bullshit me. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Synthetic_ribosome
    1 replies | 90 view(s)
  • Dr.3D's Avatar
    06-12-2021, 07:20 PM
    Thank you, I've fixed it.
    32 replies | 707 view(s)
  • Dr.3D's Avatar
    06-12-2021, 06:11 PM
    You guys can drink all the pine needle tea you want, but you are not going to get any Suramin from it. https://joybileefarm.com/pine-needle-tea/ Dr. Judy Mikovits did not say that Suramin can be found in Pine Needles. She was misquoted. Suramin is a 100 year old World Health Organization chemical drug. Suramin is not found in Pine Needles. You can hear Dr. Judy Mikovits testimony here (@ the 13:40 minute mark). https://odysee.com/@PROJECTCAMELOT:d/DR.MIKOVITSANDDR.YOUNG-RE-VAX_FINAL:8
    32 replies | 707 view(s)
  • Dr.3D's Avatar
    06-12-2021, 03:00 PM
    Do they have money in the budget for such things?
    19 replies | 541 view(s)
  • cjm's Avatar
    06-12-2021, 12:22 PM
    So much for "returning to normal."
    3 replies | 174 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    06-12-2021, 12:08 PM
    And steam. Don't forget steam. But yeah, that's the way it was designed.
    22 replies | 432 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    06-12-2021, 12:07 PM
    Maybe that was after centuries of mixing with the other Japanese ethnic groups?
    31 replies | 1303 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    06-12-2021, 11:08 AM
    LOL. At least he didn't put the human in a whale zoo.
    7 replies | 183 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    06-12-2021, 11:06 AM
    Ya know, if we would just spend less money blowing up roads and bridges in other countries they wouldn't be so eager for China to come in and build roads and bridges.
    19 replies | 541 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    06-12-2021, 11:03 AM
    I went to an almost all white elementary school. I remember when a kid from India joined our first grade class. He was darker skinned then me, and I'm not light skinned, but with straight hair. That totally blew my 6 y/o mind. The truth is that India isn't homogenous the way Japan kind of is. But then there are the Ainu, the dark skinned wolly haired indigineous Japanese. So in reality a lot of countries have people of different ethnic groups that we just lump into one for convenience.
    31 replies | 1303 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    06-12-2021, 08:41 AM
    As distrubing as this is, I would consider this an example of what 69360 was saying with regards to scientists doing things for no other reason than to see if they can. Or I would even go a step further and say there was a potential benefit to the research. Staph is already a pathogen that kills people. Doing experiements on humanized mice with aborted fetal tissue grafted onto them to better understand how staph, an already existing pathogen, affects humans could lead to better ways to prevent and treat staph, again an already existing pathogen. Also from your link it sounds like human organs were being grown on the mice. There is a severe shortage of transplant organs. So there's another potential benefit. In fact, the more I think of it, this is the opposite of 69360's point in that it's not "doing things for no other reason except that they can" but rather "doing something unethical for a potential benefit to mankind." Dr. Mengela's research on hypothermia, where he put Jewish prisoners in freezing water bringing them to near death to see if he could revive them, is credited for saving many lives in the decades since it happened. Same thing. Unethical research done for a potential benefit.
    22 replies | 432 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    06-12-2021, 08:31 AM
    Yeah...but 69360 would say that was "Just because they can." However the CIA has long looked at how to weaponize psychodelic drugs. So it wasn't a "just because they can" experiment.
    22 replies | 432 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    06-12-2021, 08:28 AM
    Yeah.....but this is different. They were getting government grant money and sending that grant money to government researchers in other countries. To get that money you have to justify it. This isn't creating a mouse with an ear on its back (although that's actually useful). We did bioweapons research until that was banned. Since then we've continued to do bioweapons research, only we call it "defensive" bioweapons research. That kind of makes sense if you know the enemy has anthrax to make anthrax yourself to know how to defeat it. But it this case money was sent to our arch "enemy" to help the create a more deadly virus. No, the "scientists just being scientists" explanation makes no sense either. Also I see you ignored my pint about tear gas.
    22 replies | 432 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    06-12-2021, 06:41 AM
    Why is that unlikely? U.S. government researches infected Guatamalen prisoners and military with siphylus. And you're making the mistake of conflating rogue elements in the government with the entire government. See: It is extremely unlikely that there was a secret joint session of congress where the president signed a secret bill and the SCOTUS secretly approved the action to develop a COVID virus as a bioweapon, but it's not extremely unlikely that government beuracrats did this to create a bioweapon. Again I'll ask you the question I have asked the "trust the science" crowd (not saying you're in that crowd), since I first learned of gain of function research last year. What possible motive could there be for doing gain of function research on a deadly virus other than to create a bioweapon? If you do research on how to increase the yield of a nuclear bomb, everyone understands that to be weapons research. Why is this any different?
    22 replies | 432 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    06-12-2021, 06:19 AM
    Do you consider tear gas a chemical weapon? It's not supposed to be deadly at all. It has the exact effect that it's meant to have. If you have the goal of killing off all of humanity then no it's not a good bioweapon. If your goal is to be just deadly enough to scare the entire world into submission...then damn it's an awesome bioweapon! And what exaclty is the point of "gain of function" of a virus that can kill people except to be used as a weapon? I do not at all buy the "We need to create a more deadly virus so we can know how to fight it" argument. That makes no logical sense.
    22 replies | 432 view(s)
More Activity

49 Visitor Messages

  1. View Conversation
    Please stop trying to "out" Erowe1. Let it go.
  2. I know. Like I said I was going to yank your chain but realized that in the current circumstances it would be bad taste even for me.
  3. View Conversation
    At least until every county or so willingly decided to submit to Christ, which I think will happen eventually because I'm a postmillennialist.
  4. View Conversation
    I wish things were a lot more local too. I'm really not looking for a country of 300 million at all. I think that's too big. Those who didn't want to live by Christian law could live somewhere else and choose God's judgment over his blessings.
  5. View Conversation
    And while I do believe the BIble requires civil authorities to punish homosexuality, and with death as the maximum penalty, I don't think it would be legitimate even for the government to just round up people in a gay bar.

    My reasons on the bearing arms bit are much closer to yours (resistance against tyranny.)
  6. View Conversation
    To be perfectly clear, I absolutely oppose vigilantism. I know you were joking around but I just want you to be clear on where I stand.
  7. View Conversation
    Will you kindly give a tongue lashing to the racist of the board, AmericanSpartan? Thank you. I'd like to see it.
  8. Sorry, but you have failed. That verse does not contain the words "Grace is irresistible." You can interpret it that way, but that's not what the verse says. You had to admit there was "relational language" in the Bible. Yet you have stuck to your guns that there isn't a verse that says "Have a relationship with Jesus." Likewise there is no verse that says "Grace is irresistible." If you were honest you would simply admit that. But you aren't honest.
  9. View Conversation
    Acts 13:48
    And when the Gentiles heard this, they began rejoicing and glorifying the word of the Lord, and as many as were appointed to eternal life believed.
Showing Visitor Messages 1 to 10 of 49
Page 1 of 5 123 ... LastLast
Page 1 of 5 123 ... LastLast
About jmdrake

Basic Information

Profile Sidebar Configuration

Profile Sidebar Configuration

Activist Reputation (Self-Rated):
1
Select if you "Stand with Rand":
I Stand with Rand (This will add a "Stand with Rand" badge by your name badge by yourr name in all posts.)
Select if you do not support Trump or Hillary.:
No Trump. No Hillary. (This will add a "None of the Above" badge by your name in all posts.)

Signature


9/11 Thermate experiments

Winston Churchhill on why the U.S. should have stayed OUT of World War I

"I am so %^&*^ sick of this cult of Ron Paul. The Paulites. What is with these %^&*^ people? Why are there so many of them?" YouTube rant by "TheAmazingAtheist"

"We as a country have lost faith and confidence in freedom." -- Ron Paul

"It can be a challenge to follow the pronouncements of President Trump, as he often seems to change his position on any number of items from week to week, or from day to day, or even from minute to minute." -- Ron Paul
Quote Originally Posted by Brian4Liberty View Post
The road to hell is paved with good intentions. No need to make it a superhighway.
Quote Originally Posted by osan View Post
The only way I see Trump as likely to affect any real change would be through martial law, and that has zero chances of success without strong buy-in by the JCS at the very minimum.

Statistics


Total Posts
Total Posts
45,548
Posts Per Day
8.89
Visitor Messages
Total Messages
49
Most Recent Message
11-05-2016 03:40 PM
General Information
Last Activity
Today 05:56 PM
Join Date
06-06-2007
Referrals
5

39 Friends

  1. affa affa is offline

    Member

    affa
  2. bobbyw24 bobbyw24 is offline

    Banned

    bobbyw24
  3. bv3 bv3 is offline

    Member

    bv3
  4. Cap Cap is offline

    Member

    Cap
  5. Captain Shays Captain Shays is offline

    Member

    Captain Shays
  6. CaptUSA CaptUSA is offline

    Member

    CaptUSA
  7. Christian Liberty
  8. cjm cjm is online now

    Member

    cjm
  9. Crowish Crowish is offline

    Member

    Crowish
  10. DGambler DGambler is offline

    Member

    DGambler
Showing Friends 1 to 10 of 39
Page 1 of 4 123 ... LastLast
View jmdrake's Blog

Recent Entries

How Ron Paul could smack down Iran critics

by jmdrake on 05-15-2013 at 08:34 AM
Quote Originally Posted by jmdrake View Post
Ron needs to quit playing defense and go on offense. It's not enough to say "the Soviet Union was worse than Iran." If he could point out the following documented facts it would shut the naysayer up for good or at least make them back-peddle.

1) In 2003 Iran was the only Muslim country to help us fight and remove the Taliban from power.

See: Jane's Defense Weekly India joins anti-Taliban coalition. "India is believed to have joined Russia, the USA

Read More

Categories
Uncategorized

The new bill of rights.

by jmdrake on 05-15-2013 at 08:33 AM
Quote Originally Posted by jmdrake View Post
This parody is an attempt to "rewrite" the bill of rights in keeping with the current application by our criminal government. Original text will be in italics followed by a list of possible options.


Amendment I

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government

Read More

Categories
Uncategorized

Federal Reserve advised gold standard for Russia

by jmdrake on 05-15-2013 at 08:32 AM
Quote Originally Posted by jmdrake View Post
I ran across this information by accident (providence?) while looking for something else. The first link is an essay from Jude Wanniski who went with fed governor Wayne Angell to Moscow right after the collapse of the soviet union. Note that Angell advocated the new Russia to go to a gold backed currency! The second link is an online Google book from the Mises institute that talks about the same essay. I've excerpted the essay bellow. (It's too long to post directly). It's interesting to note

Read More

Categories
Uncategorized

Washington Post 2002 : The U.S. pushed jihad on Afghan schoolchildren.

by jmdrake on 09-13-2011 at 01:15 PM
Quote Originally Posted by dannno View Post
From U.S., the ABC's of Jihad
Violent Soviet-Era Textbooks Complicate Afghan Education Efforts


By Joe Stephens and David B. Ottaway
Washington Post Staff Writers
Saturday, March 23, 2002; Page A01

In the twilight of the Cold War, the United States spent millions of dollars to supply Afghan schoolchildren with textbooks filled with violent images and militant Islamic teachings, part of covert attempts to spur resistance to the Soviet occupation.

Read More

Categories
Uncategorized
Page 1 of 4 123 ... LastLast

06-11-2021


06-08-2021


06-04-2021


05-05-2021


04-18-2021


04-17-2021


04-12-2021


03-16-2021


03-11-2021


02-26-2021


02-25-2021


02-17-2021

  • 02:31 AM - Hidden

02-13-2021


02-09-2021


02-04-2021


01-31-2021


01-21-2021


12-09-2020


12-07-2020


12-06-2020



Page 1 of 4 123 ... LastLast

11-17-2017


Page 1 of 312 1231151101 ... LastLast

06-14-2021


06-12-2021


06-11-2021



Page 1 of 312 1231151101 ... LastLast