Tab Content
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Today, 03:12 AM
    You know they've already been talking about how this might require "booster" vaccination right? Actually it's the vaccine makers pushing this. Real scientist question the need. But guess which "scientists" will be deemed the "real scientists" and which will be deemed quacks?
    7 replies | 175 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Yesterday, 06:34 PM
    A friend of my reacted to this new this way "This is terrible. She has a right to speak her mind." And I was like "Of course she does. And her fellow republicans had a right not to vote for her." Seriously...much ado about nada.
    87 replies | 1708 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Yesterday, 06:22 PM
    LOL. So even after Dr. Fauci (the weasel), Joe Biden (the senile) and the CDC (another untrustworthy alphabet agency) all said you had to vaccine or wear a mask, the fascists in New York say you have to vaccine and wear a mask.
    7 replies | 175 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Yesterday, 06:21 PM
    You must spread some Reputation around before giving it to Brian4Liberty again.
    7 replies | 175 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Yesterday, 06:18 PM
    The irony is angelatc got temp banned here. So each of you got banned on a different platform. Ban banning.
    520 replies | 27323 view(s)
  • CaptUSA's Avatar
    Yesterday, 12:25 PM
    Which is why when you try to remove the nuance, you end up flat. I'm actually glad to see Ron's position on this mirrors my own as I laid out earlier. There is no reason why a private company would do this without government coercion. So if this ever became an issue - which it won't - then you'd have to address the underlying problems. Obviously, some politicians are taking a proactive step to tell businesses to not slice their own throats. Ok - not really necessary, but also not really harmful compared to everything else they do. It's just a political show. But I'd rather have that political show than the opposite. In reality, if DeSantis and Abbot would have banned government from pressuring private companies to institute these vaccine passports, it would have accomplished the same thing without this ridiculous controversy you're trying to drum up. Because companies will NOT do this on their own.
    63 replies | 812 view(s)
  • CaptUSA's Avatar
    05-13-2021, 02:15 PM
    Don't hold your breath. Once things get relegated to the "conspiracy theory" zone, they have a hard time coming back - no matter how much evidence.
    9 replies | 205 view(s)
  • CaptUSA's Avatar
    05-13-2021, 01:45 PM
    I think it's real. It's making its way through some military FB pages.
    4 replies | 133 view(s)
  • CaptUSA's Avatar
    05-13-2021, 01:35 PM
    I know you really want to remove all nuance (again to keep it in the theoretical realm), but nuance matters. First of all, this hasn't been a problem in the real world, so we are not likely to see legislation banning this. If it did become an issue, the corporate interests would line up against the ban, because they'd HAVE to ensure that it was as nearly ubiquitous as possible so that they wouldn't be driving their business to their competitors. If there was a collusion among businesses that in turn drove privacy advocates to request a ban on the practice, I'd like to see the bill to address the collusion rather than an outright ban, but that's not the real world either.
    63 replies | 812 view(s)
  • CaptUSA's Avatar
    05-13-2021, 12:57 PM
    Supposedly taken from Ft. Campbell. Apparently Jim Crow is an instruction manual.
    4 replies | 133 view(s)
  • CaptUSA's Avatar
    05-13-2021, 12:42 PM
    In the real world, I'd have to see the language of any proposed bill. In theory, businesses should be able to turn away anyone for any reason at any time. But that's not the world we're living in. Government is already forcing businesses to engage in commerce with people that they may not want to. If this fairy-tale ban you're proposing prevented government from coercing businesses to collude with each other I think I might support it.
    63 replies | 812 view(s)
  • CaptUSA's Avatar
    05-13-2021, 12:32 PM
    :rolleyes: "Do you support a government ban of private anything"???
    63 replies | 812 view(s)
  • CaptUSA's Avatar
    05-13-2021, 12:30 PM
    I am by no means a crypto expert, but any word on what the impact is to Stablecoins?? My limited understanding is that the various Stablecoins don't use mining as they're pegged to a commodity and therefore don't have the same energy needs.
    10 replies | 263 view(s)
  • cjm's Avatar
    05-13-2021, 08:47 AM
    One of my local watering holes had a "please wear mask" sign that they completely ignored from day one. They've since taken it down.
    19 replies | 617 view(s)
  • CaptUSA's Avatar
    05-12-2021, 12:17 PM
    Um... yeah - that's the point. Which answer do you want? If you want people to take your side, ask Q1. If you want them to take the opposite side, ask Q2.
    63 replies | 812 view(s)
  • CaptUSA's Avatar
    05-12-2021, 09:42 AM
    So, the left is actually supporting Cheney in this. :D Strange bedfellows indeed. There are some actively calling for her to leave the party and become a democrat, now that she has seen the light.
    87 replies | 1708 view(s)
  • CaptUSA's Avatar
    05-12-2021, 09:41 AM
    Ok, Luntz. Lol. Well, then it's all in how you phrase the question to get the poll results you want, then. "Should the tyrant's pen be able to order how a private business decides which customers to do business with?" Or "Should corporations be prevented from banding together to violate the privacy of American consumers in the name of safety?"
    63 replies | 812 view(s)
  • CaptUSA's Avatar
    05-12-2021, 09:13 AM
    Poll needs more options. In theory, I wouldn't support a ban - especially, at the federal level. But in reality, the government is so intertwined with business and commerce now. It's hard to imagine a scenario where a "vaccine passport" could remain strictly private. In theory, as a business owner, I should be able to decide to not do business with someone that doesn't live up to whatever parameters I decide. If I want them to provide proof of vaccination, I should be able to tell them to go to a competitor if they don't want to show it to me. But in reality, that's not how it would work. Because it would be in no business's interest to send away their customers over a virus that is not really that harmful, the only way a business would do this is if they could coerce their competitors to do the same. And in today's market, they will leverage government.
    63 replies | 812 view(s)
  • CaptUSA's Avatar
    05-12-2021, 07:57 AM
    You must spread some Reputation around before giving it to Occam's Banana again. "We will have no tolerance for anyone wishing to prevent this 'supply crunch' "
    82 replies | 2164 view(s)
  • CaptUSA's Avatar
    05-12-2021, 06:12 AM
    Do I hear FU Frank Luntz??
    82 replies | 2164 view(s)
  • CaptUSA's Avatar
    05-12-2021, 04:47 AM
    Pretty soon, Fauci is going to have to plead the Fifth to prevent him from "misleading Congress". When that happens, it's going to be glorious.
    19 replies | 1219 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    05-11-2021, 06:52 PM
    Good catch! The other weasel phrase is "The NIH isn't funding gain of function research in Wuhan China." Rand held his feet to the fire pretty good. The trick here is that the funding is going to researchers in the United States who then collaborate with their counterparts in China.
    19 replies | 1219 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    05-11-2021, 03:46 AM
    Good point! I thought about that. I could see the police getting involved just on her roommates' report, but they couldn't legally charge him without a statement from the victim that it was rape. I'm not sure why that detail got left out of the news segment. But here's the chilling part. "And while the judge declared the student innocent, he's not out of the woods yet. He says he now has to prove himself to a USC ethics committee that will ultimately decide whether or not he can stay here for the fall semester."
    26 replies | 690 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    05-11-2021, 03:17 AM
    Obviously more. They were at a frat party. Clearly other people were there and someone could have stumbled upon the scene. I'm not sure why that matters anyway though. At the end of the day we have people engaging in what Working Poor considers immoral behavior. Either that negates their right to claim to be a victim or it doesn't. I was raised not to get drunk in the first place. I could say regarding any woman who got drunk and passed out at a frat party and got raped "Well if you had better morals and not gotten drunk it's unlikely you would have gotten drunk so don't play Ms. Victim." Whenever I hear any of these stories I think of "Wine is a mocker and strong dring is raging and whoever is deceived thereby is not wise." Proverbs 20:1. And considering that most college students are under 21, there was probably some underage drinking which is also illegal. All of them getting drunk was really the first mistake (or "moral failure" if you will) that led to others. There are men who have been convicted of rape who honestly don't remember having sex with the rape victim because they were so drunk and the woman was so drunk she couldn't give consent. Thankfully in this case all parties were sober enough to give consent so it wasn't rape. She just regretted it the next day because it was a turn off to the guy she really wanted to date. Now here's the kicker. Maybe if she and the black man she had accused of rape had gone to a hotel room by themselves and had more "respectable" sex, she still would have had to deal with the same consequences. I have known white men who didn't want to date white women who have had sex with black men. So even in that scenario there was still the possibility of a rape accusation. In the second video I posted, the man (he looks Indian) that was accused of rape was invited by the phony rape victim to her apartment. Still not biblically "moral", but far more socially acceptable these days than drunk group sex in a bathroom. You would be hard pressed to find a man today moral enough to turn down an attractive woman inviting him to her appartment, especially after he had a few drinks. (Again, don't drink.) It is no longer socially acceptable to say to a woman who is a rape victim in those circumstances "Well you had not business going to his apartment in the first place. What did you think was going to happen?"
    26 replies | 690 view(s)
  • bv3's Avatar
    05-11-2021, 01:42 AM
    Would having recreational group sex in a bathroom at a party make it more or less likely that your hypothetical third guy shows up?
    26 replies | 690 view(s)
  • Theocrat's Avatar
    05-10-2021, 07:02 PM
    But they're "showing their cards," when they continually make statements like this about the vaccines:
    200 replies | 10804 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    05-10-2021, 06:29 PM
    You didn't answer the question. I will ask it again. Let's say the story played out exactly the same, but then a third guy game in and said "Let me get some of that" and the girl said "No way" and then he proceded to rape her, would you say she was "playing Ms. Victim?" That is a yes or no question.
    26 replies | 690 view(s)
More Activity

49 Visitor Messages

  1. View Conversation
    Please stop trying to "out" Erowe1. Let it go.
  2. I know. Like I said I was going to yank your chain but realized that in the current circumstances it would be bad taste even for me.
  3. View Conversation
    At least until every county or so willingly decided to submit to Christ, which I think will happen eventually because I'm a postmillennialist.
  4. View Conversation
    I wish things were a lot more local too. I'm really not looking for a country of 300 million at all. I think that's too big. Those who didn't want to live by Christian law could live somewhere else and choose God's judgment over his blessings.
  5. View Conversation
    And while I do believe the BIble requires civil authorities to punish homosexuality, and with death as the maximum penalty, I don't think it would be legitimate even for the government to just round up people in a gay bar.

    My reasons on the bearing arms bit are much closer to yours (resistance against tyranny.)
  6. View Conversation
    To be perfectly clear, I absolutely oppose vigilantism. I know you were joking around but I just want you to be clear on where I stand.
  7. View Conversation
    Will you kindly give a tongue lashing to the racist of the board, AmericanSpartan? Thank you. I'd like to see it.
  8. Sorry, but you have failed. That verse does not contain the words "Grace is irresistible." You can interpret it that way, but that's not what the verse says. You had to admit there was "relational language" in the Bible. Yet you have stuck to your guns that there isn't a verse that says "Have a relationship with Jesus." Likewise there is no verse that says "Grace is irresistible." If you were honest you would simply admit that. But you aren't honest.
  9. View Conversation
    Acts 13:48
    And when the Gentiles heard this, they began rejoicing and glorifying the word of the Lord, and as many as were appointed to eternal life believed.
Showing Visitor Messages 1 to 10 of 49
Page 1 of 5 123 ... LastLast
Page 1 of 5 123 ... LastLast
About jmdrake

Basic Information

Profile Sidebar Configuration

Profile Sidebar Configuration

Activist Reputation (Self-Rated):
Select if you "Stand with Rand":
I Stand with Rand (This will add a "Stand with Rand" badge by your name badge by yourr name in all posts.)
Select if you do not support Trump or Hillary.:
No Trump. No Hillary. (This will add a "None of the Above" badge by your name in all posts.)


9/11 Thermate experiments

Winston Churchhill on why the U.S. should have stayed OUT of World War I

"I am so %^&*^ sick of this cult of Ron Paul. The Paulites. What is with these %^&*^ people? Why are there so many of them?" YouTube rant by "TheAmazingAtheist"

"We as a country have lost faith and confidence in freedom." -- Ron Paul

"It can be a challenge to follow the pronouncements of President Trump, as he often seems to change his position on any number of items from week to week, or from day to day, or even from minute to minute." -- Ron Paul
Quote Originally Posted by Brian4Liberty View Post
The road to hell is paved with good intentions. No need to make it a superhighway.
Quote Originally Posted by osan View Post
The only way I see Trump as likely to affect any real change would be through martial law, and that has zero chances of success without strong buy-in by the JCS at the very minimum.


Total Posts
Total Posts
Posts Per Day
Visitor Messages
Total Messages
Most Recent Message
11-05-2016 03:40 PM
General Information
Last Activity
Today 08:38 AM
Join Date

39 Friends

  1. affa affa is offline


  2. bobbyw24 bobbyw24 is offline


  3. bv3 bv3 is offline


  4. Cap Cap is offline


  5. Captain Shays Captain Shays is offline


    Captain Shays
  6. CaptUSA CaptUSA is offline


  7. Christian Liberty
  8. cjm cjm is offline


  9. Crowish Crowish is offline


  10. DGambler DGambler is offline


Showing Friends 1 to 10 of 39
Page 1 of 4 123 ... LastLast
View jmdrake's Blog

Recent Entries

How Ron Paul could smack down Iran critics

by jmdrake on 05-15-2013 at 08:34 AM
Quote Originally Posted by jmdrake View Post
Ron needs to quit playing defense and go on offense. It's not enough to say "the Soviet Union was worse than Iran." If he could point out the following documented facts it would shut the naysayer up for good or at least make them back-peddle.

1) In 2003 Iran was the only Muslim country to help us fight and remove the Taliban from power.

See: Jane's Defense Weekly India joins anti-Taliban coalition. "India is believed to have joined Russia, the USA

Read More


The new bill of rights.

by jmdrake on 05-15-2013 at 08:33 AM
Quote Originally Posted by jmdrake View Post
This parody is an attempt to "rewrite" the bill of rights in keeping with the current application by our criminal government. Original text will be in italics followed by a list of possible options.

Amendment I

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government

Read More


Federal Reserve advised gold standard for Russia

by jmdrake on 05-15-2013 at 08:32 AM
Quote Originally Posted by jmdrake View Post
I ran across this information by accident (providence?) while looking for something else. The first link is an essay from Jude Wanniski who went with fed governor Wayne Angell to Moscow right after the collapse of the soviet union. Note that Angell advocated the new Russia to go to a gold backed currency! The second link is an online Google book from the Mises institute that talks about the same essay. I've excerpted the essay bellow. (It's too long to post directly). It's interesting to note

Read More


Washington Post 2002 : The U.S. pushed jihad on Afghan schoolchildren.

by jmdrake on 09-13-2011 at 01:15 PM
Quote Originally Posted by dannno View Post
From U.S., the ABC's of Jihad
Violent Soviet-Era Textbooks Complicate Afghan Education Efforts

By Joe Stephens and David B. Ottaway
Washington Post Staff Writers
Saturday, March 23, 2002; Page A01

In the twilight of the Cold War, the United States spent millions of dollars to supply Afghan schoolchildren with textbooks filled with violent images and militant Islamic teachings, part of covert attempts to spur resistance to the Soviet occupation.

Read More

Page 1 of 4 123 ... LastLast










  • 02:31 AM - Hidden












Page 1 of 4 123 ... LastLast


Page 1 of 306 1231151101 ... LastLast










Page 1 of 306 1231151101 ... LastLast