• ammodotcom's Avatar
    05-14-2021, 08:39 PM
    Click here to listen to the podcast! On this episode of The Resistance Library Podcast, Sam and Dave discuss the bombing of MOVE. If we told you that the Philadelphia Police Department literally dropped a bomb on a house in the city in the 1980s, you’d probably think that we had lost our minds. But, in fact, this happened on May 13, 1985, at the MOVE townhouse at 6221 Osage Avenue. The whole event was captured on camera and can easily be watched on YouTube for anyone who doubts that this happened. The case of MOVE is an unusual one, because they cannot simply be shoe-horned into the usual “they were just minding their own business and then the cops came in with overwhelming force” narrative that more or less applies at Ruby Ridge or at Waco. This is not to imply that the actions taken by the Philadelphia Police Department were appropriate – there were children inside the MOVE townhouse. However, it is important to note that MOVE had a history of violence. If nothing else, the bombing of the MOVE house in Philadelphia is an excellent example of a complicated situation with no easy answer. This is precisely what makes it worth close examination by those interested in government overreach and Second Amendment rights. You can read the full article MOVE Bombing: The Story of How Philadelphia Became "The City That Bombed Itself at Ammo.com
    0 replies | 84 view(s)
  • ammodotcom's Avatar
    05-14-2021, 08:11 PM
    Farm subsidies are perhaps the ultimate, but secret, third rail of American politics. While entitlements are discussed out in the open, farm subsidies are rarely talked about – even though they are the most expensive subsidy Washington doles out. All told, the U.S. government spends $20 billion annually on farm subsidies, with approximately 39 percent of all farms receiving some sort of subsidy. For comparison, the oil industry gets about $4.6 billion annually and annual housing subsidies total another $15 billion. A significant portion of this $20 billion goes not to your local family farm, but to Big Aggie. (Note that this $20 billion annual farm subsidy figure doesn’t take into account the 30+ years of ethanol subsidies to the corn industry nor export subsidies to U.S. farmers issued by the USDA.) The government never properly explains why this is. Certainly small farmers are growing their crops at enormous risk. However, it’s not clear that agriculture is any different than other high-risk industries – especially because the United States is blessed with some of the most fertile farmland in the world, and a highly skilled labor force. Subsidies don’t just cost taxpayers, an expense that might properly be justified by showing a return on investment. Subsidies also provide powerful disincentives against innovation, as well as cost effectiveness and diversification of land use.
    0 replies | 86 view(s)
  • ammodotcom's Avatar
    05-12-2021, 01:06 AM
    The government would like nothing better than to stop having patriotic veterans. Robots would effectively remove the biggest threat during a 4th gen revolution.
    5 replies | 175 view(s)
  • ammodotcom's Avatar
    05-08-2021, 07:03 PM
    Too generous a title to be sure. I'm going to see if we can change it to "deliberately."
    6 replies | 648 view(s)
  • ammodotcom's Avatar
    05-08-2021, 06:49 PM
    On this episode of the Resistance Library Podcast, Sam Jacobs welcomes Joe Kent onto the show. Joe Kent is a father of two, a retired Special Forces veteran and the widower of Senior Chief Petty Officer Shannon M. Kent who was killed by ISIS in Syria. Kent is currently running for Congress from the 3rd Congressional District of Washington State. We had him on to discuss his campaign, as well as the way forward for the Republican Party.
    1 replies | 97 view(s)
  • ammodotcom's Avatar
    05-07-2021, 12:04 PM
    The dust has settled and the evidence is in: The 1960s Great Society and War on Poverty programs of President Lyndon Baines Johnson (LBJ) have been a colossal and giant failure. One might make the argument that social welfare programs are the moral path for a modern government. They cannot, however, make the argument that these are in any way effective at alleviating poverty. In fact, there is evidence that such aggressive programs might make generational poverty worse. While the notion of a “culture of dependence” is a bit of a cliché in conservative circles, there is evidence that this is indeed the case – that, consciously or not, the welfare state creates a culture where people receive benefits rather than seeking gainful employment or business ownership. This is not a moral or even a value judgment against the people engaged in such a culture. Again, the claim is not that people “choose to be on welfare,” but simply that social welfare programs incentivize poverty, which has an impact on communities that has nothing to do with individual intent. We are now over 50 years into the development of the Great Society and the War on Poverty. It is time to take stock in these programs from an objective and evidence-based perspective. When one does that, it is not only clear that the programs have been a failure, but also that they have disproportionately impacted the black community in the United States. The current state of dysfunction in the black community (astronomically high crime rates, very low rates of home ownership and single motherhood as the norm) are not the natural state of the black community in the United States, but closely tied to the role that social welfare programs play. Or as Dr. Thomas Sowell stated: “If we wanted to be serious about evidence, we might compare where blacks stood a hundred years after the end of slavery with where they stood after 30 years of the liberal welfare state. In other words, we could compare hard evidence on “the legacy of slavery” with hard evidence on the legacy of liberals.”
    6 replies | 648 view(s)
  • ammodotcom's Avatar
    05-04-2021, 11:24 PM
    The reigning homecoming queen should throw her in the school dungeon. Seriously, though, how is there even a law against this?
    2 replies | 235 view(s)
  • ammodotcom's Avatar
    04-28-2021, 11:07 PM
    I used to smoke menthols. It feels like you're smoking a beautiful, tar-encrusted winter morning in New England. To deprive anyone of that pleasure would be criminal. I guess that's why the government thought they were just the one for the job.
    50 replies | 1804 view(s)
  • ammodotcom's Avatar
    04-25-2021, 01:07 AM
    Thank you for the kind words! I love the guest episodes, even if I don't get to co-host them like I usually do. Maybe getting a break from me does Sam good, though...
    2 replies | 129 view(s)
  • ammodotcom's Avatar
    04-23-2021, 03:43 PM
    On this episode of the Resistance Library Podcast, Sam Jacobs welcomes Andrew Branca onto the show. Andrew Branca is a self-defense attorney who has been covering the Derek Chauvin show trial for Legal Insurrection. In this episode, he discusses not only the trial, but also the broader social ramifications of trial by mob. Listen now to our latest guest episode!
    2 replies | 129 view(s)
  • ammodotcom's Avatar
    04-22-2021, 03:08 PM
    On this episode of the Resistance Library Podcast, Sam and Dave talk about the history of the Bedford Flag. Dating back to the early 18th century, the Bedford Flag is America’s oldest historically attested flag. Previously, historians thought the flag dated as far back as the 1660s, but this was later proven false, as the color “Prussian blue” did not exist until 1704. It looks very much like something carried into battle by medieval knights, so historians can be forgiven for looking so far back to find an origin for this flag. While the square shape evokes cavalry of old, the red color of the Bedford Flag makes it undeniably a cavalry flag. Its armored arm and sword harken back to the heraldic symbolism of the Massachusetts cavalry, which in turn dates back to the 1660s. The flag’s Latin motto VINCE AUT MORIRE (“Conquer or Die”) is strikingly similar to the motto of several Scottish and Irish clans, and the “Victory or Death” battle cry popular among the revolutionaries. Although its role in the American Revolution and the Revolutionary War is not completely certain, there is evidence to believe the flag was flown at the Battle of Concord through the diaries of Minuteman Nathaniel Page who participated in the battle.
    0 replies | 85 view(s)
  • ammodotcom's Avatar
    04-20-2021, 03:24 PM
    I'll accept that a self-driving car may drive more safely than I do, but I'll never bring myself to trust one. It will be funny to see cars driving around with just dogs inside of them, though.
    55 replies | 1593 view(s)
  • ammodotcom's Avatar
    04-19-2021, 02:43 PM
    While it’s not celebrated too widely outside of New England, Patriots’ Day (or “Patriot’s Day” if you live in Maine) is a big deal there, primarily in the state where the Battles of Lexington and Concord actually took place – Massachusetts. For anyone reading this from New England who isn’t aware: No, you’re not getting the third Monday in April off so you can stay home and watch the Boston Marathon. Even before the Declaration of Independence was written, there were the Battles of Lexington and Concord – the true beginning of the American Revolution. To be sure, this is something that had been brewing for some time. There was the Boston Massacre, the Boston Tea Party, and the Intolerable Acts. But the Battles of Lexington and Concord marked the first shots fired between Patriots and Tories, beginning what would eventually lead to the independence of the American colonies from the British Empire. While the battles began as a small skirmish, they quickly became a bona fide fight – and a bridge from which the American rebels could not walk back. Increasing Tensions in the Massachusetts Bay Colony By the time of the battles, the British occupying troops had already earned the nickname of “redcoats,” or even “devils” depending on who you spoke to. They had been occupying Boston since 1768, and due to forced quartering as well as increased resistance on the part of the colonists, the tensions between the natives and the occupying army were only growing with time.
    0 replies | 208 view(s)
No More Results
About ammodotcom

Basic Information

About ammodotcom
Ammo.com believes arming our fellow Americans – both physically and philosophically – helps them fulfill our Founding Fathers' intent with the Second Amendment: To serve as a check on state power.
Profile Sidebar Configuration

Profile Sidebar Configuration

Displayed state:
Displayed country:
Political / Activist Bio:
We believe in free speech, privacy and personal sovereignty. And that – like with gun control – unchecked expansion of state power in any of these areas deserves resistance. But while most people believe the problem is right vs. left, we believe it’s liberty vs. authoritarian.

Every round of ammo sold on our site goes to support these beliefs, which is why we voluntarily donate 1% of Ammo.com purchases to a pro-freedom organization of your choice.
Activist Reputation (Self-Rated):
Activist Reputation (Staff Rated):


"The price of freedom is eternal vigilance.” - Thomas Jefferson

Forum Friends get $20 off your $200 order - save money on bulk ammo as we donate to your favorite pro-freedom group.


Total Posts
Total Posts
Posts Per Day
General Information
Last Activity
05-15-2021 11:58 PM
Join Date
Home Page


No results to display...
Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast




















Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast