I think a general warning should be issued across the board about PLPF type tactics

dkim68 · 01-24-2008, 05:09 AM

I suspect the PLPF strategy or something like it is in place to be used on "Super Tuesday".

We need to assemble a database of all Ron Paul delegates that will be on the ballots from the "Super Tuesday" states then post the respective RP delegate names in each of the State sub-forums here.

We could take it one step further and identify all the other candidates delegates as well.

They can't screw us over then.

acroso · 01-24-2008, 05:22 AM

hmmm, We should make a pro-life, pro-family party that are uncommitted but are big time Paul donors...l

SML · 01-24-2008, 05:58 AM

Agreed with first reply. Fight fire with fire.

Though I'm convinced we can win at least some of the PL/PF delegates over.

SteveMartin · 01-24-2008, 06:23 AM

Caucus states need to be warned for sure. I warned our state coordinator all about it here in Maine last night.

btwilli1 · 01-24-2008, 07:51 AM

Just in case we should have a Pro-Life Pro-Family flyer to hand out separate from Ron Paul delegate lists, if other states do it like this.

mosquitobite · 01-24-2008, 07:55 AM

we are pro-life/pro-liberty

Liberty for all - born or unborn!

See the post linked in my signature. The knowledge about caucuses is out there but we have to seek it.

.

Anna Karenina · 01-24-2008, 09:06 AM

Caucus states should counter this situation by having both a Ron Paul slate and a Pro-Constitution/Pro-America/Pro-National Defense/Pro-Liberty/Pro-life flyer with a picture of Ronald Reagan with Ron Paul on the top and say something like "Vote For the Gipper's choice for a Strong National Defense and Strong American Economy"

Gadsden Flag · 01-24-2008, 12:54 PM

It's funny how the pro-life, pro-family people were backing Thompson, Rudy and McCain, who have been married 7 times between them. Rudy isn't even pro life, is he?

freedom-maniac · 01-24-2008, 01:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gadsden Flag

It's funny how the pro-life, pro-family people were backing Thompson, Rudy and McCain, who have been married 7 times between them. Rudy isn't even pro life, is he?

No he's not. This is just how sad they are. Why not Huck too?

acptulsa · 01-24-2008, 01:43 PM

You people seem to be missing the point. The point was to keep us from being able to declare victory by combining their votes against us, and to hold all their delegates in a trust that Ron Paul can't get at.

There are only two ways to fight this. We get voters for the other candidates pissed that their "pro-life/pro-choice" vote could be held for and given to thrice married, pro-life 9iu11iani, for example, or we get the support together to overwhelm them and get more votes than the four of them combined.

Neither being easy, we can either try to do both or simply pray that infighting causes them to break up their nasty little coalition.

The only other option I see is a lawsuit over them fielding a coalition for a position that the Constitution says must be filled by an individual, not a committee.

01-24-2008, 05:09 AM	#1
dkim68 Senior Member Join Date: Dec 2007 Posts: 735	I think a general warning should be issued across the board about PLPF type tactics I suspect the PLPF strategy or something like it is in place to be used on "Super Tuesday". We need to assemble a database of all Ron Paul delegates that will be on the ballots from the "Super Tuesday" states then post the respective RP delegate names in each of the State sub-forums here. We could take it one step further and identify all the other candidates delegates as well. They can't screw us over then. __________________

01-24-2008, 05:58 AM	#3
SML Senior Member Join Date: Nov 2007 Posts: 139	Agreed with first reply. Fight fire with fire. Though I'm convinced we can win at least some of the PL/PF delegates over. __________________ Then up with our flag! Let it stream on the air! Tho our fathers are cold in their graves, They had hands that could strike They had souls that could dare And their sons were not born to be slaves. -George Washington Cutter, E Pluribus Unum

01-24-2008, 07:55 AM	#6
mosquitobite Senior Member Join Date: Nov 2007 Location: Indiana Posts: 921	we are pro-life/pro-liberty Liberty for all - born or unborn! See the post linked in my signature. The knowledge about caucuses is out there but we have to seek it. . __________________ So you think you understand caucuses huh?! Few men have virtue enough to withstand the highest bidder. ~GEORGE WASHINGTON, letter, Aug. 17, 1779 >>>How to convince a Neo-Con to support Dr Paul<<< Thanks GunnyFreedom! >>> Ron Paul Republicans Running for Office!<<< www.schansbergforcongress.com

01-24-2008, 12:54 PM	#8
Gadsden Flag Senior Member Join Date: Jan 2008 Location: Kansas City, MO Posts: 389	It's funny how the pro-life, pro-family people were backing Thompson, Rudy and McCain, who have been married 7 times between them. Rudy isn't even pro life, is he? __________________ 'We must make the world safe for democracy'--Woodrow Wilson, 1917 'We gotta make democracy safe for the world'--Walt Kelly, 1970 If you support open debates and would like to see the Presidential Debate Commission replaced or changed, click here. Documentary: Debating the Role of Third Parties in the U.S Last edited by Gadsden Flag; 01-24-2008 at 12:58 PM.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

01-24-2008, 05:22 AM	#2
acroso Banned Join Date: Dec 2007 Posts: 1,597	hmmm, We should make a pro-life, pro-family party that are uncommitted but are big time Paul donors...l

01-24-2008, 06:23 AM	#4
SteveMartin Senior Member Join Date: Nov 2007 Location: Maine Posts: 2,183	Caucus states need to be warned for sure. I warned our state coordinator all about it here in Maine last night.

01-24-2008, 07:51 AM	#5
btwilli1 Senior Member Join Date: Jan 2008 Posts: 314	Just in case we should have a Pro-Life Pro-Family flyer to hand out separate from Ron Paul delegate lists, if other states do it like this.

01-24-2008, 09:06 AM	#7
Anna Karenina Member Join Date: Jan 2008 Posts: 36	Caucus states should counter this situation by having both a Ron Paul slate and a Pro-Constitution/Pro-America/Pro-National Defense/Pro-Liberty/Pro-life flyer with a picture of Ronald Reagan with Ron Paul on the top and say something like "Vote For the Gipper's choice for a Strong National Defense and Strong American Economy"

01-24-2008, 01:43 PM	#10
acptulsa Senior Member Join Date: Jan 2008 Posts: 16,391	You people seem to be missing the point. The point was to keep us from being able to declare victory by combining their votes against us, and to hold all their delegates in a trust that Ron Paul can't get at. There are only two ways to fight this. We get voters for the other candidates pissed that their "pro-life/pro-choice" vote could be held for and given to thrice married, pro-life 9iu11iani, for example, or we get the support together to overwhelm them and get more votes than the four of them combined. Neither being easy, we can either try to do both or simply pray that infighting causes them to break up their nasty little coalition. The only other option I see is a lawsuit over them fielding a coalition for a position that the Constitution says must be filled by an individual, not a committee.