Results 1 to 28 of 28

Thread: Former RP Staffer from 90s, Hispanic, Declares Ron Paul NOT racist

  1. #1

    Former RP Staffer from 90s, Hispanic, Declares Ron Paul NOT racist

    My husband, who is Mexican-American, worked for Ron Paul back in 1998-99. Here is what he has to say about the attempt to smear Ron Paul as a racist:


    http://stewart-rhodes.blogspot.com/2008/01/i-am-mexican-american-i-worked-for-ron.html

    I am a Mexican-American, I worked for Ron Paul in the 1990’s, and I Know that Ron Paul is No Racist!


    By Stewart Rhodes

    There is now underway a full-blown smear campaign to paint Ron Paul as a racist. First, there was the lame attempt at guilt by association, with a mere campaign contribution by some red neck racist being touted as “proof” that Ron Paul is racist. And then there were equally stupid Kevin Baconesque degrees of separation attempts to connect Ron with various so-called “hate groups.”

    Now the muckrakers are dredging up ancient, obscure newsletters written by some equally obscure ghost writing employee of Dr. Paul’s way back in the early 1990’s. This only tells me that Ron Paul is a real threat to the political establishment, and they are pulling out all the stops in an attempt to stop the Ron Paul Revolution.

    I worked for Ron Paul, in his Washington D.C. office, in 1998-99, seeing him almost every day, and saw absolutely no indication of him being racist, and in fact, I saw many reasons to know he is not racist. I am of Hispanic decent, and quite proud of it. My family on my mother’s side were migrant farm workers and my Great-Grandfather even rode with Pancho Villa. I am also part American-Indian. That heritage not only makes it rather difficult for anyone to smear me as somehow being a white racist (which is good for me if I am ever foolish enough to run for office), but also cuts against Ron Paul's supposed "ties" with white supremacists and this latest smear campaign based on what some employee of his wrote fifteen years ago.

    Not only am I outspoken about my heritage, I don’t work for racists and I would never have worked on Ron Paul’s staff if I had any suspicion whatsoever that he was "racist." And I wasn't the only staff member of "mixed race." There were several others and he never gave it a second thought. One of them was a young woman who is half Panamanian, with an obvious dark complexion. If Ron Paul were some kind of racist, who thinks non-whites are inferior, why would he hire her, or me? Was it some kind of elaborate, clever cover? No. The reason he did not care about our race is because he is a libertarian who sees people as individuals, not members of groups, racial or otherwise.

    There are many different segments of society who are drawn to a man like Ron Paul. People of a wide variety of backgrounds support him because people of a wide variety of backgrounds support liberty and have a fundamental distrust of excessive government power.

    During my time in his office, as now in the grassroots movement, there were fundamentalist Christians (and I mean really fundamentalist), working right next to proud and opinionated atheists. There were budhists, anarcho-capitalists, Big L Libertarians, objectivists, old school "Reagan" conservatives, and people of all manner of ethnic background, all working side-by-side. I have even seen gay people in those circles. They did not agree on many things, or even like each other, to be blunt, but whatever their personal background or orientation, they all saw value in working for a strict constitutionalist and a man of deep principle and courage. They were and are all part of the broader Freedom Movement – which contains a very eclectic mix of people who all share a desire for liberty. But as eclectic and diverse as his staff was in other ways, I never knew anyone on his staff to be racist, and I think it is because racists are so directly at odds with Ron Paul's philosophy of individual rights - such people just would not have fit in. Racists are collectivists, who see people as members of groups only, rather than as individuals. Such a viewpoint is fundamentally incompatible with libertarianism. As Ron Paul himself notes:

    Racism is simply an ugly form of collectivism, the mindset that views humans strictly as members of groups rather than as individuals. Racists believe that all individuals who share superficial physical characteristics are alike: as collectivists, racists think only in terms of groups.


    You can read the rest of his statement about racism at http://www.ronpaul2008.com/issues/racism/


    White Power Nazis are no exception to the rule that racists are collectivists, being, after-all, national SOCIALISTS. Such people are not only my permanent enemies because I am not pure white, as they have sworn me their enemy, they are also my ideological enemies - as much as any Marxist - because their beliefs are entirely incompatible with the concepts of individual liberty, personal self determination, and reason that is the heart of libertarianism. That makes them Ron Paul's ideological enemies as well because Ron Paul is a libertarian’s libertarian.

    But some of these collectivist racists now at least claim to support Ron Paul. Why? I suspect for the same reason the far left collectivist anti war protester does. There is something they fear or detest so much in the current Federal government that they are willing to support a man who clearly does not agree with them on fundamental philosophical principles. I'll bet the far lefty anti war protester and the White Power skin head consider each-other mortal enemies, but they both support the same man for very similar reasons. Fear of excessive government power, and a desire to return to more limited government under the Constitution makes for strange political combinations sometimes.

    If Ron Paul is somehow racist because some racists support him, does that make him a socialist lefty hippy because some far left anti war hippy supports him? Does it make the lefty hippy a racist too, because he supports Ron right along with the skin-head? There are also gay people who support Ron Paul. Does that make him gay? Does that make the Nazi guy gay too, or a "gay lover" because he also supports Ron? No, of course not.

    People from all of those backgrounds support Ron Paul because they all have a desire to return to Constitutional government. Though they don't agree with Ron Paul on everything, they fear what comes from unconstitutional government.

    It would be absurd to say that the Constitution and Bill of Rights are racist, gay, atheist, socialist, or whatever because people of those persuasions value and support those documents. The same is true for Dr. Paul because he is the Champion of the Constitution. What they really support is not a man, as much as it is the Constitution itself.

    It seems that even racist dumb asses prefer the Constitution, at least for now (that is how dangerous the federal government has gotten!). I have my suspicions about their professed devotion to the Constitution, since their world view really is so collectivist, but I'm not going to reject the Constitution or Ron Paul just because the racist idiots don't realize that a restoration of the Constitution will not get them to their mythical "White America" like they may hope. What it will do is get us all to a place of liberty and justice for all, and the racists can then whither away like the outdated fools they are.

    The latest smear against Ron Paul stemming from the old newsletters written by some employee.

    Despite the fact that racism is incompatible with libertarianism, I have in fact known some people (thankfully few) who like to call themselves libertarians who are racist - there are stupid bigots in any movement –and just as we have seen that there are even some self-professed racists who express support for Ron Paul, it would not surprise me if at some point in Ron Paul’s long career in the Freedom Movement such a closet, collectivist racist was able to worm his way into working for Ron.

    Ron Paul does not interrogate all of his new hires on their view on race. In hindsight we can say that he should have been more careful in monitoring what his employees wrote, and no doubt he has since become far more careful about watching what goes out with his name on it. But Ron Paul, being a sincere libertarian, is a very hands-off kind of guy, as Tucker Carlson noted in his recent article, and perhaps a bit too trusting that the people who work for him will be consistent, principled libertarians just as he is.

    As I noted above, that is usually a fair and accurate assumption, and I never heard one racist comment from any staff. But it is certainly possible that one or two racist jerks slipped through the crack. As I said, every movement has its idiots. As a case in point, look at Eric Dondero who used to work for Ron but after 9-11 transformed into a raving Kool-Aid drinking, Bush cheerleading, warmongering neocon when it comes to the war on terror. Who would have known he was such a raving maniac? No doubt about it, that idiot had to have said, written, or did something embarrassing to Ron while he worked for him as well.

    I have seen nothing, in all my interactions with Ron Paul, to ever suggest to me that he himself is racist. To the contrary, I have every reason to know he is not. And the same goes for his supposed hatred of gays. That is also total hogwash. Ron Paul does not care what someone is. He sees us all as individuals with God given rights. If you value liberty and the Constitution, then you are Ron Paul’s brother or sister in liberty, whatever your color, creed, or sexual preference.

    This smear campaign reminds me of how the whole militia movement of the 1990’s was smeared as racist, even when some of the leadership in that movement was non-white. It also reminds me of how the Branch Davidians were portrayed by the media as being a bunch of religious extremist white people with guns (with the not so subtle implication that they too were racist) when there were in fact many blacks, hispanics, and asians among them, and many mixed-race marriages and children. But the facts never stop the media or the wanna-be media in the blogosphere. Racism in general, and especially anti-semitism, has always been the smear of choice against the Freedom Movement.

    This is just a desperate attempt by a desperate establishment to silence this resurgent freedom movement by smearing Ron Paul with the same old smear of choice, racism.

    Stewart Rhodes

    Yale Law graduate, veteran, Mexican-American, and proud former Ron Paul staffer
    Last edited by ThatGirlTasha; 01-11-2008 at 03:05 AM.



  2. Remove this section of ads by registering.
  3. #2
    bump...spread it guys
    R[∃vo˩]ution

    I believe the very heart and soul of conservatism is libertarianism. -Ronald Reagan

  4. #3
    Hey I am a Mexican-American as well and I support Ron Paul. Thanks for sticking up for Dr. Paul. Its always nice to see people stick up for others when they are being slandered by haters.

  5. #4
    Send it to lew to publish on his site Tasha.

    lewrockwell@mac.com
    “I would rather be exposed to the inconveniences attending too much liberty than to those attending too small a degree of it.” - Thomas Jefferson

  6. #5
    Quote Originally Posted by angrydragon View Post
    Send it to lew to publish on his site Tasha.

    lewrockwell@mac.com
    email sent on Tasha's behalf...should we send multiple emails?

    One down if so.
    R[∃vo˩]ution

    I believe the very heart and soul of conservatism is libertarianism. -Ronald Reagan

  7. #6

  8. #7
    Very well written. Thank you.
    *************************************


    Matthew Chapters 23 + 24

  9. #8



  10. Remove this section of ads by registering.
  11. #9
    Nice post.
    Ron Paul's best political writing? (link)

    "The human race divides politically into those who want people to be controlled and those who have no such desire."
    -Robert A. Heinlein

  12. #10

  13. #11
    Send it to lew to publish on his site Tasha.

    lewrockwell@mac.com
    Got it, and sent email. Thanks

  14. #12
    Quote Originally Posted by hillertexas View Post
    email sent on Tasha's behalf...should we send multiple emails?

    One down if so.
    Hey thanks for sending the email-I sent one too.

  15. #13
    So where is courtney, rjo43084, and the other "racism" trolls in this thread? Too busy trying to spread doubts I suppose.

  16. #14
    Quote Originally Posted by JahWarrior View Post
    So where is courtney, rjo43084, and the other "racism" trolls in this thread? Too busy trying to spread doubts I suppose.
    O no I'm right here buddy...

  17. #15
    bump

    well, you'd think if there's something to this, and I know there's not, you'd think Al Sharpton would be all over this eh? For Pete's sake this newsletter thing is beyond ridiculous.
    The more laws and order are made prominent,
    The more thieves and robbers there will be.
    ~Lao-tzu

    "Do not believe anything because it is said by an authority, or if it is said to come from angels, or from Gods, or from an inspired source. Believe it only if you have explored it in your own heart and mind and body and found it to be true."~ Buddha

  18. #16
    long but well worth the time to read!
    It's good to hear from people who have worked with Ron Paul.


    don't forget to digg this article and make it popular
    Last edited by Itzsoez; 01-11-2008 at 03:31 PM.



  19. Remove this section of ads by registering.
  20. #17
    rjo43084
    Banned

    you can be banned and still leave messages?

  21. #18

  22. #19

  23. #20

    so complex it's best not to discuss!

    That was a great piece. I have been personally wrestling with this issue the past few days since the 'hit piece' at TNR came out. I tried writing a longer response to this in another thread and the system logged me out just as I was about to end, so will take that as a sign to keep it short.

    Briefly put, I think there is a difference between 'positive' and 'negative' racism, but only the latter is referenced when the word is used nowadays. I see nothing wrong with collective pride, including Blacks being proud of being Black, Jews of being Jews and Whites of being White. All peoples have skeletons in their closets, and all peoples have great abundant inherent goodness, both individually and collectively.

    The fact is, rightly or wrongly, it is impossible for Whites to get together as such nowadays even though it is fine to form Womens' Groups, Black Groups and so forth. This is a double standard.

    My suspicion is that Paul might be a soft 'positive' racist in that he might well favor collectives being based on local communities and regional cultures some of which might end up forming themselves around certain faiths or ethnicities and that would be fine. It has nothing to do with undermining or annihilating other races or collectives. But even if he is, this sort of 'racism' is not what is meant by the word today, so any discussion along these lines is pointless during an election campaign.

    This sort of thing cannot be discussed rationally in today's 'multicultural' 'liberal' climate so I believe Paul is sending us all the right message on this:

    DON"T DISCUSS IT. He is not bringing this forward as part of his platform just as he is not discussing concerns about AIPAC.

    Just like it is stupid to bring 9/11 conspiracies into the campaign. Yes, there are excellent grounds for doubt but in the media such issues are just too easy to smear and distort and so they won't do any good, only harm, to bring up.

    His larger campaign platform deals with all these things by going to the deeper, broader problems that transcend such particular manifestations: freedom, a constitutionally mandated republic based on the freedom of its citizens to form and maintain their own family, local community and State culture not beholden to Central Authority from afar. This is the country that was set up originally; it is still a good idea and, interestingly enough, because of modern technology it is far more practical and workable than was the case before.

    Anyway. I think it best not to engage in overly long debates about it. Those who want to paint him as a bigot and racist have the ammunition to do so. Those newsletters were a big mistake. They are out there and you cannot erase what was written in his name. But those who think deeper about it can continue to support the campaign and the message understanding that such message strikes at the heart of many forces at play today and that it is impossible to go forward without stepping on many toes, including those who espouse blanket liberal multiculturalism at the expense of personal and collective liberty.

  24. #21
    I feel like this needs to be bumped again.

  25. #22
    why is this in "bad media reporting?"
    Lack of planning on your part does not constitute an emergency on my part.

  26. #23
    Quote Originally Posted by NinjaPirate View Post
    why is this in "bad media reporting?"
    Well it's a response to the bad media reporting. I think people who are checking out this section for the first time should have the opportunity to read it.

  27. #24
    This issue is clearly not dying, so BUMP!
    Btw... it's not necessarily a good idea to go trolling for bad news about Ron Paul, giving the smearers more traffic, but if you do, and they're calling him a racist, post something like this:

    An important character witness has come forward. You've already judged Ron Paul guilty without a trial. If you have any decency, you will read this:

    http://stewart-rhodes.blogspot.com/2...d-for-ron.html



  28. Remove this section of ads by registering.
  29. #25
    bump again in case anyone hasn't seen this.

  30. #26
    I'm going to keep this bumped until the story goes away.

  31. #27

  32. #28



Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 8
    Last Post: 04-25-2014, 11:39 PM
  2. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 04-25-2014, 04:57 PM
  3. Replies: 3
    Last Post: 05-18-2012, 11:50 AM
  4. PROOF Anti-Racist/Racist Conspiracy/Ron Paul
    By Heavy Fed in forum U.S. Political News
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 01-27-2008, 06:58 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •