Ron Paul REALLY placed 3rd

dreamcast65 · 01-04-2008, 03:37 PM

This election in Iowa was rigged. They took RP's votes away from him for a brief period and gave them to Rudy, then they took them away from Rudy but never gave them back to Paul! Plus there is still 5% that is unreported, which is completely absurd. The Dems election should have taken twice the time of ours and look what is happening. I believe that Paul really placed 3rd and they might have to admit to it which is why it is taking so long to get the complete official results.

RonPaulFTFW · 01-04-2008, 03:38 PM

if its true the campaign should be looking into it.

Oddball · 01-04-2008, 03:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dreamcast65

This election in Iowa was rigged. They took RP's votes away from him for a brief period and gave them to Rudy, then they took them away from Rudy but never gave them back to Paul! Plus there is still 5% that is unreported, which is completely absurd. The Dems election should have taken twice the time of ours and look what is happening. I believe that Paul really placed 3rd and they might have to admit to it which is why it is taking so long to get the complete official results.

Source, please??

Stealth4 · 01-04-2008, 03:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dreamcast65

This election in Iowa was rigged. They took RP's votes away from him for a brief period and gave them to Rudy, then they took them away from Rudy but never gave them back to Paul! Plus there is still 5% that is unreported, which is completely absurd. The Dems election should have taken twice the time of ours and look what is happening. I believe that Paul really placed 3rd and they might have to admit to it which is why it is taking so long to get the complete official results.

The unreported 5% is absurd, but who gave votes to Guiliani (was it the iowa GOP or a media mistake?) and how do you know those votes came from Paul?

Details?

IamRealPerson · 01-04-2008, 03:40 PM

this thread is not helping.....

Trance Dance Master · 01-04-2008, 03:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RonPaulFTFW

if its true the campaign should be looking into it.

The campaign will continue fighting the war of attrition. We will win it.

jillian · 01-04-2008, 03:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dreamcast65

This election in Iowa was rigged. They took RP's votes away from him for a brief period and gave them to Rudy, then they took them away from Rudy but never gave them back to Paul! Plus there is still 5% that is unreported, which is completely absurd. The Dems election should have taken twice the time of ours and look what is happening. I believe that Paul really placed 3rd and they might have to admit to it which is why it is taking so long to get the complete official results.

I agree with you. I don't know if I would go as far to say he placed third. But I most definetely believe that there were votes manipulated.

This is very unsettling. Iowa is the most authentic of all States when it comes to tallying votes. We have a lot of work to do.

SteveMartin · 01-04-2008, 03:42 PM

They gave 3000 votes to Rudy from one county, and corrected the error 20 minutes later. They probably just added a "0" by accident. I watched carefully, and when the corrections came on the screen it was clear that they did not go to opponents. Those were not Ron Paul votes. They were phantom votes.

guntherg16 · 01-04-2008, 03:42 PM

USAElectionpolls is showing the good Doctor as virtually tied for 3rd.

http://www.usaelectionpolls.com/2008...010408001.html

ItsTime · 01-04-2008, 03:43 PM

No the votes were on the up and up

01-04-2008, 03:37 PM	#1
dreamcast65 Member Join Date: Nov 2007 Posts: 66	Ron Paul REALLY placed 3rd This election in Iowa was rigged. They took RP's votes away from him for a brief period and gave them to Rudy, then they took them away from Rudy but never gave them back to Paul! Plus there is still 5% that is unreported, which is completely absurd. The Dems election should have taken twice the time of ours and look what is happening. I believe that Paul really placed 3rd and they might have to admit to it which is why it is taking so long to get the complete official results.

01-04-2008, 03:42 PM	#9
guntherg16 Senior Member Join Date: Jun 2007 Location: New York Posts: 311	USAElectionpolls is showing the good Doctor as virtually tied for 3rd. http://www.usaelectionpolls.com/2008...010408001.html __________________ State of New York - 24th Congressional District

01-04-2008, 03:43 PM	#10
ItsTime Senior Member Join Date: Sep 2007 Location: NH Posts: 10,071	No the votes were on the up and up __________________ American people work for their money banks fail for theirs. Me 2008. "It does not require a majority to prevail, but rather an irate, tireless minority keen to set brush fires in people's minds." Sam Adams "Truth is Treason in an Empire of Lies" Ron Paul The Revolution: A Manifesto Start working for 2010 elections! Please donate to RAND PAUL

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

01-04-2008, 03:38 PM	#2
RonPaulFTFW Banned Join Date: Nov 2007 Location: Raleigh NC Posts: 1,868	if its true the campaign should be looking into it.

01-04-2008, 03:40 PM	#5
IamRealPerson Member Join Date: Dec 2007 Posts: 35	this thread is not helping.....

01-04-2008, 03:42 PM	#8
SteveMartin Senior Member Join Date: Nov 2007 Location: Maine Posts: 2,183	They gave 3000 votes to Rudy from one county, and corrected the error 20 minutes later. They probably just added a "0" by accident. I watched carefully, and when the corrections came on the screen it was clear that they did not go to opponents. Those were not Ron Paul votes. They were phantom votes.