Liberty Forest
 

Go Back   Liberty Forest Other Archive Grassroots Projects Fox Boycott
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Chat Room [7] Mark Forums Read

milliondollarmoneybomb.com

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes

Join the Free State Project

For Liberty Movie    Liberty Forest Store

Old 12-29-2007, 07:52 AM   #1
TomTX
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 71
Default Hit Fox in the OTHER place it hurts: FCC Approvals.

I'm actually surprised that I haven't seen this tactic posted yet. Along with advertisers, this is the other major weakness of broadcasters/networks.

The other critical items we can influence directly are the FCC broadcast license for each affiliate, AND FCC approval for station purchases/mergers/trades. By specifically targeting FCC approvals, your comments will have a LOT more long-term weight. Endangering the local affiliate's license with enough negative comments in the right way will change their attitude from "It's the network, nothing we can do" and largely ignoring you to actually calling the NewsCorp on your behalf saying "OMG, fix this NOW!"

Remember, the FCC threatened to hit EACH broadcast station with a 6-figure fine for the half-second "wardrobe malfunction" at the SuperBowl*.

Key trigger phrases:

"FCC Public File"
"Not acting in the public interest"

1) At the beginning of EACH email or FAX to an affiliate (actual broadcaster, not the network) ask that the comment be placed in their "FCC Public File." They are required to comply with your request.

This "Public File" is reviewed by the FCC each time that station's license is up for renewal. Not getting a license renewed means the station is worthless.

Give your opinion that the broadcaster is "Not acting in the public interest" and give detailed reasoning.

We can specifically start slamming each affiliate under the FCC "Equal Time Rule."

http://www.museum.tv/archives/etv/E/...qualtimeru.htm
http://www.fcc.gov/eb/broadcast/pif.html


2) Comment to the FCC directly on media ownership:

http://gullfoss2.fcc.gov/ecfs/Upload/

Check next to "Media Ownership Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking - Docket 06-121 "

1-888-CALL-FCC (1-888-225-5322)
1-866-418-0232 FAX: toll-free

Federal Communications Commission
445 12th Street, SW
Washington, DC 20554

Chairman Kevin J. Martin: KJMWEB@fcc.gov
Commissioner Michael J. Copps: Michael.Copps@fcc.gov
Commissioner Jonathan S. Adelstein: Jonathan.Adelstein@fcc.gov
Commissioner Deborah Taylor Tate: dtaylortateweb@fcc.gov
Commissioner Robert McDowell: Robert.McDowell@fcc.gov

...and make sure to comment how NewsCorp is "acting against the public interest."

-TomTX

*This was later reduced to only hitting the direct-owned stations. Other events such as the "Without a Trace" teen orgy did fine affiliates directly at 5 figures.
TomTX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-29-2007, 07:58 AM   #2
freedom-maniac
Senior Member
 
freedom-maniac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: MI
Posts: 2,217
Default

Holy Crap! This is genious for taking down Fox, but when is their license renewed? The end of the year I hope.
__________________
"...he who would enslave others ends only by chaining himself, for chains have two ends..." Robert F. Kennedy

"Every marijuana smoker or pimp in prison uses a cell that could have been occupied by a mugger, a rapist, or child molester." Harry Browne

R[ƎVO˩]UTION!
freedom-maniac is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-29-2007, 07:59 AM   #3
Kingfisher
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,003
Default

The FCC is part of the Regime
Kingfisher is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-29-2007, 08:03 AM   #4
TomTX
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 71
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by freedom-maniac View Post
Holy Crap! This is genious for taking down Fox, but when is their license renewed? The end of the year I hope.
License renewals are on a continuous, rolling basis for each local broadcaster.

However, your comments MUST stay in the public file - and there are rarely very many of them.

Several dozen (hundred?) negative comments in each affiliate's public file WILL scare them.
TomTX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-29-2007, 08:07 AM   #5
Castrensis
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: MI
Posts: 194
Default

Quote:
Since 1959, the FCC has provided a number of interpretations to Section 315's exemptions. Presidential press conferences have been labeled on-the-spot news, even if the president uses his remarks to bolster his campaign. Since the 1970s, debates have also been considered on-the-spot news events and therefore exempt from the equal time law. This has enabled stations or other parties arranging the debates to choose which candidates to include in a debate.
Link
Castrensis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-29-2007, 08:08 AM   #6
mosquitobite
Senior Member
 
mosquitobite's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Indiana
Posts: 921
Default

Explain what you mean by affiliate? Our local Fox station?
__________________

Few men have virtue enough to withstand the highest bidder. ~GEORGE WASHINGTON, letter, Aug. 17, 1779

>>>How to convince a Neo-Con to support Dr Paul<<< Thanks GunnyFreedom!
>>> Ron Paul Republicans Running for Office!<<<

www.schansbergforcongress.com
mosquitobite is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-29-2007, 08:32 AM   #7
Think12345
Senior Member
 
Think12345's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 305
Default

I think this might just work!
5 stars to this thread.
Think12345 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-29-2007, 08:41 AM   #8
TomTX
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 71
Default

Yes, we have a bit of an uphill battle with the "debate exception" to the equal time rule.

1) This is NOT a debate. It is a "roundtable discussion"

2) Modern "debates" are VERY different from the original exception 30+ years ago. Originally, media was just reporting "on the spot news" for an event organized by an independent third party, such as the League of Women Voters.

Today, debates are being run by the media themselves and therefore by my reasoning are NOT "on the spot news"


Affiliate: The local broadcast station in or near your town, such as "KTBC Austin Fox Channel 7". "Fox" is the national Network which produces much of the content. "KTBC Channel 7" is the local broadcaster in Austin affiliated with Fox, who owns the transmitter in Austin broadcasting Channel 7 to your TV and re-broadcasting the content produced by the Fox Network, plus their own local news, weather and such. "KTBC" is the unique set of call letters assigned by the FCC. Each local station has their own license from the FCC.
TomTX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-29-2007, 08:46 AM   #9
robertwerden
Senior Member
 
robertwerden's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Liberty Hill, TEXAS
Posts: 861
Default

What about the blow back to Ron on this?
__________________
Watch my Ron Paul Videos http://www.youtube.com/profile?user=...xPresident2008
robertwerden is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-29-2007, 08:50 AM   #10
TomTX
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 71
Default

The campaign was pretty clearly behind a strong grassroots response with their PR release.
TomTX is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:20 AM.




RSS feed from RonPaulForums.com RSS feed from RonPaulForums.com


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Powered by NuWiki v1.3 RC1 Copyright ©2006-2007, NuHit, LLC

Top
Ron Paul Sites