Plane makes Emergency Landing, Ron Paul onboard.

[stormcommander]

Originally Posted by Scofield

Lee Harvey Oswald was behind JFK when he supposedly shot him with that final bullet. However, if you watch the Zapruder film, you can see clear as day, JFK's face is essentially ripped off and his head flung backward.

A bullet to the back of the head does not sling-shot your head backwards. Thus, it is physically impossible for Oswald to have made that shot.

prove it. show me something scientific

[Scofield]

Originally Posted by stormcommander

prove it. show me something scientific

Prove to me Oswald was the killer.

show me something scientific.

[torchbearer]

Originally Posted by Scofield

Prove to me Oswald was the killer.

show me something scientific.

they can prove that much.

[stormcommander]

the not-so magic bullet

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ikIRB3lvFvw

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2kEh3Kgwhk0

also, the head going back - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=62gvoKyODu4

[Ninja Homer]

It bugs me when conspiracy theorists claim to know that something (9/11, JFK, whatever) was a conspiracy without having absolute proof.

However, it bugs me even more when these anti-conspiracy theorists are too chicken shit to even let other people discuss the possibility that something may be a conspiracy. They are so afraid that their little eggshell of a pseudo-secure reality where their government loves them, is looking out for them, and wants them to be wealthy, healthy, and happy will get cracked, that they will do everything within their power to dismiss facts and stop conversation that may lead to the mere possibility of a conspiracy.

If a time came where US citizens were being trucked off, I'd much rather be surrounded by truthers than these pussies who would continue to insist, "There's no conspiracy, everything's fine, the government is just looking out for our best interests."

I try to remain open to both sides of any conspiracy theory. It's rare to find 100% proof in either direction. To suggest that we can't even discuss the possibility that there's a conspiracy is absolutely ridiculous.

[Pimpin Turtle Dot Com]

Originally Posted by Ninja Homer

It bugs me when conspiracy theorists claim to know that something (9/11, JFK, whatever) was a conspiracy without having absolute proof.

However, it bugs me even more when these anti-conspiracy theorists are too chicken shit to even let other people discuss the possibility that something may be a conspiracy. They are so afraid that their little eggshell of a pseudo-secure reality where their government loves them, is looking out for them, and wants them to be wealthy, healthy, and happy will get cracked, that they will do everything within their power to dismiss facts and stop conversation that may lead to the mere possibility of a conspiracy.

If a time came where US citizens were being trucked off, I'd much rather be surrounded by truthers than these pussies who would continue to insist, "There's no conspiracy, everything's fine, the government is just looking out for our best interests."

I try to remain open to both sides of any conspiracy theory. It's rare to find 100% proof in either direction. To suggest that we can't even discuss the possibility that there's a conspiracy is absolutely ridiculous.

Booyah Ninja Homer, exactly... I love this quote.. "If a time came where US citizens were being trucked off, I'd much rather be surrounded by truthers than these pussies who would continue to insist, "There's no conspiracy, everything's fine, the government is just looking out for our best interests.""

Going into my all-time favorite quote book...

But you are right... no one knows for sure about anything that is why it is important that ALL perspectives and viewpoints are discussed rather then only one (which might not be right)

[torchbearer]

Originally Posted by Ninja Homer

It bugs me when conspiracy theorists claim to know that something (9/11, JFK, whatever) was a conspiracy without having absolute proof.

However, it bugs me even more when these anti-conspiracy theorists are too chicken shit to even let other people discuss the possibility that something may be a conspiracy. They are so afraid that their little eggshell of a pseudo-secure reality where their government loves them, is looking out for them, and wants them to be wealthy, healthy, and happy will get cracked, that they will do everything within their power to dismiss facts and stop conversation that may lead to the mere possibility of a conspiracy.

If a time came where US citizens were being trucked off, I'd much rather be surrounded by truthers than these pussies who would continue to insist, "There's no conspiracy, everything's fine, the government is just looking out for our best interests."

I try to remain open to both sides of any conspiracy theory. It's rare to find 100% proof in either direction. To suggest that we can't even discuss the possibility that there's a conspiracy is absolutely ridiculous.

Who said you couldn't discuss conspiracy?

[Pimpin Turtle Dot Com]

Originally Posted by torchbearer

Who said you couldn't discuss conspiracy?

A lot of people are anti-conspiracy prone on this forum...

[stormcommander]

A lot of people are anti-conspiracy prone on this forum...

The only thing I'm against is a failure (by the the theorist) to look at facts and research of the theorist's opposing view... and then the theorist claims he is absolutely positive. Ridiculous! For example, no one has responded to the three videos I presented.

[Mark]

No matter what your take is on 9/11, it is strange that the wreckage from Flight 93, (crash in Shanksville, Pa)
was scattered over 3-4 miles in little pieces, and that very little of that debris was at the hole in the ground.

Can someone explain to me how a plane that is crashed on purpose, like what we're told happened, left debris over a 3-4 mile radius?

Don't plane crashes usually have a concentration of wreckage at the area of impact? That didn't happen in Shanksville.


"No plane at shanksville.." 2:22
http://nz.youtube.com/watch?v=g2cIhAsXjUA