Page 6 of 6 FirstFirst ... 456
Results 151 to 165 of 165

Thread: Inside the mind of a "law and order" Republican

  1. #151
    Enforcing law doesn't necessarily require a formal, government body.
    Quote Originally Posted by TheCount View Post
    ...I believe that when the government is capable of doing a thing, it will.
    Quote Originally Posted by Influenza View Post
    which one of yall fuckers wrote the "ron paul" racist news letters
    Quote Originally Posted by Dforkus View Post
    Zippy's posts are a great contribution.




    Disrupt, Deny, Deflate. Read the RPF trolls' playbook here (post #3): http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthr...eptive-members



  2. Remove this section of ads by registering.
  3. #152
    Quote Originally Posted by NorthCarolinaLiberty View Post
    One problem I observe is that many people don't even bother to separate the two words "law" and "order." People put them together, as if they're inseparable. I don't hear people digging deep enough to discuss the differences. Most of today's new legislation and regulation is about order, not about law.

    Laws occur naturally; Law has been around for eons. Do not murder. Do not steal. Man doesn't invent laws. Law precedes man. You don't need people who think they are so smart as to declare eureka, and then pretend they came up with something the rest of us did not know about.

    Order code that has nothing to do with law:

    consensual drug use and purchasing
    smoking in a restaurant
    occupational licensing
    home schooling regs
    Obama "Care"
    minimum wage
    seatbelt & helmet code
    police roadblocks
    marriage
    gambling
    gun statutes
    rent stabilization/control
    eminent domain
    paid work family leave
    blue "laws"
    happy hour legislation
    assisted suicide
    firework selling restrictions
    asset forfeiture
    campaign contribution statutes
    cable TV regulation
    raw milk selling
    trans-fat food bans
    Etc, etc, etc, etc
    So all laws come from God and therefore must all be just and fair since none were created by man. Or are they created by the Devil? What is their true source?

    (I disagree- all laws aside from laws of physics are created by man).



  4. Remove this section of ads by registering.
  5. #153
    Quote Originally Posted by NorthCarolinaLiberty View Post
    Enforcing law doesn't necessarily require a formal, government body.
    How does one encourage compliance with laws? If you want me to obey one of your laws, how can you prevent me from violating it? A law without enforcement capabilities is a useless law. More of a "suggestion" really.

  6. #154
    Quote Originally Posted by Zippyjuan View Post
    How does one encourage compliance with laws? If you want me to obey one of your laws, how can you prevent me from violating it? A law without enforcement capabilities is a useless law. More of a "suggestion" really.
    Natural law.

    Which is a "physical" law - Equal and opposite reaction.

    Don't threaten to hurt me or my family, or I'll turn your head into a canoe.


  7. #155
    Quote Originally Posted by Anti Federalist View Post
    Natural law.

    Which is a "physical" law - Equal and opposite reaction.

    Don't threaten to hurt me or my family, or I'll turn your head into a canoe.

    That's nice. But I have one of these- can you still enforce your laws?


  8. #156
    Quote Originally Posted by nikcers View Post
    These systemic problems in society can't be fixed by government because they are caused by government. You can't remove the law though without removing the government otherwise there will be tyranny.
    Well yeah....

  9. #157
    Quote Originally Posted by Zippyjuan View Post
    So all laws come from God and therefore must all be just and fair since none were created by man. Or are they created by the Devil? What is their true source?

    (I disagree- all laws aside from laws of physics are created by man).

    So if a group of men suddenly declared murder as alright, then you'd be okay with that?
    Quote Originally Posted by TheCount View Post
    ...I believe that when the government is capable of doing a thing, it will.
    Quote Originally Posted by Influenza View Post
    which one of yall fuckers wrote the "ron paul" racist news letters
    Quote Originally Posted by Dforkus View Post
    Zippy's posts are a great contribution.




    Disrupt, Deny, Deflate. Read the RPF trolls' playbook here (post #3): http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthr...eptive-members

  10. #158
    Quote Originally Posted by Zippyjuan View Post
    That's nice. But I have one of these- can you still enforce your laws?


    Yes. I have one too.
    Quote Originally Posted by TheCount View Post
    ...I believe that when the government is capable of doing a thing, it will.
    Quote Originally Posted by Influenza View Post
    which one of yall fuckers wrote the "ron paul" racist news letters
    Quote Originally Posted by Dforkus View Post
    Zippy's posts are a great contribution.




    Disrupt, Deny, Deflate. Read the RPF trolls' playbook here (post #3): http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthr...eptive-members

  11. #159
    Quote Originally Posted by Zippyjuan View Post
    How does one encourage compliance with laws? If you want me to obey one of your laws, how can you prevent me from violating it?
    If you try to kill me, then I can pull a gun and try to stop you. Law of self defense. All animals have a built-in survival instinct.
    Quote Originally Posted by TheCount View Post
    ...I believe that when the government is capable of doing a thing, it will.
    Quote Originally Posted by Influenza View Post
    which one of yall fuckers wrote the "ron paul" racist news letters
    Quote Originally Posted by Dforkus View Post
    Zippy's posts are a great contribution.




    Disrupt, Deny, Deflate. Read the RPF trolls' playbook here (post #3): http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthr...eptive-members

  12. #160
    Quote Originally Posted by Zippyjuan View Post
    How does one encourage compliance with laws? If you want me to obey one of your laws, how can you prevent me from violating it? A law without enforcement capabilities is a useless law. More of a "suggestion" really.
    When a community passes and enforces its own laws everything is grand...

    When Fed-Gov wants to pass and enforce laws remotely everything is askew...Same for many states....

    Laws and law enforcement must revert to local, directly influenced by the citizens, endeavors....And some, many even, will run afoul of this feel good everybody is equal BS that we have now....

    Out here in the Ozarks we have very little in common with those in Ca., why should we try to enforce our laws and beliefs on the libs? Or why should they try to enforce theirs on us?

    And this isn't even taking into account the city/country disparity...



  13. Remove this section of ads by registering.
  14. #161
    Quote Originally Posted by tod evans View Post
    When a community passes and enforces its own laws everything is grand...

    When Fed-Gov wants to pass and enforce laws remotely everything is askew...Same for many states....

    Laws and law enforcement must revert to local, directly influenced by the citizens, endeavors....And some, many even, will run afoul of this feel good everybody is equal BS that we have now....

    Out here in the Ozarks we have very little in common with those in Ca., why should we try to enforce our laws and beliefs on the libs? Or why should they try to enforce theirs on us?

    And this isn't even taking into account the city/country disparity...
    Isn't that government?

    should we try to enforce our laws and beliefs on the libs? Or why should they try to enforce theirs on us?
    Even in a community there are those who do not agree with the laws and beliefs. Should even that community be able to pass and enforce laws? Or should everything be lawless?

  15. #162
    Quote Originally Posted by Zippyjuan View Post
    Isn't that government?


    Even in a community there are those who do not agree with the laws and beliefs. Should even that community be able to pass and enforce laws? Or should everything be lawless?
    I don't think putting Kalief Browder in jail for years without trial is lawful so I just would have to disagree on what lawless means.

  16. #163
    Quote Originally Posted by Zippyjuan View Post
    Or should everything be lawless?

    "Everything?" A little hyperbolic, wouldn't you say?



    ...lawless?
    Another misnomer. Rescinding statutes does not make law disappear.
    Quote Originally Posted by TheCount View Post
    ...I believe that when the government is capable of doing a thing, it will.
    Quote Originally Posted by Influenza View Post
    which one of yall fuckers wrote the "ron paul" racist news letters
    Quote Originally Posted by Dforkus View Post
    Zippy's posts are a great contribution.




    Disrupt, Deny, Deflate. Read the RPF trolls' playbook here (post #3): http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthr...eptive-members

  17. #164
    Quote Originally Posted by Zippyjuan View Post
    Isn't that government?
    Yup.

    Albeit small enough every resident affected could affect the government.

    Quote Originally Posted by Zippyjuan View Post
    Even in a community there are those who do not agree with the laws and beliefs. Should even that community be able to pass and enforce laws? Or should everything be lawless?
    Of course the community should be able to pass and institute laws, I addressed that very plainly;

    Laws and law enforcement must revert to local, directly influenced by the citizens, endeavors....And some, many even, will run afoul of this feel good everybody is equal BS that we have now....

  18. #165
    Quote Originally Posted by NorthCarolinaLiberty View Post
    One problem I observe is that many people don't even bother to separate the two words "law" and "order." People put them together, as if they're inseparable. I don't hear people digging deep enough to discuss the differences. Most of today's new legislation and regulation is about order, not about law.

    Laws occur naturally; Law has been around for eons. Do not murder. Do not steal. Man doesn't invent laws. Law precedes man. You don't need people who think they are so smart as to declare eureka, and then pretend they came up with something the rest of us did not know about.

    Order code that has nothing to do with law:

    consensual drug use and purchasing
    smoking in a restaurant
    occupational licensing
    home schooling regs
    Obama "Care"
    minimum wage
    seatbelt & helmet code
    police roadblocks
    marriage
    gambling
    gun statutes
    rent stabilization/control
    eminent domain
    paid work family leave
    blue "laws"
    happy hour legislation
    assisted suicide
    firework selling restrictions
    asset forfeiture
    campaign contribution statutes
    cable TV regulation
    raw milk selling
    trans-fat food bans
    Etc, etc, etc, etc
    All are corporate regulations, not laws, and most are by consent since they involve various corporate contracts. And most, if not all, are simply to criminalize behavior that threatens certain corporate monopolies and/or their control of industries for social engineering purposes.
    Last edited by devil21; 07-23-2017 at 12:21 AM.
    "Let it not be said that we did nothing."-Ron Paul

    "We have set them on the hobby-horse of an idea about the absorption of individuality by the symbolic unit of COLLECTIVISM. They have never yet and they never will have the sense to reflect that this hobby-horse is a manifest violation of the most important law of nature, which has established from the very creation of the world one unit unlike another and precisely for the purpose of instituting individuality."- A Quote From Some Old Book

Page 6 of 6 FirstFirst ... 456


Similar Threads

  1. Inside the mind of a SWAT cop
    By Anti Federalist in forum Individual Rights Violations: Case Studies
    Replies: 80
    Last Post: 03-10-2019, 08:58 PM
  2. Inside a liberal mind
    By libertyjam in forum U.S. Political News
    Replies: 25
    Last Post: 11-16-2014, 03:57 AM
  3. A Look inside the mind of Masonry
    By WarDog in forum U.S. Political News
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 07-19-2009, 10:02 AM
  4. Inside the Mind of a Sociopath
    By Truth Warrior in forum U.S. Political News
    Replies: 48
    Last Post: 01-27-2009, 05:52 AM
  5. inside the Neocon Mind
    By garrettwombat in forum Grassroots Central
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 01-13-2008, 10:00 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •