That is correct. Not every unjustified shooting results in a murder charge. Sometimes they result in civil penalties.
Remember when you were arguing with @
Snowball? He made a valid point
THAT YOU COULD NOT TRULY REBUT! His point was the crowd posed a danger in total, not just Ashli Babbitt herself. Your "rebuttal" was that congress had all been evacuated. But the fact that Massie and his staff were there proves that isn't true. More importantly, you have no idea whether Byrd knew the evacuation was complete. So, by your own admission, the shooting was "justifiable" if by that you mean there was some reason for that. However, I prefer the position of @
Valli6. Since there wasn't an immediate threat of death from Ashli Babbitt he shouldn't have shot her IMO.
That said, this wasn't an "execution." He wasn't acting like a "coward." The other cops, that you refuse to call out, who left their posts were the real cowards. He did his job. Not in the way I would have wanted him to do it. He should be fired, but not tried. Those people with Ashli Babbitt who were trying to break through the barricade are in part guilty of her death. I get it. You think the "insurrection" (or whatever that clown show was called) was justified. Ashli Babbitt is your Crispus Attucks. Crispus Attucks is a personal hero of mine. But I understand why John Adams defended the British redcoats that shot him and the others at the Boston Massacre. They weren't "peaceful protestors." I thank @
Anti Federalist for first posting this picture of Attucks.
I think he should be fired. That itself is a consequence. Why don't you understand that?
Connect With Us