I don't want to perpetually post bad stuff about Johnson. I completely understand people voting for him. I don't think it will do anything but reasonable people can differ.
But this guy doesn't represent my views. And I am sure people will find this interesting. http://digital.vpr.net/post/reversal...ation#stream/0
“You know, since I’ve said that … I’ve come to find out that without mandatory vaccines, the vaccines that would in fact be issued would not be effective,” he said. “So … it’s dependent that you have mandatory vaccines so that every child is immune. Otherwise, not all children will be immune even though they receive a vaccine.”
“In my opinion, this is a local issue. If it ends up to be a federal issue, I would come down on the side of science and I would probably require that vaccine,” he said.
Not exactly Ayn Rand's view. http://www.peikoff.com/2009/12/07/wh...of-quarantine/
I won't even start a new thread for this. He is for mandatory GMO labeling. The guy takes the $#@!head position everything.
https://www.isidewith.com/candidate-...nce/gmo-labels
Site Information
About Us
- RonPaulForums.com is an independent grassroots outfit not officially connected to Ron Paul but dedicated to his mission. For more information see our Mission Statement.
Connect With Us