How do you argue with idealists who resort to measuring things in terms of "social benefits."
I was arguing with a person about the inefficiency of government-run education and he kept going back to the idea that if government runs schools, more people will have access to education, therefore people will become smarter and the economy will improve with smarter people.
Another one was the idea behind workers and employers. A worker and an employer have the right to a contract, but the employer has the upper hand because there are fewer employers than workers. A worker can not bargain well because no work may cost the worker dearly in terms of needing money to survive, whereas an employer is in no position to lose his job so that the terms are in favor of the employer.
Site Information
About Us
- RonPaulForums.com is an independent grassroots outfit not officially connected to Ron Paul but dedicated to his mission. For more information see our Mission Statement.
Connect With Us