Gallup: Five Million Latin Americans Coming to U.S. in Next 12 Months

[Swordsmyth]

If it happens "all the time" you should have no troubles finding them. But I understand. You did your best.

I don't have to fetch when you command, you yourself posted the maps that show which parts of the border have barriers and which don't.

[Zippyjuan]

I don't have to fetch when you command, you yourself posted the maps that show which parts of the border have barriers and which don't.

True. You don't back up claims with facts all that often- just toss out a few cliches. "Commies!" "Hordes!" "Invasion!" I am the one who does that.

Be afwaid! Gobernment will save you!

[Swordsmyth]

True. You don't back up claims with facts all that often- just toss out a few cliches. I am the one who does that.

Be afwaid! Gobernment will save you!

LOL

[acptulsa]

Every wave of immigrants has been more socialist than the last because the rest of the world has got more socialist at a faster rate than America did.

Immigration causes socialism, but the U.S. allows more, yet becomes more socialist more slowly.

Hmmm...

[Swordsmyth]

Immigration causes socialism, but the U.S. allows more, yet becomes more socialist more slowly.

Hmmm...

LOL

Where did I say the only cause of socialism was immigration?

[invisible]

Clearly, if you allow an invading demographic, hostile your customs, traditions, institutions, values and ideals, to overwhelm and displace you, you will end up a second class citizen in that nation that was once yours.

Why would you think that protecting customs, traditions, institutions, values, and ideals is a legitimate function of government? Is that in the Constitution somewhere? Aren't people supposed to be free to decide what customs, traditions, institutions, values, and ideals they have for themselves, as individuals? Why would you attempt to argue that those things should be decided on a collective basis, isn't that a socialist argument?

[nikcers]

LOL

LOL

[Zippyjuan]

Why would you think that protecting customs, traditions, institutions, values, and ideals is a legitimate function of government? Is that in the Constitution somewhere? Aren't people supposed to be free to decide what customs, traditions, institutions, values, and ideals they have for themselves, as individuals? Why would you attempt to argue that those things should be decided on a collective basis, isn't that a socialist argument?

Government should make everybody the same. Wait- that would be communism.

[Swordsmyth]

Why would you think that protecting customs, traditions, institutions, values, and ideals is a legitimate function of government? Is that in the Constitution somewhere? Aren't people supposed to be free to decide what customs, traditions, institutions, values, and ideals they have for themselves, as individuals? Why would you attempt to argue that those things should be decided on a collective basis, isn't that a socialist argument?

Liberty is custom, a tradition, a value and an ideal.

The legitimate function of government is to protect liberty.

You argument that people must be given the freedom to violate our liberty would be funny if it wasn't so deadly serious.

[Swordsmyth]

Government should make everybody the same. Wait- that would be communism.

Government should protect everyone's rights from those who wish to violate them, that's freedom.

[Swordsmyth]

LOL

LOL

[Zippyjuan]

Liberty is custom, a tradition, a value and an ideal.

The legitimate function of government is to protect liberty.

You argument that people must be given the freedom to violate our liberty would be funny if it wasn't so deadly serious.

More cliches but,

Liberty means you are free to practice your own values, customs, and ideals. And others can practice theirs. If everybody must have the same ideals and customs, that isn't liberty.

If your values are true, somebody else cannot take them from you.

What if a government decided that you were the one with the wrong ideals and wanted you to change to join the crowd? Would you be calling that liberty?

[nikcers]

Liberty means you are free to practice your own values, customs, and ideals. If everybody must have the same ideals and customs, that isn't liberty.

If your values are true, somebody else cannot take them from you.

That's the joke.

[Swordsmyth]

Liberty means you are free to practice your own values, customs, and ideals. If everybody must have the same ideals and customs, that isn't liberty.

If your values are true, somebody else cannot take them from you.

Liberty means liberty, it doesn't mean you are free to practice tyranny.

Do you even read what you type?

[Ender]

My bad I thought you'd be flattered or just admit that you and zippy were the same
poster, just playing darts,,,,,sorry.
-
Ok so, then , mmm, lets see, you didn't call for 'open borders' .
I didn't call for 'standing armies' , ''now we have something we can agree on''
How are you going, I mean how in the hell are you going to keep out disease ridden felons, rapists, murderers,
terrorists, ms13 and drug traffickers merely by cutting all incentives (something I've called for a million times)?

Well, lessee.......

End the WoD.
End the WoT.
FREE TRADE.

And voila!

I know, I know, it all equals rocket science.

[Zippyjuan]

Liberty means liberty, it doesn't mean you are free to practice tyranny.

Do you even read what you type?

(more cliches) You want tyranny to restrict those who are different from you. That is not liberty.

[Swordsmyth]

(more cliches) You want tyranny to restrict those who are different from you. That is not liberty.

LOL

The definition of liberty is that people are prevented from engaging in tyranny and I absolutely want government to restrict people from engaging in tyranny.

Did you skip your meds today?

[Swordsmyth]

Well, lessee.......

End the WoD.
End the WoT.
FREE TRADE.

And voila!

I know, I know, it all equals rocket science.

That isn't enough, they would still come for the prosperity and vote for the socialism that would destroy it.

[Swordsmyth]

More cliches but,

Liberty means you are free to practice your own values, customs, and ideals. And others can practice theirs. If everybody must have the same ideals and customs, that isn't liberty.

If your values are true, somebody else cannot take them from you.

What if a government decided that you were the one with the wrong ideals and wanted you to change to join the crowd? Would you be calling that liberty?

Liberty is liberty, government enforcing it is a good thing, government failing to enforce it and suppressing it is a bad thing.

Morality isn't relative, I am right and my enemies are wrong, the legitimate purpose of government is to impose right against wrong on this subject.

[Stratovarious]

Well, lessee.......

End the WoD.
End the WoT.
FREE TRADE.

And voila!

I know, I know, it all equals rocket science.

Do you have a phobia of sentences, and is your world all acronyms....:facepalm:

[Stratovarious]

Well, lessee.......

End the WoD.
End the WoT.
FREE TRADE.

And voila!

I know, I know, it all equals rocket science.

How are you going to keep out disease ridden felons, rapists, murderers,
terrorists, ms13 and drug traffickers merely by cutting all incentives ?
Your gibberish is not a solution to the question.

[Zippyjuan]

Liberty is liberty, government enforcing it is a good thing, government failing to enforce it and suppressing it is a bad thing.

Morality isn't relative, I am right and my enemies are wrong, the legitimate purpose of government is to impose right against wrong on this subject.

More cliches but- "I am right and my enemies are wrong" is used to justify tyranny.

the legitimate purpose of government is to impose right against wrong on this subject

That isn't liberty. The Communists were good at that.

[nikcers]

Do you have a phobia of sentences, and is your world all acronyms....:facepalm:

Do you have a phobia of acronyms?

[Stratovarious]

Do you have a phobia of acronyms?

fo troll

[Swordsmyth]

More cliches but- "I am right and my enemies are wrong" is used to justify tyranny.



That isn't liberty. The Communists were good at that.

You are the moron trying to justify tyranny by gutting the definition of liberty.

There is and can be no such thing as the freedom to engage in tyranny.

[Swordsmyth]

How are you going to keep out disease ridden felons, rapists, murderers,
terrorists, ms13 and drug traffickers merely by cutting all incentives ?
Your gibberish is not a solution to the question.

How is he going to cut all incentives without destroying prosperity?

[johnwk]

No, that's only what those in power would like everyone to think, and the racists are only their useful idiots.

Useful idiots? Really.

A very real problem, one that does not get the attention it ought to get is, we have domestic enemies, mostly socialists and communists, who are hard at work to destroy American and the flame of freedom it represents. They have realized they cannot overpower America by force and have resorted to other tactics to destroy us, one tactic is to flood our country with the poverty stricken, poorly educated, low-skilled, disease carrying and criminal populations of other countries.


Make no mistake. There is a very real war taking place on American soil.


JWK


There is no surer way to weaken, subdue, demoralize and then conquer a prosperous and freedom loving people than by allowing and encouraging the poverty stricken, poorly educated, low-skilled, criminal and diseased populations of other countries to invade that country, and make the country’s existing citizens tax-slaves to support the economic needs of such invaders.

[Stratovarious]

How is he going to cut all incentives without destroying prosperity?

I'm not sure I follow?
You mean like turn the country into sht to stop attracting an influx of illegals
and ruin the country?
Could you elaborate.....

[nikcers]

You are the moron trying to justify tyranny by gutting the definition of liberty.

There is and can be no such thing as the freedom to engage in tyranny.

If you can't rape the willing than it's not rape if they are consenting to big government...

[Zippyjuan]

You are the moron trying to justify tyranny by gutting the definition of liberty.

There is and can be no such thing as the freedom to engage in tyranny.

You need a new playbook with more accurate definitions (assuming that being factual is actually a goal for you).

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/liberty

Definition of liberty (Entry 1 of 2)
1 : the quality or state of being free:
a : the power to do as one pleases
b : freedom from physical restraint
c : freedom from arbitrary or despotic (see DESPOT sense 1) control
d : the positive enjoyment of various social, political, or economic rights and privileges
e : the power of choice