The Official Alt Right Thread

[RestorationOfLiberty]

Which is why all people of Northern and Eastern European descent are also socialist by origin statist Democrats who must be deported. They can't help but promote their culture.

Right?

Not all, just the leftists.

[citation needed]

http://science.jrank.org/pages/9960/...-Theology.html

And they are Catholic which is statism.

Similar to the sub-90 IQs of first-generation Italian, Spanish, and Portuguese immigrants in early 20th century studies. We're running out of Americans who can understand liberty pretty fast here. (You know who had average IQs above 100 in those same studies? Those dirty Northern European socialists. Also Asian socialists. Not Eastern European socialists though, they're both dumb and of an incompatible culture!)

Their IQS were not sub IQ.

We did not have a welfare state

We had Freedom of Association so you did not have to deal with them

But hey keep comparing then and now like their is any over lay besides the lack of freedoms.

You're confusing me here. What country do you live in? The America I live in is and has been a one party state for decades, and that party is a statist party.

America, I mean state as in states.

And do you think adding more welfare voters will make anything better how again?

[RestorationOfLiberty]

As much as I disagree with what I perceive the alt-right's positions to be they are much preferable to what we have now. So, good luck.

What do you disagree with?

Are are the positions you perceive we have?

Feel free to ask, the worst thing I do is give an honest answer.

Are you claiming authority to speak on their behalf?

And..............Twasn't I who brought up deporting sub-90 IQ people was it?

Trying to tell me what I understand or don't doesn't make you appear wise or intelligent...

Do you claim authority to speak in general?

Where did I bring up deporting Americans who have a sub 90 IQ? I just do not want to bring in any low IQed persons.

Nor does it make you.

[tod evans]

And will gut most of the government as it does not serve

This idea (although poorly expressed) is both good and noble..

In fact it's one of the cornerstones of the Ron Paul campaigns..

If you haven't given any thought as to how to go about implementing said "gutting" the good Dr. has spelled it out countless times in great detail, he's even put his thoughts in video format for the intellectually inept.

You might do yourself some good either reading his works or staring at a monitor while trying to comprehend his thoughts...

[RestorationOfLiberty]

This idea (although poorly expressed) is both good and noble..

In fact it's one of the cornerstones of the Ron Paul campaigns..

If you haven't given any thought as to how to go about implementing said "gutting" the good Dr. has spelled it out countless times in great detail, he's even put his thoughts in video format for the intellectually inept.

You might do yourself some good either reading his works or staring at a monitor while trying to comprehend his thoughts...

Ron Paul is a hero to our movement, we just building on the Foundation he laid out.

One of the methods is very logical, stop importing people who support leftist/welfare statism. Doing so only increases the ranks of the lefts.

[P3ter_Griffin]

What do you disagree with?

Are are the positions you perceive we have?

Feel free to ask, the worst thing I do is give an honest answer.

Well as an anarchist I will disagree in any positions where coercion is used, whether that is taxation used to sustain what is deemed as necessary government functions or national borders with immigration restrictions rather than strict property rights observance or trade protectionism purported to support the American worker. Most specifically, I disagree with the tactics I generally see being espoused set to deal with the welfare state and problems that the welfare state bring, that essentially a police state should be formed to combat the effects of the welfare state rather than just ending the welfare state. That's why I mentioned Brexit, because if such a group had an independent nation they could better control whether or not it was a welfare state, and then possibly some of the more disagreeable parts would fade away. Regardless, as I said, I'd rather contribute to a nation that are 'border nazis' and protectionist than a nation ran by imperialists.

[RestorationOfLiberty]

Well as an anarchist I will disagree in any positions where coercion is used, whether that is taxation used to sustain what is deemed as necessary government functions or national borders with immigration restrictions rather than strict property rights observance or trade protectionism purported to support the American worker. Most specifically, I disagree with the tactics I generally see being espoused set to deal with the welfare state and problems that the welfare state bring, that essentially a police state should be formed to combat the effects of the welfare state rather than just ending the welfare state. That's why I mentioned Brexit, because if such a group had an independent nation they could better control whether or not it was a welfare state, and then possibly some of the more disagreeable parts would fade away. Regardless, as I said, I'd rather contribute to a nation that are 'border nazis' and protectionist than a nation ran by imperialists.

How is border defense not defense of property all be it on a larger scale?

Protectionism does work, I mean you can disagree with it but the facts clearly back this up.

More ore less that is what we are, we are more "Isolationist" then anything. But their is support for liberating South Africa or at least funding groups to bring about a 2 party state situation.

[tod evans]

Ron Paul is a hero to our movement, we just building on the Foundation he laid out.

One of the methods is very logical, stop importing people who support leftist/welfare statism. Doing so only increases the ranks of the lefts.

This has absolutely nothing to do with "gutting" government and is only a distraction...

You claim to want to tear down the house (government) in one sentence and then in the next sentence you want to attack the cockroach eating crumbs in the corner (immigrants)...

[RestorationOfLiberty]

This has absolutely nothing to do with "gutting" government and is only a distraction...

You claim to want to tear down the house (government) in one sentence and then in the next sentence you want to attack the cockroach eating crumbs in the corner (immigrants)...

We are cutting of welfare cases, criminals, sick people, etc, in short the clients and supporters of the welfare state as well as people who will vote for it if given the means to do so.

If we do not stem the influx of voters soon we will be unable to enact any of our goals via the ballot box as the we will have been replaced and out voted, leaving us only one choice left and we all know how that will work out. Yes will win but the body count could be epic.

For that reason alone immigration reduction is one of our main goals as without ending the flow all other things will not be possible.

Think of immigration in this context. If we did not have the 1965 immigration act and did not have any immigration from the Arab World as we did with the 1924 Immigration Act do you think we would have let in the 9/11 Hijackers? Of course not.

If we did not let them in do you think 9/11 would have happened?

If 9/11 did not happen do you think we would have the current spy/police state, the massive loss of freedom, and the massive tax burden that we have the honor of paying?

See how the long term effect of talking in large numbers of non compatible people results in such deminishment of our rights, wealth and future?

In this context we Americans are the home owners and we are being asphyxiated on the gases (regulations, taxes, loss of freedoms) of the exterminator (the state) is using to get rid of the cockroaches (illegals, legals, refugees, ect) that they imported to justify their use of the gas in the first place.

[tod evans]

We are cutting of welfare cases, criminals, sick people, etc, in short the clients and supporters of the welfare state as well as people who will vote for it if given the means to do so.

If we do not stem the influx of voters soon we will be unable to enact any of our goals via the ballot box as the we will have been replaced and out voted, leaving us only one choice left and we all know how that will work out. Yes will win but the body count could be epic.

For that reason alone immigration reduction is one of our main goals as without ending the flow all other things will not be possible.

Think of immigration in this context. If we did not have the 1965 immigration act and did not have any immigration from the Arab World as we did with the 1924 Immigration Act do you think we would have let in the 9/11 Hijackers? Of course not.

If we did not let them in do you think 9/11 would have happened?

If 9/11 did not happen do you think we would have the current spy/police state, the massive loss of freedom, and the massive tax burden that we have the honor of paying?

See how the long term effect of talking in large numbers of non compatible people results in such deminishment of our rights, wealth and future?

In this context we Americans are the home owners and we are being asphyxiated on the gases (regulations, taxes, loss of freedoms) of the exterminator (the state) is using to get rid of the cockroaches (illegals, legals, refugees, ect) that they imported to justify their use of the gas in the first place.

That's a whole lotta words to say you want big government to continue, you just want big government to do your bidding.

Here's a concept for you to mull over.........

Without big government there would be no free $#@!.

Without big government you would retain what wealth you earn.

Without big government you would be responsible for securing your rights and freedom.

[RestorationOfLiberty]

That's a whole lotta words to say you want big government to continue, you just want big government to do your bidding.

Here's a concept for you to mull over.........

Without big government there would be no free $#@!.

Without big government you would retain what wealth you earn.

Without big government you would be responsible for securing your rights and freedom.

No, I just want government to due its job, secure the border and keep out threats.

How do you end big government when you are allow in millions of it supporters and people who will vote for it if leftist give them ciztenship creating an unbeatable majority?

Riddle me that one batman.

[cajuncocoa]

//

[tod evans]

No, I just want government to due its job, secure the border and keep out threats.

How do you end big government when you are allow in millions of it supporters and people who will vote for it if leftist give them ciztenship creating an unbeatable majority?

Riddle me that one batman.

Obviously you have mistaken me for someone else...

Big government always fails, question is how will this one fail....

Your idea of government "doing its job" and someone else might differ drastically and what all of us are dealing with today is a government that is doing the jobs countless others like yourself have asked of it....

I want a government that does little to nothing, only the barest of necessities, and only then with the unanimous approval of the citizenry....

[cajuncocoa]

//

[TheCount]

http://science.jrank.org/pages/9960/...-Theology.html

And they are Catholic which is statism.

You're going to have to point out for me which part supports your theory that Hispanics are culturally incapable of understanding things. This is completely unrelated.

Their IQS were not sub IQ.

Yes, an IQ of 84 (for Italians) is by definition a "sub IQ" as you put it, as the numbers are normalized such that 100 is the average.

We did not have a welfare state

I thought that the problem was that they were too stupid to understand things, not welfare.

We had Freedom of Association so you did not have to deal with them

Now the problem is freedom of association?

Also, who is we? Were you alive in the 1920s?

But hey keep comparing then and now like their is any over lay besides the lack of freedoms.

The word is overlap, and there is quite a lot. Various people similar in nature to you have been screeching about the substandard quality of the latest batch of immigrants since before this country was founded.

America, I mean state as in states.

You're not making any sense.

And do you think adding more welfare voters will make anything better how again?

Voters? I thought that we were talking about immigrants.

[FunkBuddha]

Better watch those eugenicists don't come for ya.

Isn't that the next logical step for the alt-right though? If you deport immigrants on the basis of the bulk of them having a sub-90 IQ on the basis that they're breeding and polluting the gene pool, isn't the next logical step to sterilize everyone left with sub-90 IQs? One can't help but draw parallels between the alt-right and the progressive left of the early 20th century.

[tod evans]

Isn't that the next logical step for the alt-right though? If you deport immigrants on the basis of the bulk of them having a sub-90 IQ on the basis that they're breeding and polluting the gene pool, isn't the next logical step to sterilize everyone left with sub-90 IQs? One can't help but draw parallels between the alt-right and the progressive left of the early 20th century.

There sure seems to be a lot of "immigrant" Dr.'s, healthcare workers and IT people who would probably score higher on the IQ scale than the joker complaining about them....

[cajuncocoa]

//

[cajuncocoa]

//

[cajuncocoa]

We had Freedom of Association so you did not have to deal with them

I remember having a lot of fun doing this to AmericanSpartan over the many times he was fixated on this (not that it's not a worthy thing, I just liked driving AS nuts!!) Besides, I like this band.

[cajuncocoa]

//

[pcosmar]

Ron Paul is a hero to our movement, we just building on the Foundation he laid out.

.

nope,, just trying that to hitch your wagon.

Ron is a man of Principle. And you lack that.

[RestorationOfLiberty]

Isn't that the next logical step for the alt-right though? If you deport immigrants on the basis of the bulk of them having a sub-90 IQ on the basis that they're breeding and polluting the gene pool, isn't the next logical step to sterilize everyone left with sub-90 IQs? One can't help but draw parallels between the alt-right and the progressive left of the early 20th century.

We are deporting them for being a burden, mostly due to their lack of ability to function in a high IQ society.

The classic "you are nazis" and "slippery slope fallacy" really do show you do not have a point.

You're going to have to point out for me which part supports your theory that Hispanics are culturally incapable of understanding things. This is completely unrelated.

Why is it hard to believe the idea that some values/ideals/concepts may not translate to people who have not been raised inside the nation of based Anglo Saxon Protestant ideas? Hell even those who are some times fail to understand/accept.

Yes, an IQ of 84 (for Italians) is by definition a "sub IQ" as you put it, as the numbers are normalized such that 100 is the average.

Link?

I thought that the problem was that they were too stupid to understand things, not welfare.

Low IQed people use welfare and gov assistants at a rate higher then higher IQed people.

Now the problem is freedom of association?

Holy Hell you are dumb, I am say we had that right now we no longer do. Do not believe? Refuse to rent to some groups and see what happens.

Also, who is we? Were you alive in the 1920s?

No, I was not but I bet I would have partied when the 1924 act passed.

The word is overlap, and there is quite a lot. Various people similar in nature to you have been screeching about the substandard quality of the latest batch of immigrants since before this country was founded.

And let me guess, not a single person had or has any valid concerns or facts supporting them, right? Every single one is just a bigot with lies, right?

So anyone who does not to bring in welfare cases, sick, burdensome people, or groups that commit higher rates of crime, or horrid acts of terrorism are just "narrow minded"?


You're not making any sense.

Compare:



They're either one and the same, or the eugenicists of the alt-right scored 2 sub 100 IQ victims for their camp all at once.

Wow using the same words in the same language makes what point again?

Do you even have a point to make?

More over their is nothing wrong with passive eugenics.

nope,, just trying that to hitch your wagon.

Ron is a man of Principle. And you lack that.

Really? Do tell how I "lack principle". Is it because I refuse to believe lies or is it because we just better views.

[cajuncocoa]

//

[pcosmar]

Really? Do tell how I "lack principle". Is it because I refuse to believe lies or is it because we just better views.

It's the Elitist garbage.

You seem to have some massive superiority complex.

and a red square that you seem intent on earning

[RestorationOfLiberty]

I think you'll soon learn, they aren't talking about "passive" eugenics. Keep making these grammatical errors though. I guess we'll know where you are when you disappear.


P.S. everyone with an IQ higher than their shoe size gets my point.

Not allowing in hordes of low IQed people, not allowing in hordes of leftist voters, not wanting to reward people for mindless breeding, that is passive and you can not find a single flaw in it.

[RestorationOfLiberty]

It's the Elitist garbage.

You seem to have some massive superiority complex.

and a red square that you seem intent on earning

O.K so what is wrong with keeping people out of the nation who will vote again your rights, vote to strip you of your wealth, who lower wages, who increase the cost of living, who commit crimes, who support or commit acts of terrorism?

Ever notice those who can not make a point use personal insults?

[cajuncocoa]

//

[pcosmar]

O.K so what is wrong with keeping people out of the nation who will vote again your rights, vote to strip you of your wealth, who lower wages, who increase the cost of living, who commit crimes, who support or commit acts of terrorism?

IDK,, What is wrong with the people born and raised here who did this to the country? ???

Your description above is of most Americans..

and they were at it long before I was born.

If you think the spoiled,,egotistical showman son of a slum lord is gonna change things,, you are sadly mistaken.

[RestorationOfLiberty]

But....you're already here.


Psssst......"IQed" isn't a word.

Stefan Molyneux uses it.

so in classic leftist action you can not make a point, stand up to the facts in hand, and have to act like a kid. Please do go on and show us what you are.

[FunkBuddha]

We are deporting them for being a burden, mostly due to their lack of ability to function in a high IQ society.

The classic "you are nazis" and "slippery slope fallacy" really do show you do not have a point.

Who said anything about Nazis?

Your usage of a straw man to accuse me of a logical fallacy shows me that lack you lack the reasoning skills to comprehend my point.

By the way, your rhetorical skills are as good as your English.