Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 61 to 90 of 92

Thread: Dirty Vaccines: Every Human Vaccine Tested Was Contaminated With Metals and Debris in New Stud

  1. #61
    Quote Originally Posted by donnay View Post
    Which means we are inundated with formaldehyde all around us, where we are being embalmed before we are dead. So lets continue to add more of the carcinogenic compound in vaccines, what could it hurt?
    So why aren't we all dead? Formaldehyde is needed to produce protein and DNA in your body. Get rid of it and you may die too. Your body is able to break down what it does not need (unless you get a massive dose in one shot like drinking it). As I have said many times, dose matters. Some things are important to us in small amounts while in huge amounts can be deadly. Even drinking too much water can kill you yet don't get enough and you can die too. You would need thousands if not millions of vaccines to get enough formaldehyde for it to be toxic to you because the amount is so small.
    Last edited by Zippyjuan; 02-22-2017 at 01:52 PM.



  2. Remove this section of ads by registering.
  3. #62
    Quote Originally Posted by Zippyjuan View Post
    the chemical also occurs widely in nature, and it is even produced inside the human body as a natural part of the digestive process.
    Exactly. This has nothing to do with chemically produced formaldehyde that is injected into babies via vaccines. It is a known toxic, listed so by the CDC, and I am not aware of any studies showing the effects of injecting it into humans. Continuing to compare naturally occurring formaldehyde in the food system with chemically produced formaldehyde injected into humans proves absolutely nothing. But then logic is not your strong suit....

    Just for the record Zip, still waiting for answers to these questions from you regarding vaccines that I have asked in previous threads:

    So answer this question: Do you believe the "science is settled" on vaccines, and that ALL children should be vaccinated with ALL vaccines, by force if necessary?
    Do you believe nurses and other healthcare workers should be mandated to take the flu shot as a condition for employment?
    Do you believe as a matter of routine premies should get ALL the required CDC vaccinations at birth and two months (where normally they would not have been born yet) as do full-term babies?
    There is no fear in love, but perfect love casts out fear. For fear has to do with punishment, and whoever fears has not been perfected in love.
    (1 John 4:18)

  4. #63
    Quote Originally Posted by Created4 View Post
    Exactly. This has nothing to do with chemically produced formaldehyde that is injected into babies via vaccines. It is a known toxic, listed so by the CDC, and I am not aware of any studies showing the effects of injecting it into humans. Continuing to compare naturally occurring formaldehyde in the food system with chemically produced formaldehyde injected into humans proves absolutely nothing. But then logic is not your strong suit....

    :
    Actually it is the exact same thing. And I have answered your questions before. Search for them if you want to read it again.

  5. #64
    Quote Originally Posted by Zippyjuan View Post
    So why aren't we all dead? Formaldehyde is needed to produce protein and DNA in your body. Get rid of it and you may die too. Your body is able to break down what it does not need (unless you get a massive dose in one shot like drinking it). As I have said many times, dose matters. Some things are important to us in small amounts while in huge amounts can be deadly. Even drinking too much water can kill you yet don't get enough and you can die too. You would need thousands if not millions of vaccines to get enough formaldehyde for it to be toxic to you because the amount is so small.

    There is a reason why formaldehyde preserves tissues. Remember that formaldehyde's unstable carbon "wants" to be stabilized by something negative? In biological tissues, the negative thing it will most likely to encounter is something called an amine. An amine is just a particular pattern of atoms commonly found around a nitrogen atom, and you can depend on that nitrogen to have negatively charged particles called electrons hanging out on it because that is always part of how an amine's structure is defined. Amines are abundant in living things, as you can reliably find them in proteins and DNA.



    So, formaldehyde reacts with both proteins and DNA. More precisely, formaldehyde's carbon yanks on the amine's electrons and turns them into a strong bond, which helps carbon have a charge closer to zero. The remnants of the formaldehyde molecule remains unstable, so continues to self-destruct and eventually welds itself onto a second nearby amine. This bonding is the real problem.



    Formaldehyde ties together proteins to other proteins, and occasionally to DNA too. This action is termed crosslinking. Crosslinking renders the fraction of vulnerable proteins and DNA that the formaldehyde was in direct physical contact with permanently dysfunctional or useless. If you were a protein, imagine you get some gigantic object permanently stuck to your hand. That would make you less able to perform your regular activities too, right?



    Not only does this crosslinking stiffen and toughen the tissue and make it less likely to break down, it also makes too tough for bacteria that would like to eat it and decompose it, and formaldehyde tends to kill those bacteria, anyway, because it does the same thing to their proteins. That's why formaldehyde preserves tissues—nothing left alive can eat much of what is left of the tissues. The residual sugars, water, and small molecules remain encased in a gooey matrix of toughened, crosslinked proteins.



    This crosslinking is all fine and good for tissue that's already dead, but what about having this activity going on in our own living tissue? Dysfunctional and useless proteins and DNA in our bodies? Should we panic about that? It depends.



    Now, it isn't necessarily the end of the world if some of your protein or even your DNA is mechanically abused this way—it happens every day in the wear and tear of normal aging and we have evolved wonderful enzymes that zip around, repairing or breaking down and recycling our damaged molecules. (Yes, cells recycle. How about that! I am always reminding my students that cells have survived on earth for billions of years, so if we have any smarts we should copy this obviously brilliant energy strategy. Even our grandparents knew how to re-use things. But I digress...) So, our bodies can repair molecular damage to some extent. However, not all DNA damage is the same--some is harder to repair. Crosslinking is hard to repair.



    Adducts Cause Cancer

    This cross-linking form of damage involves the formation type of bond (called covalent) that is especially tough to break. The unwelcome addition to our newly appendaged molecule is called an adduct (pronounced ADD-uct). Literally an adduct gets stuck to valuable molecules and it won't come off, so those molecules malfunction. (Well, to be technically correct, the formaldehyde reaction is considered reversible and you could break the adduct off if you want to heat it to 203 F (95 C). But because it is insane to burn yourself this is not a practical consideration unless you are talking about doing that reversal in a test tube.)



    My pulse quickens when I read about molecules forming adducts to DNA because that is usually bad news and the first thing I think is, "oh, oh, that could be carcinogenic". Adduct-forming molecules often are. (In researching the herb valerian for my book Herbs Demystified, for example, I was concerned to learn that this plant contained a molecule with an unstable bond called an epoxide. Epoxides form adducts and some are carcinogenic. However, there does not appear to be an association of valerian consumers with cancer that is statistically obvious, perhaps because valerian's epoxides may degrade too quickly to cause harm.)



    Examples of known carcinogen molecules that form adducts are found in tobacco smoke, burned meat (polyaromatic hydrocarbons and nitrosamines), fungal toxins (aflatoxin), certain pesticides (lindane) and even (weakly) estrogen. Even some simple elements form adducts, too, like mercury, lead, and arsenic. Some are more effective at forming adducts than others, and although our body can repair some adduct damage, obviously less exposure to adduct-formers is a good idea. The more you expose yourself, the more you roll the dice to get a cancerous cell. Why does this cause cancer, though?



    Typically one or two permanently damaged DNA molecules doesn't cause cancer, but the more you damage, the greater the risk of cancer. DNA provides instructions for making a protein, so if you mess up these instructions you get eventually get a dysfunctional protein. What happens is that eventually you get a protein that malfunctions in that it fails to turn cell division off (the cell's brake gets stuck in the off position), or it malfunctions in that it continuously turns cell division on (the cell's accelerator gets stuck in the on position.) Either way, you get a continuously dividing cell, which turns into a mass of dividing cells called a tumor. And guess what! Formaldehyde is officially considered carcinogenic. It is most associated with "blood cancers", that is, cancers of white blood cells like leukemia. Lots of unhappy lab animals have proved that. People who work with formaldehyde in industry are statistically more likely to get leukemia, too.



    If you just expose your skin to it or breathe it in (remember, it's really a gas) it will do some limited crosslinking of proteins in your skin and respiratory tract. So it's not surprising that it is well known to cause contact dermatitis, rashes, and irritation. Since this attracts the attention of your immune defense system, it is common to develop an allergy to it.
    http://drholly.typepad.com/question_...011/06/th.html
    “The spirits of darkness are now among us. We have to be on guard so that we may realize what is happening when we encounter them and gain a real idea of where they are to be found. The most dangerous thing you can do in the immediate future will be to give yourself up unconsciously to the influences which are definitely present.” ~ Rudolf Steiner



  6. Remove this section of ads by registering.
  7. #65
    Quote Originally Posted by Zippyjuan View Post
    Actually it is the exact same thing.
    Saying so doesn't make it so. Show us the studies that formaldehyde injected into human muscle tissue has the same effect as natural formaldehyde ingested in food.


    Quote Originally Posted by Zippyjuan View Post
    And I have answered your questions before. Search for them if you want to read it again.
    Can't search for something that doesn't exist.
    There is no fear in love, but perfect love casts out fear. For fear has to do with punishment, and whoever fears has not been perfected in love.
    (1 John 4:18)

  8. #66
    Quote Originally Posted by Created4 View Post
    Saying so doesn't make it so. Show us the studies that formaldehyde injected into human muscle tissue has the same effect as natural formaldehyde ingested in food.




    Can't search for something that doesn't exist.
    Show me where it says anywhere that they are not the same. You made the claim. Show studies indicating that the amounts of formaldehyde in vaccines is enough to be harmful. Thank you for looking for them.

    Can't search for something that doesn't exist

  9. #67
    Quote Originally Posted by Zippyjuan View Post
    Show me where it says anywhere that they are not the same. You made the claim. Show studies indicating that the amounts of formaldehyde in vaccines is enough to be harmful. Thank you for looking for them.
    No, I never made the claim they are the same. You did. The fact that formaldehyde is a toxin is not disputed. Injecting the synthetic version into human muscle tissue is not a natural event, but a recent man-made medical procedure, and a procedure that is becoming more and more mandatory. Are there studies proving its safety? If so, please provide them.

    Just for the record Zip, still waiting for answers to these questions from you regarding vaccines that I have asked in previous threads:

    So answer this question: Do you believe the "science is settled" on vaccines, and that ALL children should be vaccinated with ALL vaccines, by force if necessary?
    Do you believe nurses and other healthcare workers should be mandated to take the flu shot as a condition for employment?
    Do you believe as a matter of routine premies should get ALL the required CDC vaccinations at birth and two months (where normally they would not have been born yet) as do full-term babies?
    There is no fear in love, but perfect love casts out fear. For fear has to do with punishment, and whoever fears has not been perfected in love.
    (1 John 4:18)

  10. #68
    ‘Chemophobia’ is irrational, harmful – and hard to break

    We all feel a profound connection with the natural world. E O Wilson called this sensation biophilia: ‘the urge to affiliate with other forms of life’. That sense of connection brings great emotional satisfaction. It can decrease levels of anger, anxiety and pain. It has undoubtedly helped our species to survive, since we are fundamentally dependent on our surrounding environment and ecosystem. But lately biophilia has spawned an extreme variant: chemophobia, a reflexive rejection of modern synthetic chemicals.

    Chemophobia is an outgrowth of the modern environmental movement, especially Rachel Carson’s book Silent Spring (1962), which demonised chemicals as ‘the sinister and little-recognised partners of radiation… entering into living organisms passing from one to another in a chain of poisoning and death’. Carson’s words helped to inspire unleaded gasoline, the US Clean Air Act, the banning of DDT, and other hugely important environmental advances. However, even as much of the world became cleaner, the anti-chemical movement became so polarised that all artificial chemicals are now considered tainted. This false assumption has led to a popular demand for products that are ‘natural’ or even ‘chemical-free’.

    In reality, ‘natural’ products are usually more chemically complicated than anything we can create in the lab. To demonstrate, I broke down the components in an ordinary banana. (For brevity’s sake, I omitted the thousands of minority ingredients, including DNA.) Here is the result:

    INGREDIENTS:

    WATER (75%), SUGARS (12%) (GLUCOSE (48%), FRUCTOSE (40%), SUCROSE (2%), MALTOSE (<1%)), STARCH (5%), FIBRE E460 (3%), AMINO ACIDS (<1%) (GLUTAMIC ACID (19%), ASPARTIC ACID (16%), HISTIDINE (11%), LEUCINE (7%), LYSINE (5%), PHENYLALANINE (4%), ARGININE (4%), VALINE (4%), ALANINE (4%), SERINE (4%), GLYCINE (3%), THREONINE (3%), ISOLEUCINE (3%), PROLINE (3%), TRYPTOPHAN (1%), CYSTINE (1%), TYROSINE (1%), METHIONINE (1%)), FATTY ACIDS (1%) (PALMITIC ACID (30%), OMEGA-6 FATTY ACID: LINOLEIC ACID (14%), OMEGA-3 FATTY ACID: LINOLENIC ACID (8%), OLEIC ACID (7%), PALMITOLEIC ACID (3%), STEARIC ACID (2%), LAURIC ACID (1%), MYRISTIC ACID (1%), CAPRIC ACID (<1%)), ASH (<1%), PHYTOSTEROLS, E515, OXALIC ACID, E300, E306 (TOCOPHEROL), PHYLLOQUINONE, THIAMIN, COLOURS (YELLOW-ORANGE E101 (RIBOFLAVIN), YELLOW-BROWN E160a), FLAVOURS (3-METHYLBUT-1-YL ETHANOATE, 2-METHYLBUTYL ETHANOATE, 2-METHYLPROPAN-1-OL, 3-METHYLBUTYL-1-OL, 2-HYDROXY-3-METHYLETHYL BUTANOATE, 3-METHYLBUTANAL, ETHYL HEXANOATE, ETHYL BUTANOATE, PENTYL ACETATE), 1510, NATURAL RIPENING AGENT (ETHENE GAS).

    This exercise illustrates a larger point. The distinction between natural and synthetic chemicals is not merely ambiguous, it is non-existent. The fact that an ingredient is synthetic does not automatically make it dangerous, and the fact that it is natural doesn’t make it safe. Botulinum, produced by bacteria that grow in honey, is more than 1.3 billion times as toxic as lead and is the reason why infants should never eat honey. A cup of apple seeds contains enough natural cyanide to kill an adult human. Natural chemicals can be beneficial, neutral or harmful depending on the dosage and on how they are used, just like synthetic chemicals. Whether a chemical is ‘natural’ should never be a factor when assessing its safety.


    Misconceptions about natural versus synthetic compounds can have devastating consequences. The anxiety over formaldehyde is a telling example. Formaldehyde occurs naturally in fruits, vegetables, meat, eggs and foliage. It is found in high concentrations in Peking duck (120 parts per million), smoked salmon (50 ppm), and processed meats (20 ppm) as a normal result of traditional curing processes. It is found at levels of around 2 ppm in a healthy human body, where it plays an important role in the production of DNA. Formaldehyde is also used in various industries as a preservative.

    People automatically accept the many ‘natural’ sources of formaldehyde that are present all around, but minuscule traces of ‘artificial’ formaldehyde in vaccines and cosmetics have caused public outcry – even though all formaldehyde is chemically exactly the same: CH2O. One such incident in 2013 forced Johnson & Johnson to spend more than $10 million reformulating its skincare range. They did so even though the amount of formaldehyde present was so low that the average person would need to take 40 million baths per day before it posed any serious threat.

    Vaccines also contain tiny amounts of formaldehyde. Concern about ‘artificial’ formaldehyde is one reason some people avoid vaccinations, even though the level of formaldehyde found in a vaccine (100 µg) is 80 times less than in a single pear (12,000 µg). The level is so low that a vaccine does not even measurably change the concentration of (‘natural’!) of formaldehyde in a child’s blood. Unlike the harmless trace quantities of formaldehyde, however, the avoidance of vaccination has caused many preventable deaths, including localised measles outbreaks in California, Germany and Wales in recent years.

    Fighting back against fear is difficult but not impossible. The scientific community describes chemophobia as a ‘non-clinical prejudice’ like homophobia or xenophobia – that is, not a medical phobia but a learned aversion. That insight suggests a few promising strategies.

    A lot of the solution begins in schools. High-school and college chemistry teachers need to counteract the notion that laboratories are dirty places where contaminated things are created. As one student responded to me: ‘If I can’t eat in a lab due to fear of contamination, how could food made in a lab possibly be safe to eat?’ We cannot tone down the safety messages in chemistry classes – they’re essential, and a legal requirement of my job – but we can clarify them. Teachers should talk about industrial quality control and purification techniques to communicate the extremely high standards of purity required before chemical products can be certified safe for human consumption.

    Educating consumers that ‘natural’ products are not always safe will encourage smarter healthcare choices. Tighter regulation of marketing terms is also important. The global market for ‘natural’ and ‘organic’ personal care products is projected to reach $16 billion by 2020, even though those products generally have no demonstrated safety advantage over their ‘synthetic’ equivalents. ‘Pure’ should refer to single-ingredient products only. ‘Natural’ products should be sold exactly as they occur in nature, and ‘natural’ should be forbidden as a marketing term for cosmetics and other products. Finally, the use of ‘chemical-free’ – a logical impossibility – on product labels needs to be stopped.

    The roots of chemophobia run deep. We are irrationally hard-wired to overestimate the magnitude of risks that are imposed upon us. Americans are 35,000 times as likely to die from heart disease as from terrorism, yet terrorism tops people’s list of worries. It’s only through a better knowledge of chemistry and toxicology that we can begin to assess chemical risks in a more rational, healthier way. Then perhaps we can bend chemophobia back toward biophilia – creating an awareness that humans are chemically connected to all of the world around us.
    https://aeon.co/ideas/chemophobia-is...-hard-to-break
    “I don’t think that there will be any curtailing of Donald Trump as president,” he said. "He controls the media, he controls the sentiment [and] he controls everybody. He’s the one who will resort to executive orders more so than [President] Obama ever used them." - Ron Paul

  11. #69
    Formaldehyde
    https://ntp.niehs.nih.gov/ntp/roc/co...rmaldehyde.pdf

    Formaldehyde Can Cause Cancers, Including Leukemia, National Academies Concludes
    https://www.bna.com/formaldehyde-cau...-n17179893575/

    Formaldehyde: A Poison and Carcinogen
    http://www.thevaccinereaction.org/20...nd-carcinogen/
    “The spirits of darkness are now among us. We have to be on guard so that we may realize what is happening when we encounter them and gain a real idea of where they are to be found. The most dangerous thing you can do in the immediate future will be to give yourself up unconsciously to the influences which are definitely present.” ~ Rudolf Steiner

  12. #70
    Quote Originally Posted by donnay View Post
    Formaldehyde
    https://ntp.niehs.nih.gov/ntp/roc/co...rmaldehyde.pdf

    Formaldehyde Can Cause Cancers, Including Leukemia, National Academies Concludes
    https://www.bna.com/formaldehyde-cau...-n17179893575/

    Formaldehyde: A Poison and Carcinogen
    http://www.thevaccinereaction.org/20...nd-carcinogen/
    As those note, those cancer and toxic findings were at extremely high levels of exposure over long periods of time (and most were from breathing in those large quantities)

  13. #71
    10. Formalin in whatever way introduced into the body is absorbed, and is then capable of producing lesions in the parenchymatous organs. 11. Changes in the liver after absorption of formalin consist of mild or severe grade of cloudy swelling accompanied by vacuolation of the protoplasm, changes in the nuclei and leucocytic infiltration. Focal necrosis may result. Similar changes follow the inhalation of formaldehyde. 12. The injection of formalin or the inhalation of the vapors of formaldehyde produces cloudy swelling of the parenchyma of the kidney. Focal necrosis may result. 13. Pneumonia and bronchitis are found in all animals after the injection of formalin.
    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2124506/
    “The spirits of darkness are now among us. We have to be on guard so that we may realize what is happening when we encounter them and gain a real idea of where they are to be found. The most dangerous thing you can do in the immediate future will be to give yourself up unconsciously to the influences which are definitely present.” ~ Rudolf Steiner

  14. #72
    Quote Originally Posted by donnay View Post
    Dirty Vaccines: Every Human Vaccine Tested Was Contaminated With Metals and Debris in New Study

    Thursday, February 2nd 2017 at 1:15 am
    Written By: Celeste McGovern



    Researchers examining 44 samples of 30 different vaccines found dangerous contaminants, including red blood cells in one vaccine and metal toxicants in every single sample tested – except in one animal vaccine.

    Using extremely sensitive new technologies not used in vaccine manufacturing, Italian scientists reported they were “baffled” by their discoveries which included single particles and aggregates of organic debris including red cells of human or possibly animal origin and metals including lead, tungsten, gold, and chromium, that have been linked to autoimmune disease and leukemia.

    In the study, published this week in the International Journal of Vaccines and Vaccination, the researchers led by Antoinetta Gatti, of the National Council of Research of Italy and the Scientific Director of Nanodiagnostics, say their results “show the presence of micro- and nano-sized particulate matter composed of inorganic elements in vaccine samples” not declared in the products’ ingredients lists.

    Lead particles were found in the cervical cancer vaccines, Gardasil and Cevarix, for example, and in the seasonal flu vaccine Aggripal manufactured by Novartis as well as in the Meningetec vaccine meant to protect against meningitis C.

    Samples of an infant vaccine called Infarix Hexa (against diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis, hepatitis B, poliomyelitis and haemophilus influenzae type B) manufactured by GlaxoSmithKline was found to contain stainless steel, tungsten and a gold-zinc aggregate.

    Other metal contaminants included platinum, silver, bismuth, iron, and chromium. Chromium (alone or in alloy with iron and nickel) was identified in 25 of the human vaccines from Italy and France that were tested.

    GSK’s Fluarix vaccine for children three years and older contained 11 metals and aggregates of metals. Similar aggregates to those identified in the vaccines have been shown to be prevalent in cases of leukemia, the researchers noted.

    Read more: http://www.greenmedinfo.com/blog/dir...nd-debris-new-

    Were these vaccines used only in Italy or globally?



  15. Remove this section of ads by registering.
  16. #73
    Quote Originally Posted by TommyJeff View Post
    Were these vaccines used only in Italy or globally?
    In this particular study: "Other metal contaminants included platinum, silver, bismuth, iron, and chromium. Chromium (alone or in alloy with iron and nickel) was identified in 25 of the human vaccines from Italy and France that were tested."
    “The spirits of darkness are now among us. We have to be on guard so that we may realize what is happening when we encounter them and gain a real idea of where they are to be found. The most dangerous thing you can do in the immediate future will be to give yourself up unconsciously to the influences which are definitely present.” ~ Rudolf Steiner

  17. #74

  18. #75
    Quote Originally Posted by donnay View Post
    Yes very confused.

    Here is the vaccine insert for the MMR-II
    http://www.merck.com/product/usa/pi_.../mmr_ii_pi.pdf

    The side effects and contraindications are staggering.
    read all of it?

    “Events were included in this list because of the seriousness or frequency of reporting. Because these events are reported voluntarily from a population of uncertain size, it is not always possible to reliably estimate their frequencies or to establish a causal relationship to components of the vaccine.”
    Yes, some of the reported effects come from VAERS- I have provided links showing that in the past.

  19. #76
    Quote Originally Posted by Zippyjuan View Post
    Yes, some of the reported effects come from VAERS- I have provided links showing that in the past.
    Wrong. There is nothing in here about VAERS. Clinical trials conducted by pharmaceutical companies in preparing vaccines for the market do not use VAERS. You have provided nothing to show that, because it does not exist.
    There is no fear in love, but perfect love casts out fear. For fear has to do with punishment, and whoever fears has not been perfected in love.
    (1 John 4:18)

  20. #77
    As I posted earlier, the first potential side effects (mostly pain at the injection site) do come from the case studies. Effects reported from VAERS are added to the list.

  21. #78
    https://thelogicofscience.com/2016/0...are-dangerous/

    Debunking anti-vaccine arguments: VAERS, package inserts, and the VICP do not prove that vaccines are dangerous


    <snip>

    Conclusion


    In short, neither VAERS, nor the package inserts, nor the VICP provide evidence that vaccines are dangerous. VAERS and package inserts simply show adverse events that were reported following a vaccination, but they do not actually demonstrate that the vaccine caused the event in question. Indeed, both sources even state that the fact that an adverse event was included in them does not mean that the vaccine actually causes that event. Similarly, the VICP is a no-fault system, and applicants do not have to demonstrate that a vaccine caused the injury for which they are seeking compensation. Rather, they simply have to provide some evidence (such as expert testimony) that it is plausible that a vaccine caused the injury. Thus, none of these sources provide evidence of causation, so none of them can be used as evidence against vaccines. To be clear, vaccines do have side effects, as do essentially all real medications; however, to actually know which side effects are caused by vaccines, you need properly controlled studies, not glorified anecdotes. Further, even when a causal relationship has been demonstrated, you also have to consider the rate at which the injury occurs. Every decision has risks (including the decision not to vaccinate), and although vaccines do have complications, series side effects are extremely rare and the benefits are extremely high. Therefore, the benefits of vaccinating outweigh the risks, and vaccinating your children will give them the best chance of living long, healthy lives.

  22. #79
    3 Examples of Pro-Vaccination Hypocrisy


    By Tami Canal

    The common sense, or lack thereof, of some people truly baffles me and I have reached a point where I’m going to call out the hypocrisy of certain individuals. If the following offends you, I make no apologies. Instead, I encourage you to focus your outrage on the thousands of innocent victims of the CDC’s vaccination program. (Read more about that by clicking here.)

    If you advocate for any of the following issues, but allow your child to be vaccinated…you are a hypocrite.

    1. Pro-Life

    You cannot be pro-life and pro-vaccine…unless there’s a clause in the pro-life rule book that allows for the use of aborted fetal cells in vaccinations given to humans.

    This is not fear-mongering or “woo”, as the trolls will cry. It’s a plain and simple fact that a minimum of 27 vaccines contain aborted fetal tissue, DNA, proteins and cells including:

    -Hep A
    -Hep A/Hep B Combo
    -Polio
    -Dtap/Polio/HiB Combo
    -MMR
    -MMRV Pro Quad
    -Varicella
    -Shingles

    It’s shocking that little to no religious outcry exists and it’s mind boggling that pro-life advocates will denounce abortion, but seemingly condone the use of aborted fetal elements in vaccinations given to children.

    It’s also imperative that I mention that the research that is available on the safety of injecting human DNA into another human shows that there may be radical immune responses and can even cause death. You can read the research for yourself by clicking here, here, here, here, and here.

    Pro-pharma outlets claim that only two fetal cell lines are used, which is an outright lie. The two cell lines that have been admitted to be used in vaccines are:

    1. WI-38 cell line (US): a human diploid fibroblast cell line derived from a three month old fetus aborted “therapeutically” because the family felt they had too many children. (Source)

    2. MRC-5 cell line (UK): a cell line derived from lung fibroblasts of a 14 week old fetus due to “psychiatric” issues with the 27 year old mother. (Source)

    I’m sure pro-vaccine advocates are simply overlooking and in no way intentionally misleading the public about the fact that at least two other cell lines are being used:

    Eye tissue from a 21 week old fetus is currently used in flu shots, as well as experimental vaccines for malaria and cancer, and Merck’s PER.C6 cell line, derived from the eye tissue of an 18 week old fetus, is the cell line used in many of the 271 vaccines in the CDC’s pipeline.

    2. Anti-GMO/Anti-Monsanto

    A focal issue for the anti-GMO movement is the fact that Monsanto’s best-selling herbicide is used on approximately 90% of the conventional food supply, either intentionally or accidentally, as a result of contamination, Roundup drift, etc.

    While countries all over the world continue to ban the weedkiller, here in the states we can’t even get it regulated. Numerous independent studies have demonstrated that the herbicide is extremely toxic and has multiple, detrimental effects on the human body. (Here is a list of studies for you to read.)

    Glyphosate, Roundup’s key ingredient, is a ubiquitous poison and has been detected in air and rain samples, the breast milk of nursing mothers, prenatal vitamins, baby formula, and now our vaccines.

    Last year, Moms Across America funded research which confirmed glyphosate contamination in five different childhood vaccines:

    -DTap Adacel (Sanofi Pasteur) vaccine: 0.123 ppb
    -Influenza Fluvirin (Novaris): 0.331 ppb
    -HepB Energix-B (Glaxo Smith Kline): 0.325
    -Pneumonoccal Vax Polyvalent Pneumovax 23 (Merck): 0.107 ppb
    -MMR II (Merck): 2.671ppb

    “We were shocked to find the presence of glyphosate in all five of the vaccines and to find that the contamination of glyphosate has extended into our medical treatments. The fact is that the CDC, vaccine makers and our regulatory agencies should have been testing for herbicide/pesticide contamination 40 years ago before they started spraying these chemicals on our food and feed crops. If anyone questions these results we ask them to test.”
    -Zen Honeycutt, Moms Across America

    How does one justify refusing to eat food contaminated with glyphosate, but allow their child to receive a vaccine containing Monsanto’s weedkiller?

    There has never been a single safety study conducted on the effects of injecting glyphosate into humans, let alone an infant on the first day of life (Hep B).

    Glyphosate has been banned in countries all over the world due to its extreme toxicity. Studies have demonstrated that glyphosate causes infertility, miscarriages, birth defects, and various cancers. Glyphosate has been found in the umbilical cord blood of newborn babies, perhaps as a result of fetal exposure by way of the Novaris Flu shot…which has also never been tested for safety in children or pregnant women.

    It is foolish to believe that any level of glyphosate in the body is safe, regardless if it’s ingested or injected.

    3. Vegetarian/Vegan

    Let me get this straight. Pro-vaccine vegetarian/vegans refuse to eat animals, but don’t have an issue with injecting animal proteins, bovine cells, gelatin, and serum from the blood of aborted calf fetuses into their children.

    If you advocate for animal rights but support vaccines, you may want to check your hypocrisy.

    Fetal bovine serum, used in MMR, Varicella, and Rotavirus, is actually aborted fetal calf blood and according to the Humane Research Australia website:

    “After slaughter and bleeding of the cow at an abattoir, the mother’s uterus containing the calf fetus is removed during the evisceration process (removal of the mother’s internal organs) and transferred to the blood collection room. A needle is then inserted between the fetus’s ribs directly into its heart and the blood is vacuumed into a sterile collection bag. This process is aimed at minimizing the risk of contamination of the serum with micro-organisms from the fetus and its environment. Only fetuses over the age of three months are used otherwise the heart is considered too small to puncture.

    Once collected, the blood is allowed to clot at room temperature and the serum separated through a process known as refrigerated centrifugation.”

    Vegetarians and vegans who vaccinate, are you aware that embryos, cells, and DNA from dogs, chickens, monkeys, and mice are in those syringes? (Source)

    Here is a list of vaccines that include some form of an animal derivative:

    -Adenovirus
    -MMR
    -Rotavirus
    -Varicella
    -Influenza
    -DTaP
    -Polio
    -Japanese encephalitis
    -Rabies
    http://www.naturalblaze.com/2017/02/...hypocrisy.html
    “The spirits of darkness are now among us. We have to be on guard so that we may realize what is happening when we encounter them and gain a real idea of where they are to be found. The most dangerous thing you can do in the immediate future will be to give yourself up unconsciously to the influences which are definitely present.” ~ Rudolf Steiner

  23. #80
    1. Pro-Life

    You cannot be pro-life and pro-vaccine…unless there’s a clause in the pro-life rule book that allows for the use of aborted fetal cells in vaccinations given to humans.

    This is not fear-mongering or “woo”, as the trolls will cry. It’s a plain and simple fact that a minimum of 27 vaccines contain aborted fetal tissue, DNA, proteins and cells including:

    -Hep A
    -Hep A/Hep B Combo
    -Polio
    -Dtap/Polio/HiB Combo
    -MMR
    -MMRV Pro Quad
    -Varicella
    -Shingles

    It’s shocking that little to no religious outcry exists and it’s mind boggling that pro-life advocates will denounce abortion, but seemingly condone the use of aborted fetal elements in vaccinations given to children.

    It’s also imperative that I mention that the research that is available on the safety of injecting human DNA into another human shows that there may be radical immune responses and can even cause death. You can read the research for yourself by clicking here, here, here, here, and here.
    The Vatican has said it is more wrong to deny vaccines to protect pregnant women and children than to avoid vaccines made with the stem cells from one child aborted 40 years ago. The "greater good" is getting vaccinated and protecting their health according to the Church.

    http://www.immunize.org/concerns/vaticandocument.htm



  24. Remove this section of ads by registering.
  25. #81


    PDF Vaccines Contaminated with Heavy Metals
    http://medcraveonline.com/IJVV/IJVV-04-00072.pdf
    Dirty Vaccines: New Study Reveals Prevalence of Contaminants
    http://info.cmsri.org/the-driven-res...f-contaminants
    VACCINE EXEMPTIONFORMS
    http://experimentalvaccines.org/vacc...emption-forms/
    “The spirits of darkness are now among us. We have to be on guard so that we may realize what is happening when we encounter them and gain a real idea of where they are to be found. The most dangerous thing you can do in the immediate future will be to give yourself up unconsciously to the influences which are definitely present.” ~ Rudolf Steiner

  26. #82
    Posted before- at the start of the thread in fact. They found a few particles (molecules) per vaccine. A couple molecules aren't going to harm anybody. You get tons more in your Himalayan Sea Salt which includes things like uranium, plutonium. polonium, lead. But again- at insignificant quantities. You can find those in everything if you look for small enough pieces (molecules).

  27. #83
    Quote Originally Posted by Zippyjuan View Post
    Posted before- at the start of the thread in fact. They found a few particles (molecules) per vaccine. A couple molecules aren't going to harm anybody. You get tons more in your Himalayan Sea Salt which includes things like uranium, plutonium. polonium, lead. But again- at insignificant quantities. You can find those in everything if you look for small enough pieces (molecules).
    ETA: The video above has not been posted. Just proves you don't pay attention and then will argue about it without even viewing.

    And you keep on forgetting I digest Himalayan salt I do not digest particles that are injected.

    Example Aluminum:

    ...We previously showed that poorly biodegradable aluminum-coated particles injected into muscle are promptly phagocytosed in muscle and the draining lymph nodes, and can disseminate within phagocytic cells throughout the body and slowly accumulate in brain.
    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4318414/


    Intramuscular injection of alum-containing vaccine was associated with the appearance of aluminum deposits in distant organs, such as spleen and brain where they were still detected one year after injection. Both fluorescent materials injected into muscle translocated to draining lymph nodes (DLNs) and thereafter were detected associated with phagocytes in blood and spleen. Particles linearly accumulated in the brain up to the six-month endpoint; they were first found in perivascular CD11b+ cells and then in microglia and other neural cells. DLN ablation dramatically reduced the biodistribution. Cerebral translocation was not observed after direct intravenous injection, but significantly increased in mice with chronically altered blood-brain-barrier. Loss/gain-of-function experiments consistently implicated CCL2 in systemic diffusion of Al-Rho particles captured by monocyte-lineage cells and in their subsequent neurodelivery. Stereotactic particle injection pointed out brain retention as a factor of progressive particle accumulation.
    http://bmcmedicine.biomedcentral.com...741-7015-11-99
    Last edited by donnay; 03-01-2017 at 07:37 PM.
    “The spirits of darkness are now among us. We have to be on guard so that we may realize what is happening when we encounter them and gain a real idea of where they are to be found. The most dangerous thing you can do in the immediate future will be to give yourself up unconsciously to the influences which are definitely present.” ~ Rudolf Steiner

  28. #84
    Quote Originally Posted by Zippyjuan View Post
    Effects reported from VAERS are added to the list.
    What "list"? Certainly not added to package inserts for the product by the manufacturer, as you erroneously stated.

    Quote Originally Posted by Zippyjuan View Post
    to avoid vaccines made with the stem cells from one child aborted 40 years ago.
    New Aborted Fetal Cell Line Emerges for Vaccine Production

    (Largo) Due to dwindling capacity for existing aborted fetal cell lines to self-replicate, scientists in China have developed a new aborted fetal cell line, WALVAX 2 that will be used for viral vaccine production. The existing cell lines, MRC-5 and WI-38 are currently used in MMR, Varicella, Hepatitis-A, Shingles, some rabies and some polio vaccines.

    WALVAX 2 is taken from the lung tissue of a 3 month gestation female who was ultimately selected from among 9 aborted babies.
    Quoting the Vatican to support your position? Do you also believe the Pope is infallible?
    There is no fear in love, but perfect love casts out fear. For fear has to do with punishment, and whoever fears has not been perfected in love.
    (1 John 4:18)

  29. #85
    "Let it not be said that we did nothing." - Dr. Ron Paul. "Stand up for what you believe in, even if you are standing alone." - Sophie Magdalena Scholl
    "War is the health of the State." - Randolph Bourne "Freedom is the answer. ... Now, what's the question?" - Ernie Hancock.

  30. #86
    Here’s their report; New Quality-Control Investigations on Vaccines: Micro- and Nanocontamination (2017): http://medcraveonline.com/IJVV/IJVV-04-00072.php
    (archived here: http://archive.is/yyce3)

    These scientists used X-rays to measure what elements were in the vaccines. They investigated using “an X-ray”, the complete description “Field Emission Gun Environmental Electron Scanning Microscope equipped with the X-ray microprobe of an Energy Dispersive Spectroscope”…

    They found all sorts of dirty stuff in vaccines (with the exception of 1, if I remember correctly a vaccine for cats).
    The peaks show what kind of elements are in the vaccines.


    Table 3 describes the size and amount of “debris” found in the vaccines (I have no reason to believe that these were in the vaccines by “accident”).
    Infanrix hexa – 1821 “debris”.
    Varilrix - 2723 “debris”.
    Fluarix – 1317 “debris”.
    Cervarix – 1569 “debris”.
    Agrippal S1 – 1029 “debris”.

    Similar aggregates were found by other scientists in the blood of leukemic patients and in subjects affected by cryoglobulinemia...


    Recently the Italian scientists who published the report on the dirty material in vaccines were harassed by the cops and had their research material including computers confiscated: http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthr...cine-Discovery
    Last edited by Firestarter; 04-19-2018 at 08:28 AM.
    Do NOT ever read my posts. Google and Yahoo wouldn’t block them without a very good reason: Google-censors-the-world/page3

    The Order of the Garter rules the world: Order of the Garter and the Carolingian dynasty

  31. #87
    Infanrix hexa – 1821 “debris”.
    Varilrix - 2723 “debris”.
    Fluarix – 1317 “debris”.
    Cervarix – 1569 “debris”.
    Agrippal S1 – 1029 “debris”.
    1821 "debris"? What are the units? Tons? Molecules? How much are you really talking about here?

    Sounds scary, right? But what do those numbers really mean?

    https://respectfulinsolence.com/2017...contamination/

    The numbers are well below the level of biological activity, if these various chemicals even have biological activity (most don’t). For example, the authors found 1569 particles or precipitates in one drop of Cervarix (an anti-HPV vaccine). Sounds horrific right? Except that one drop of vaccine contains around 1.39 X 10^21 individual molecules. This so called contamination approximately 0.0000000000000000000719% of these so called contaminants.

    In that Cervarix sample, the researchers found aluminum hydroxide, one of those scary sounding compounds. Let’s say every one of those 1569 particles was aluminum hydroxide, it would mean that around 0.000000000001 ng of aluminum hydroxide in a vial of vaccine. That is simply biologically irrelevant. Even if the aluminum hydroxide was found, it’s level is so low, that the human body wouldn’t notice it. You breathe in more aluminum on a normal day than you would ever find in a vial of vaccine.
    Last edited by Zippyjuan; 04-21-2018 at 06:02 PM.

  32. #88
    I am going to post these flashbacks to show how Big pHARMa operates:

    Merck Created Hit List to "Destroy," "Neutralize" or "Discredit" Dissenting Doctors
    https://www.cbsnews.com/news/merck-c...nting-doctors/

    New Merck Allegations: A Fake Journal; Ghostwritten Studies; Vioxx Pop Songs; PR Execs Harass Reporters
    https://www.cbsnews.com/news/new-mer...ass-reporters/

    Merck target of Vioxx federal grand jury probe
    https://www.reuters.com/article/us-m...52M7A320090323
    “The spirits of darkness are now among us. We have to be on guard so that we may realize what is happening when we encounter them and gain a real idea of where they are to be found. The most dangerous thing you can do in the immediate future will be to give yourself up unconsciously to the influences which are definitely present.” ~ Rudolf Steiner



  33. Remove this section of ads by registering.
  34. #89
    Quote Originally Posted by Zippyjuan View Post
    Sounds scary, right? But what do those numbers really mean?

    https://respectfulinsolence.com/2017...contamination/
    Following quotes are from the big pharma supporting article posted by Zippyjuan and my comments...


    So divide 91,050,000 by Avogadro’s number, and you’ll get the molarity of a solution of 91,050,000 particle in a liter, as a 1 M solution would contain 6.023 x 1023 particles. So what’s the concentration:
    1.512 x 10-16 M. that’s 0.15 femtomolar (fM) (or 150 altomolar), an incrediblylow concentration. And that’s the highest amount the investigators found. In reality, what they actually found is that vaccines are incredibly pure!
    Yes, I know that I’ve simplified the calculations and that particles are not molecules [as has been pointed out in the comments]. I did it not to be perfectly scientifically, chemically accurate in a way that I’d do if I were in the lab doing an experiment.
    That´s ridiculous they didn´t report single molecules, but particles the size of nanometres or even millimetres...


    What were the controls?
    Asking for controls is similar to asking for controls (of the ruler) if somebody for example measures the length of 12-year-olds...


    The numbers are well below the level of biological activity, if these various chemicals even have biological activity (most don’t).
    Yes, laugh, because what Gatti and Montanari actually showed is that the level of inorganic contamination in vaccines is minuscule, suggesting that the manufacturing processes used to make them are very, very good at making sure that vaccines are pure, given that none of the vaccines contained more inorganic particles at a concentration higher than 0.15 femtomolar.
    All of the reported "chemicals" have a high toxicity.

    They used the spectrometer to measure which molecules were in the vaccines (besides giving a summary of the nano-particles and clusters found).
    A good follow-up study could be to determine the concentration of these toxics in these vaccines.
    Without further information it’s impossible to decide that the concentration is “miniscule”. This shows that these big pharma supporters are lying...
    Last edited by Firestarter; 04-21-2018 at 03:55 AM.
    Do NOT ever read my posts. Google and Yahoo wouldn’t block them without a very good reason: Google-censors-the-world/page3

    The Order of the Garter rules the world: Order of the Garter and the Carolingian dynasty

  35. #90
    All of the reported "chemicals" have a high toxicity.
    You are right- carbon (C), salt (Na+Cl), and oxygen (O) can be extremely deadly.


Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast


Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 7
    Last Post: 04-19-2015, 08:33 PM
  2. Replies: 27
    Last Post: 06-07-2013, 04:02 PM
  3. Replies: 1
    Last Post: 09-16-2011, 12:50 PM
  4. BAYER exposed: Sold vaccines contaminated with HIV/AIDS
    By jdmyprez_deo_vindice in forum Health Freedom
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 10-22-2010, 10:03 PM
  5. Replies: 5
    Last Post: 06-19-2010, 07:40 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •