The Sovietization of the American Press

[Todd]

I'm not going to agree with Taibbi on much of the solutions, but I respect him calling this out.

https://nationalpost.com/opinion/mat...american-press

The transformation from phony "objectivity" to open one-party orthodoxy hasn't been an improvement

I collect Soviet newspapers. Years ago, I used to travel to Moscow’s Izmailovsky flea market every few weeks, hooking up with a dealer who crisscrossed the country digging up front pages from the Cold War era. I have Izvestia’s celebration of Gagarin’s flight, a Pravda account of a 1938 show trial, even an ancient copy of Ogonyek with Trotsky on the cover that someone must have taken a risk to keep.

These relics, with dramatic block fonts and red highlights, are cool pieces of history. Not so cool: the writing! Soviet newspapers were wrought with such anvil shamelessness that it’s difficult to imagine anyone ever read them without laughing. A good Soviet could write almost any Pravda headline in advance. What else but “A Mighty Demonstration of the Union of the Party and the People” fit the day after Supreme Soviet elections? What news could come from the Spanish civil war but “Success of the Republican Fleet?” Who could earn an obit headline but a “Faithful Son of the Party”?

Reality in Soviet news was 100 per cent binary, with all people either heroes or villains, and the villains all in league with one another (an SR was no better than a fascist or a “Right-Trotskyite Bandit,” a kind of proto-horseshoe theory). Other ideas were not represented, except to be attacked and deconstructed. Also, since anything good was all good, politicians were not described as people at all but paragons of limitless virtue — 95 per cent of most issues of Pravda or Izvestia were just names of party leaders surrounded by lists of applause-words, like “glittering,” “full-hearted,” “wise,” “mighty,” “courageous,” “in complete moral-political union with the people,” etc.

Some of the headlines in the U.S. press lately sound suspiciously like this kind of work:

— Biden stimulus showers money on Americans, sharply cutting poverty

— Champion of the middle class comes to the aid of the poor

— Biden’s historic victory for America

The most Soviet of the recent efforts didn’t have a classically Soviet headline. “Comedians are struggling to parody Biden. Let’s hope this doesn’t last,” read the Washington Post opinion piece by Richard Zoglin, arguing that Biden is the first president in generations who might be “impervious to impressionists.” Zoglin contended Biden is “impregnable” to parody, his voice being too “devoid of obvious quirks,” his manner too “muted and self-effacing” to offer comedians much to work with. He was talking about this person: Continued:

[Matt4Liberty]

It's actually much worse than Soviet / communist propaganda. The commie propaganda outlets preferred to leave out facts that were inconvenient to them. They avoided adding absurdities that would have made them look completely foolish. The current crop keeps going down the ridiculousness rabbit hole, and if you try to point out that up is up and down is down, you are branded a heretic.

[Joe McCarthy]

It's actually much worse than Soviet / communist propaganda. The commie propaganda outlets preferred to leave out facts that were inconvenient to them. They avoided adding absurdities that would have made them look completely foolish. The current crop keeps going down the ridiculousness rabbit hole, and if you try to point out that up is up and down is down, you are branded a heretic.

Pravda on steroids.

[Anti Globalist]

That awkward moment when the MSM's propaganda is even worse than North Korea's.