I see them more as a cross between devils and livestock owners, where we're the livestock. They take our interests into consideration only inasmuch as they overlap with their own. They want us to continue to produce for them, so, as long as they can keep that going, they'd prefer we not die. And while they're at it, if they can find ways to get the goose to squawk less while still taking as many or more feathers off of it, they'll make use of those methods.
Nothing you said would support preferring direct taxation over money printing in any amount, if it really were the case that they didn't have to rely on both. But they do have to rely on both. The two means mutually support each other and maximize the amount of the economy under the feds' control. They couldn't give up either one and rely solely on the other without losing some of that control.
Site Information
About Us
- RonPaulForums.com is an independent grassroots outfit not officially connected to Ron Paul but dedicated to his mission. For more information see our Mission Statement.
Connect With Us