Another example:
Again, over a roughly 50 year period, this is in the UK, anti smoking
jihads have all but banned tobacco, anti pollution
fatwas have all but banned any heavy industry, cars give off the equivalent of unicorn farts and roses in their exhaust (still not enough, the UK is banning all IC vehicles by 2040) and after all of that lung cancer rates are
climbing.
"Pollution" is blamed, even though quantifiable pollution has decreased drastically over the past 50 years.
I happen to think these rising rates of cancer are due to EMF radiation from a million sources.
But banning that would put a kibosh on the interconnected surveillance state.
Can't have
that...
Pollution blamed for lung cancer in people who have never smoked
https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/p...oked-r52fr7m89
Lung cancer rates among non-smokers have doubled over the past decade amid concerns that high levels of air pollution lie behind the rise, a study shows.
The number of lung cancer deaths among people who have never smoked will overtake deaths from smoking- related cancer within a decade if the trend continues, according to the UK’s largest cancer surgery centre.
Researchers worry that this shift would make the condition, which is the deadliest form of cancer, even harder to diagnose and treat in time. There are 46,400 new cases and 36,000 associated deaths in Britain each year, and only one in 20 patients survives for more than ten years.
Connect With Us