Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 61 to 79 of 79

Thread: Judge Napolitano meets with Trump for a full hour

  1. #61
    Quote Originally Posted by Superfluous Man View Post
    Which proves that you don't love most things about Ron Paul.
    Last edited by LibertyEagle; 12-16-2016 at 09:52 AM.
    ================
    Open Borders: A Libertarian Reappraisal or why only dumbasses and cultural marxists are for it.

    Cultural Marxism: The Corruption of America

    The Property Basis of Rights



  2. Remove this section of ads by registering.
  3. #62
    Quote Originally Posted by devil21 View Post
    Yeah, since billionaires, Goldman bankers and oil CEOs have been so underrepresented in positions of power that it's time for the little guy to take a break from running things under a Trump administration and let the billionaires, bankers and oil CEOs steer the ship for a while.

    I assure you the NWO is not shaking in their boots at the thought of Gary $#@!in' Cohn as Trump's top econ guy. Did you know that all male CEOs of major corporations are freemasons? Female CEOs are wives of masons, too.

    Wake me when Trump actually picks someone for any position that's not been part of the swamp for the last bazillion years. Meet with Rand, Judge Nap, etc? Great. But it's still just meetings and would be to appease folks like you into thinking Trump is anything other than what he's so far shown himself to be through his hirings.
    So what? I'm a freemason and you don't see me preaching NWO bS... methinks you've watched too many interwebz videos...
    There are only two things we should fight for. One is the defense of our homes and the other is the Bill of Rights. War for any other reason is simply a racket.
    -Major General Smedley Butler, USMC,
    Two-Time Congressional Medal of Honor Winner
    Author of, War is a Racket!

    It is not that I am mad, it is only that my head is different from yours.
    - Diogenes of Sinope

  4. #63
    Quote Originally Posted by helmuth_hubener View Post
    Is this real?

    Did this actually happen?!?!
    itshappening.gif
    It's all about taking action and not being lazy. So you do the work, whether it's fitness or whatever. It's about getting up, motivating yourself and just doing it.
    - Kim Kardashian

    Donald Trump / Crenshaw 2024!!!!

    My pronouns are he/him/his

  5. #64
    Let's not forget that Trump also met with 'his good friend' Henry $#@!ing Kissinger, Al Gore, and many other unsavory creatures. Good that the Judge had his ear, not holding my breath for a sudden surge in Constitutionalism in government.
    There are only two things we should fight for. One is the defense of our homes and the other is the Bill of Rights. War for any other reason is simply a racket.
    -Major General Smedley Butler, USMC,
    Two-Time Congressional Medal of Honor Winner
    Author of, War is a Racket!

    It is not that I am mad, it is only that my head is different from yours.
    - Diogenes of Sinope



  6. Remove this section of ads by registering.
  7. #65
    Quote Originally Posted by osan View Post
    Pretty sure? Based on what?
    an un-named source.

  8. #66
    Quote Originally Posted by juleswin View Post
    Sadly, this is true. I don't think even Rand could get away with nominating him. But the funny thing is that if there was one person who could do it, it is Trump. But hopefully he can pass him the names of some of his good judge friends. Hopefully one without a TV history of espousing libertarian principles. Some undercover like Judge Roberts
    WHAT? Justice Roberts has turned out to be pretty horrid.
    ================
    Open Borders: A Libertarian Reappraisal or why only dumbasses and cultural marxists are for it.

    Cultural Marxism: The Corruption of America

    The Property Basis of Rights

  9. #67
    Trump met with Napolitano because he believes a President Trump can profit using his office all he wants without violating the Constitution. He says this in the video linked below. The relevant Clause in the Constitution, usually called the Emolument Clause, is below, and isn't the one given in the Fox News article with the video clip of Nap saying this.
    Article I, Section 9, Clause 8:
    No Title of Nobility shall be granted by the United States: And no Person holding any Office of Profit or Trust under them, shall, without the Consent of the Congress, accept of any present, Emolument, Office, or Title, of any kind whatever, from any King, Prince, or foreign State.”
    http://insider.foxnews.com/2016/11/2...luments-clause
    Last edited by robert68; 12-20-2016 at 12:34 AM.

  10. #68
    Quote Originally Posted by jllundqu View Post
    So what? I'm a freemason and you don't see me preaching NWO bS... methinks you've watched too many interwebz videos...
    You really don't want to go there, lest I spoil your future surprise.
    "Let it not be said that we did nothing."-Ron Paul

    "We have set them on the hobby-horse of an idea about the absorption of individuality by the symbolic unit of COLLECTIVISM. They have never yet and they never will have the sense to reflect that this hobby-horse is a manifest violation of the most important law of nature, which has established from the very creation of the world one unit unlike another and precisely for the purpose of instituting individuality."- A Quote From Some Old Book

  11. #69
    Hopefully Judge didn't harp on too much pro-life crap.

  12. #70
    Quote Originally Posted by Murray N Rothbard View Post
    Hopefully Judge didn't harp on too much pro-life crap.
    Why's that crap?

  13. #71
    Quote Originally Posted by Natural Citizen View Post
    Why's that crap?

    maybe he's feeling guilty about giving his girlfriend an abortion?...

  14. #72
    Quote Originally Posted by Natural Citizen View Post
    Why's that crap?
    Quote Originally Posted by JK/SEA View Post
    maybe he's feeling guilty about giving his girlfriend an abortion?...

    Well most people believe Trump is pro choice and only took pro life chances because he was running for the republican nomination. The assumption is that Trump would be nominating centrist supreme court judges due to his political ideology. He was basically just hoping the judge didn't disqualify himself in Trumps eyes from being considered for the supreme court, because we would want him on the supreme court.



  15. Remove this section of ads by registering.
  16. #73
    Quote Originally Posted by devil21 View Post
    You really don't want to go there, lest I spoil your future surprise.
    yeah ok.
    There are only two things we should fight for. One is the defense of our homes and the other is the Bill of Rights. War for any other reason is simply a racket.
    -Major General Smedley Butler, USMC,
    Two-Time Congressional Medal of Honor Winner
    Author of, War is a Racket!

    It is not that I am mad, it is only that my head is different from yours.
    - Diogenes of Sinope

  17. #74
    I hope Nap gave Trump a good dose of ANARCHY.
    "Building Freedom in an Unfree World" - http://freedomlovin.com

    "All initiation of force is a violation of someone else's rights, whether initiated by an individual or the state, for the benefit of an individual or group of individuals, even if it's supposed to be for the benefit of another individual or group of individuals."
    -Ron Paul

  18. #75
    Quote Originally Posted by Murray N Rothbard View Post
    Hopefully Judge didn't harp on too much pro-life crap.
    Why not?

  19. #76
    Quote Originally Posted by nikcers View Post
    Well most people believe Trump is pro choice and only took pro life chances because he was running for the republican nomination. The assumption is that Trump would be nominating centrist supreme court judges due to his political ideology. He was basically just hoping the judge didn't disqualify himself in Trumps eyes from being considered for the supreme court, because we would want him on the supreme court.
    I don't think Napolitano being on the Supreme Court is an option.

  20. #77
    Quote Originally Posted by Superfluous Man View Post
    I don't think Napolitano being on the Supreme Court is an option.
    Well, it'd give me some hope in things anyway. That's really the only thing I really cared about this cycle.

  21. #78
    ..
    Last edited by robert68; 12-20-2016 at 01:36 AM.

  22. #79
    nm
    Last edited by devil21; 12-20-2016 at 08:28 AM.
    "Let it not be said that we did nothing."-Ron Paul

    "We have set them on the hobby-horse of an idea about the absorption of individuality by the symbolic unit of COLLECTIVISM. They have never yet and they never will have the sense to reflect that this hobby-horse is a manifest violation of the most important law of nature, which has established from the very creation of the world one unit unlike another and precisely for the purpose of instituting individuality."- A Quote From Some Old Book

Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123


Similar Threads

  1. Trump Insider: Judge Andrew Napolitano is Trump's First Choice for Supreme Court
    By goldenequity in forum 2016 Presidential Election: GOP & Dem
    Replies: 133
    Last Post: 05-18-2016, 08:12 PM
  2. Walter Jones meets with Judge Napolitano
    By TaftFan in forum Walter Jones Forum
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: 06-05-2013, 07:11 PM
  3. Judge Napolitano - Freedoms Greatest Hour of Danger is NOW!!!
    By DamianTV in forum U.S. Political News
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 12-03-2011, 01:47 PM
  4. Replies: 6
    Last Post: 10-12-2010, 09:50 PM
  5. Judge Napolitano on Alex Jones for the next hour.
    By Anti Federalist in forum U.S. Political News
    Replies: 21
    Last Post: 03-25-2010, 01:51 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •