The Distributed Election Fraud Model

[PRB]

No Court has even looked at any evidence at all.

Refused to do so.

they all had a hearing and when asked, not a single one of the lawyers claimed "we believe there are substantial votes which were fraudulent or outcome changing"

they all relied on technicalities and procedural arguments, so contrary to your conspiracy theory, even the lawyers didn't think this "evidence" would hold up in court. they only shine this around idiots like you who don't know what actually goes on in courts.

[CaptUSA]

they all had a hearing and when asked, not a single one of the lawyers claimed "we believe there are substantial votes which were fraudulent or outcome changing"

they all relied on technicalities and procedural arguments, so contrary to your conspiracy theory, even the lawyers didn't think this "evidence" would hold up in court. they only shine this around idiots like you who don't know what actually goes on in courts.

When you say, "they all had a hearing", what are you talking about? Most of these cases were denied for standing and never got to a review of the evidence.

[pcosmar]

they all had a hearing and when asked, not a single one of the lawyers claimed "we believe there are substantial votes which were fraudulent or outcome changing"

they all relied on technicalities and procedural arguments, so contrary to your conspiracy theory, even the lawyers didn't think this "evidence" would hold up in court. they only shine this around idiots like you who don't know what actually goes on in courts.

SHOW ME
show me ONE ruling on the basis of Evidence..

None has gotten into a Court.. ALL have been refused at the Clerks office..


The case has never seen a courtroom.

[phill4paul]

Well I'll just throw in my thoughts....

This defense that "there are not substantial votes which were fraudulent or outcome changing." Mean absolutely SQUAT. It's not necessarily about the out come of this last election. It is about the next, and the next, and the next.

Every instance of fraud needs to be tracked down and those involved prosecuted to the highest extent of the law. In fact tougher penalties need to apply.

I'd suggest firing squad.

[PRB]

SHOW ME
show me ONE ruling on the basis of Evidence..

None has gotten into a Court.. ALL have been refused at the Clerks office..


The case has never seen a courtroom.

show me ONE filing that claims there's substantial fraud to overturn any state's election outcome.

[PRB]

It's not necessarily about the out come of this last election.

No, it is. It's the only reason Republicans cared. They didn't care in 2016 when they won.

[PRB]

When you say, "they all had a hearing", what are you talking about? Most of these cases were denied for standing and never got to a review of the evidence.

there's no evidence if there's no standing, omg you're dense