Roger Stone Calling for Trump to Resist If He Loses

[RonZeplin]

Donnell will count every vote over & over until Kavinaugh & the wise latinas declare him the winner.

Roger Stone Calling for Trump to Resist If He Loses



Pardoned Roger Stone is making extraordinary calls for President Donald Trump to invoke the Insurrection Act if he loses on Election Day.

"I don't want to overplay the facts here, but if somebody would study the president's authority in the Insurrection Act and his ability to impose Martial Law if there's widespread [fraud], if he will have the ability to arrest [Facebook founder Mark] Zuckerberg, to arrest [Apple CEO] Tim Cook, to arrest the Clintons, to arrest anybody else who can be proven to be involved in illegal activity," Stone, political trickster, told Alex Jones' "InfoWars" on Thursday.

"I do not advocate preventive detention, but people who commit crimes and think they can continue to get away with it, because we have a two-tiered justice, are just wrong."

Stone pointed to mass mail ballot fraud and said the Republicans leaders in the states "are not prepared for this election legally."

"There's going to be widespread, obvious, blatant, flagrant illegality," Stone continued. "The authority exists to stop that. It will have to be used, if necessary.

"I'm not jumping the gun, but I will just tell you: The votes from Nevada should not be counted. They are already flooded with illegals. If Harry Reid is involved, take Harry Reid into custody and charge him."

Harry Reid was the Democrat Senate majority leader during the Obama administration and is now retired in Nevada.

"This is not complicated and it is 100% legal," Stone concluded.

https://www.newsmax.com/politics/ins...665/?oRef=mixi

[Anti Globalist]

The only one thats going to be resisting if they lose is Biden. Hillary already said that if he loses he should not accept it.

[Anti Federalist]

RonZep: resisting partisan hackery with...partisan hackery.

[69360]

I don't think anyone needs to call for Trump to do it. He already plans to.

I also don't think either side is going to accept this election result. We are in for chaos no matter who wins.

[kahless]

RonZep: resisting partisan hackery with...partisan hackery.

Sounds about right.

[CaptainAmerica]

This has been a coup plot since 2016, we now know because of Obamagate. Anyhow, prepare for war.

it will go hot by next year at this rate

[RonZeplin]

RonZep: resisting partisan hackery with...partisan hackery.

Wut? I oppose both of the D&R party presidential candidates.

[Anti Globalist]

I don't think anyone needs to call for Trump to do it. He already plans to.

I also don't think either side is going to accept this election result. We are in for chaos no matter who wins.

True, but we know who's going to be causing the most chaos if they lose.

[RonZeplin]

True, but we know who's going to be causing the most chaos if they lose.

President Donnell Trump, Steve Mnuchin, Nancy & Mitch have a proven track record of Wealth Spread Communism and Global Wahhabi Law Totalitarian tyranny.

At least with chaos, there's some chance of improvement & possible wins for liberty. .




Wahhabi Law council.

[John-G]

The only one thats going to be resisting if they lose is Biden. Hillary already said that if he loses he should not accept it.

True, but we know who's going to be causing the most chaos if they lose.

True? I thought you said only Biden will be resisting? do you think may be its time to drop the blatant dem v republican line you push on this site with virtually every single post you make?

[Ender]

Wut? I oppose both of the D&R party presidential candidates.

Same.

2nd verse, same as the first.

[r3volution 3.0]

There are elements among both political tribes trying to bring about serious civil unrest.

I hope and expect (though with decreasing confidence) that cooler heads will prevail.

...interesting times.

[69360]

True, but we know who's going to be causing the most chaos if they lose.

Honestly I believe both will.

[r3volution 3.0]

Honestly I believe both will.

Yep, and it doesn't matter who starts it; they'll radicalize each other.

The best outcome would be for someone, whoever, to win by a very large margin, so that it can't plausibly be challenged.

...some will never accept the outcome no matter what, but most will accept it if it's clear.

But if it's close, whoever wins, there's going to be chaos.

[Brian4Liberty]

There are elements among both political tribes trying to bring about serious civil unrest.

I hope and expect (though with decreasing confidence) that cooler heads will prevail.

...interesting times.

Trump is running a re-election campaign. The Democrats are running a color revolution. Slight difference.

[TheCount]

Why even hold an election if the outcome is known ahead of time?

[r3volution 3.0]

Trump is running a re-election campaign. The Democrats are running a color revolution. Slight difference.

When both sides are convinced by self-serving charlatans that war with the other side is inevitable, it is, when it otherwise wouldn't be.

It's very difficult to get perspective on the scene of which you yourself are part.

[DiverseSegregation]

The Dems are probably already orchestrating their new impeachment talking points on how Trump is an illegitimate president in 2021.