So if mankind will make tribes, fiefdoms, or self-govern what-have-you, then the State vs Chaos dilemma is false. There's chaos within States, and inflicted by them, enough to go around for generations. The State isn't magically inevitable, it doesn't protect our personal Liberty, and all its amounted to, after 400 years trying, is a cluster$#@! bigger than any previously tried.
So this one's for anybody who's read this far: what's wrong with libertarians living parallel to, but as far from within, the State as they can get? Anarchy doesn't have to mean chaos if you're living self-governed as best you can. It doesn't necessarily mean balaclava and molotovs, if the libertarian has taken the appropriate actions towards anarchic, sovereign living.
The op might ask instead, "should libertarians support open warfare with the State?" Do we need to review what happens, when people go to war with the FBI? They lose. Always.
Site Information
About Us
- RonPaulForums.com is an independent grassroots outfit not officially connected to Ron Paul but dedicated to his mission. For more information see our Mission Statement.
Connect With Us