He can't speak openly just because CPAC decided to dis-invite him to the conference? or that his publisher a private firm decided they no longer wanted to associate with him? what happened to freedom of association? As for breitbart, he quit the gig because he wrongfully believed that his association would impede whatever it is they are doing over there.
And there is a little progress here, a private company did what they wanted to do regardless of the victim status of the target. I hate to live in a world where private companies are afraid to act because the target has a child sexual abuse card up their butt. Ignore your personal bias and see that what just happened is a small win for freedom.
Site Information
About Us
- RonPaulForums.com is an independent grassroots outfit not officially connected to Ron Paul but dedicated to his mission. For more information see our Mission Statement.
Connect With Us