Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 30 of 36

Thread: Report: Trump, Australian PM Turnbull have tense phone call over Muslim refugees

  1. #1

    Report: Trump, Australian PM Turnbull have tense phone call over Muslim refugees

    http://www.cbsnews.com/news/trump-au...slim-refugees/

    CANBERRA, Australia -- Australia’s prime minister said his country’s relationship with the United States remained “very strong” but refused to comment on a newspaper report on Thursday that an angry President Donald Trump cut short their first telephone call as national leaders.

    At the heart of the weekend conversation between Mr. Trump and Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull was a deal struck with the Obama administration that would allow mostly Muslim refugees rejected by Australia to be resettled in the United States.

    Late Wednesday evening, Mr. Trump tweeted a complaint about the deal, referring to the 1,250 refugees that were agreed upon in the deal as “thousands.”

    Donald J. Trump ✔ @realDonaldTrump

    Do you believe it? The Obama Administration agreed to take thousands of illegal immigrants from Australia. Why? I will study this dumb deal!
    7:55 PM - 1 Feb 2017
    Turnbull declined to comment on reports in The Washington Post that the president had described the agreement as “the worst deal ever” and accused Turnbull of seeking to export the “next Boston bombers.”

    Turnbull initially would not say whether Mr. Trump had abruptly ended the expected hour-long conversation after 25 minutes as the Australian attempted to steer the conversation to other topics.

    “It’s better that these things - these conversations - are conducted candidly, frankly, privately,” Turnbull told reporters.

    Turnbull did, however, tell reporters about what Mr. Trump said about the refugee agreement.

    “The President assured me that he would continue with, honor the agreement we entered into with the Obama administration with respect to refugee resettlement,” Turnbull said.

    In another interview, with Sydney radio station 2GB, Turnbull denied Mr. Trump had hung up on him, saying the conversation had ended “courteously.”

    Under the agreement, refugees from among around 1,600 asylum seekers, most of whom are on island camps on the Pacific nations of Nauru and Papua New Guinea, would be resettled in the U.S. Australia has refused to accept them and instead pays for them to be housed on the impoverished islands.

    “I can assure you the relationship is very strong,” Turnbull said. “The fact we received the assurance that we did, the fact that it was confirmed, the very extensive engagement we have with the new administration underlines the closeness of the alliance. But as Australians know me very well: I stand up for Australia in every forum - public or private.”

    The Washington Post story immediately shot to the top of trending topics on Twitter in Australia. It was plastered across the top of Australia’s major news sites, and the nation’s news networks launched into lengthy, running commentaries on it.

    President Trump, who a day before the conversation had signed an executive order suspending the admission of refugees, had complained that he was “going to get killed” politically by the deal, the newspaper reported, citing anonymous officials.

    “I don’t want these people,” Mr. Trump reportedly said. He also told Turnbull that he had spoken to four world leaders that day and “This is the worst call by far.” Among the other world leaders Mr. Trump spoke with that day was Russian President Vladimir Putin.

    The president told Turnbull that it was “my intention” to honor the agreement, a phrase designed to leave the president wriggle room to back out of the deal, the newspaper reported.

    There were some mixed-messages from Washington this week on the state of the agreement.

    White House spokesman Sean Spicer confirmed on Wednesday that Mr. Trump had agreed to honor the deal.

    But a White House statement sent to Australian Broadcasting Corp. on Thursday said: “The president is still considering whether or not he will move forward with this deal at this time.”

    The U.S. State Department said in a statement later Thursday that the United States would honor the agreement “out of respect for close ties to our Australian ally and friend.”

    “President Trump’s decision to honor the refugee agreement has not changed and Spokesman Spicer’s comments stand,”
    the State Department said.

    The ABC spoke to senior Australian government sources who said The Washington Post report was “substantially accurate.”

    Australian officials said the conversation was “robust” and “shorter than expected,” while one minister has told the ABC that “Trump hates this deal.”



  2. Remove this section of ads by registering.
  3. #2
    LOL at least he let the guy know his inauguration crowd photos were fake and there were really millions of people there.
    “I don’t think that there will be any curtailing of Donald Trump as president,” he said. "He controls the media, he controls the sentiment [and] he controls everybody. He’s the one who will resort to executive orders more so than [President] Obama ever used them." - Ron Paul

  4. #3
    refugees from australia?wait im confused....what the fuq

  5. #4
    Quote Originally Posted by CaptainAmerica View Post
    refugees from australia?wait im confused....what the fuq
    They have been stuck on some islands in the South Pacific.

    Under the agreement, refugees from among around 1,600 asylum seekers, most of whom are on island camps on the Pacific nations of Nauru and Papua New Guinea, would be resettled in the U.S. Australia has refused to accept them and instead pays for them to be housed on the impoverished islands.

  6. #5
    Quote Originally Posted by CaptainAmerica View Post
    refugees from australia?wait im confused....what the fuq
    They're refugees from elsewhere that got to Australia and they don't want them.

    FWIW, I asked my single Australian friend and she thinks it's bull$#@! that they're trying to pawn them off on US. There's my anecdata.
    Quote Originally Posted by Swordsmyth View Post
    Pinochet is the model
    Quote Originally Posted by Swordsmyth View Post
    Liberty preserving authoritarianism.
    Quote Originally Posted by Swordsmyth View Post
    Enforced internal open borders was one of the worst elements of the Constitution.

  7. #6
    Quote Originally Posted by TheCount View Post
    They're refugees from elsewhere that got to Australia and they don't want them.

    FWIW, I asked my single Australian friend and she thinks it's bull$#@! that they're trying to pawn them off on US. There's my anecdata.
    oh I get it.....Australia doesn't want them so they ship them here?

  8. #7
    Quote Originally Posted by CaptainAmerica View Post
    oh I get it.....Australia doesn't want them so they ship them here?
    As Zippy mentioned, they built some refugee camps on islands and sticks them all there indefinitely. I'm not really sure about the why's of any of that, but assumed that it might be some Guantanamo-esque $#@! where they can treat them differently if they're not on Australia proper. Apparently Obama agreed to take half. I don't really know all the details.
    Quote Originally Posted by Swordsmyth View Post
    Pinochet is the model
    Quote Originally Posted by Swordsmyth View Post
    Liberty preserving authoritarianism.
    Quote Originally Posted by Swordsmyth View Post
    Enforced internal open borders was one of the worst elements of the Constitution.

  9. #8
    Don't worry... McCain's got this. Thank heavens.



  10. Remove this section of ads by registering.
  11. #9
    Put them on an old ready for the bone orchard Navy ship and then park it off the coast of Iran. US abandon ship and leave refugees. Tell Iran not to touch the ship.

  12. #10
    https://www.theguardian.com/world/20...d-for-refugees

    A short history of Nauru, Australia’s dumping ground for refugees


    Australia has twice used Nauru – and its beholden and broke government – as a remote site for the “offshore processing” of people who seek asylum and protection. What began as a hurried political response to the arrival of one boat, the MV Tampa, on Australia’s northern horizon has metamorphosed over a decade and a half into a standing permanent policy, with the support of both the country’s major political parties.

    It is current government policy that no person who arrives in the country by boat seeking asylum (plane arrivals are not subject to “mandatory detention”) is ever settled in Australia. Instead, they are sent to Nauru, or to Papua New Guinea’s Manus Island, for “offshore processing”, a bleak dysphemism because no genuine resettlement ever takes place.

    In effect, people accused of no crime are warehoused in appalling conditions in arbitrary and indefinite detention. Dozens of countries, the United Nations, and rights groups including Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch, have documented and condemned the illegal detention.

    In comparison with the size of the world’s forced migration challenge, the numbers are tiny. The latest statistics, for the end of June, show there are 442 asylum seekers and refugees living in the Nauru “regional processing centre”, including 49 children. Several hundred more live “in the community” of Nauru. They fall outside the scope of the government’s statistics but remain stuck on the tiny island. The “travel documents” some have been issued are not travel documents at all. They do not allow their holders to travel anywhere.

    More than three-quarters (77%) of those forcibly sent by Australia to Nauru whose asylum claims have been assessed have been found to be refugees. They have a “well-founded fear of persecution” and are legally owed protection. But no refugees will be resettled permanently on Nauru. The island’s government has avowedly refused to let anyone stay longer than five years. Other places will need to be found. So far the Australian government has found only one other country willing to take part in this state-sponsored “country shopping”: Cambodia. At a cost of more than $40m, it has managed to resettle one person. A single Rohingyan man.

    The first Nauru experiment began in 2001, after the Tampa crisis, when a Norwegian freighter that had rescued more than 400 mainly Afghan Hazara refugees from their sinking vessel in international waters 140km north of Christmas Island was refused entry into Australian waters, in defiance of international law. With boats carrying asylum seekers arriving consistently – as they have on and off since the mid-1970s – and with immigration proving a divisive, possibly critical issue in a federal election campaign, the MV Tampa provided the conservative Coalition government with a catalyst for action. That was the establishment of “offshore detention” camps on Nauru and on Papua New Guinea, the so-called Pacific solution.
    More at link.

  13. #11
    Most Australians don't want the refugees, but also don't want them locked away on a remote island. Ditching refugees on the U.S. was some creative problem solving, to say the least. Some Aussie politicians must be freaking out right now...

  14. #12
    Like Trump or not (and if you do like him, you're dumb), why in the world does he keep tweeting like this?

    Seriously.

  15. #13
    He can't help himself.

  16. #14
    Quote Originally Posted by Superfluous Man View Post
    Like Trump or not (and if you do like him, you're dumb), why in the world does he keep tweeting like this?

    Seriously.
    Attention whore, mentally unbalanced, no self control, no brain to mouth filter. Some combination of that I'm sure.

    If Trump starts a war with Australia...

  17. #15
    Quote Originally Posted by Superfluous Man View Post
    Like Trump or not (and if you do like him, you're dumb), why in the world does he keep tweeting like this?

    Seriously.

    EGO.

    Seriously.
    There is no spoon.

  18. #16
    It is a 90 day review not a real ban. My guess is that the policies the courts did not over turn will be rescinded at the end of the review. People do not understand that priority refugee visas go to the interpreters, local coordinators, fighters and their families that help the US carry out their imperialist wars. If they take it away, the lose some leverage over them and even the neocon Trump would understand that when the time comes.



  19. Remove this section of ads by registering.
  20. #17
    Quote Originally Posted by Superfluous Man View Post
    Like Trump or not (and if you do like him, you're dumb), why in the world does he keep tweeting like this?

    Seriously.
    wtf would we want these refugees either? he is right on this, bad deal.

  21. #18
    Quote Originally Posted by TheCount View Post

    FWIW, I asked my single Australian friend and she thinks it's bull$#@! that they're trying to pawn them off on US.
    Is she cute?
    Quote Originally Posted by dannno View Post
    It's a balance between appeasing his supporters, appeasing the deep state and reaching his own goals.
    ~Resident Badgiraffe




  22. #19
    Quote Originally Posted by 69360 View Post
    Attention whore, mentally unbalanced, no self control, no brain to mouth filter. Some combination of that I'm sure.

    If Trump starts a war with Australia...
    That's some strong language you used against Super E, even if he called many of the forum membership "dumb."
    ...

  23. #20
    Banned


    Blog Entries
    1
    Posts
    7,273
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Quote Originally Posted by Superfluous Man View Post
    Like Trump or not (and if you do like him, you're dumb), why in the world does he keep tweeting like this?

    Seriously.
    To bypass the Mainstream media filter. To control the narrative. Seriously. If you read more than your MSM crap, you would read point blank many non-MSM people talking about why he tweets.

  24. #21
    Quote Originally Posted by Superfluous Man View Post
    Like Trump or not (and if you do like him, you're dumb), why in the world does he keep tweeting like this?

    Seriously.
    Because he's awesome!

    lol
    1. Don't lie.
    2. Don't cheat.
    3. Don't steal.
    4. Don't kill.
    5. Don't commit adultery.
    6. Don't covet what your neighbor has, especially his wife.
    7. Honor your father and mother.
    8. Remember the Sabbath and keep it Holy.
    9. Don’t use your Higher Power's name in vain, or anyone else's.
    10. Do unto others as you would have them do to you.

    "For the love of money is the root of all evil..." -- I Timothy 6:10, KJV

  25. #22
    Good for Trump. It *was* a horrible deal. Why on earth would we want to bring people over here that Australia decided that they didn't want?
    ================
    Open Borders: A Libertarian Reappraisal or why only dumbasses and cultural marxists are for it.

    Cultural Marxism: The Corruption of America

    The Property Basis of Rights

  26. #23
    Turnbull is just another globalist shill. I don't recall what Turnbull said about Trump during the campaign but I am sure it's not good. Hopefully Trump is actually working behind the scenes to get Abbott back as PM.

  27. #24
    Quote Originally Posted by TheCount View Post
    As Zippy mentioned, they built some refugee camps on islands and sticks them all there indefinitely. I'm not really sure about the why's of any of that, but assumed that it might be some Guantanamo-esque $#@! where they can treat them differently if they're not on Australia proper. Apparently Obama agreed to take half. I don't really know all the details.
    He could not close Gitmo.



  28. Remove this section of ads by registering.
  29. #25
    Quote Originally Posted by Zippyjuan View Post
    He can't help himself.
    Can you?

  30. #26
    Quote Originally Posted by LibertyEagle View Post
    Good for Trump. It *was* a horrible deal. Why on earth would we want to bring people over here that Australia decided that they didn't want?
    Who are these people anyway? Can we just give two F-15 with extra ammo and a free tech support to the kiwis and call it even?

  31. #27
    Quote Originally Posted by timosman View Post
    He could not close Gitmo.
    Let's not pass the buck; Congress passed a law preventing its closure.
    Quote Originally Posted by Swordsmyth View Post
    Pinochet is the model
    Quote Originally Posted by Swordsmyth View Post
    Liberty preserving authoritarianism.
    Quote Originally Posted by Swordsmyth View Post
    Enforced internal open borders was one of the worst elements of the Constitution.

  32. #28
    Quote Originally Posted by TheCount View Post
    Let's not pass the buck; Congress passed a law preventing its closure.
    He had the majority for the first two years in both houses. He could do anything.

  33. #29
    Quote Originally Posted by timosman View Post
    He had the majority for the first two years in both houses. He could do anything.
    Did Congress pass such a law or did they not? Whose signatures do you suppose were on it?
    Quote Originally Posted by Swordsmyth View Post
    Pinochet is the model
    Quote Originally Posted by Swordsmyth View Post
    Liberty preserving authoritarianism.
    Quote Originally Posted by Swordsmyth View Post
    Enforced internal open borders was one of the worst elements of the Constitution.

  34. #30
    Quote Originally Posted by TheCount View Post
    Did Congress pass such a law or did they not? Whose signatures do you suppose were on it?
    Please provide a link.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast


Similar Threads

  1. Should the USA accept Muslim refugees from the Middle East?
    By Smitty in forum Political Philosophy & Government Policy
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 04-13-2016, 05:17 PM
  2. Replies: 33
    Last Post: 03-26-2016, 01:51 PM
  3. Critique of Molyneux's Take on Muslim Immigration and Refugees
    By ProIndividual in forum Political Philosophy & Government Policy
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 01-03-2016, 06:43 PM
  4. Report: Obama to give up NSA's phone call sweep
    By Constitutional Paulicy in forum U.S. Political News
    Replies: 20
    Last Post: 03-26-2014, 01:34 AM
  5. Thousands of Syrian Muslim refugees coming to Christ
    By TER in forum Peace Through Religion
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 02-03-2014, 07:29 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •