Official First Interview w Kyle Rittenhouse on Tucker Carlson

[dannno]

Set to air Monday, 11/22




Preview:

[unknown]

Not for nothing, kid should just lay low for a while.

Just "disappear".

[CaptUSA]

Ugh... That preview looks horrendous!

Already they have top of the line production quality in movie format. Damn, Kyle, stay away from the corporate press! Both sides are using you as a pawn in their stupid culture war. It'll make great ratings for them, but it'll ruin your life. Ask the Covington kid.

Despite that $#@! Hannity pretending otherwise, Sandman is still suffering. And Hannity is blaming only one side of the corporate media.

[TheTexan]

It'll make great ratings for them, but it'll ruin your life. Ask the Covington kid.

Didn't he presumably win a huge settlement from CNN ?

[phill4paul]

Good. Time for him to start getting exposure that isn't Marxist bull$#@!. Time for a book deal, an AR-15 endorsement, more interviews, whatever it takes to make some bank after what he has been through. It's not like the State is going to pay for legal fees and pain-and-suffering at the hands of it's A.G.

[CaptUSA]

Didn't he presumably win a huge settlement from CNN ?

Yes. And he's got several more. But not sure that makes up for the damage done to his life.

[phill4paul]

Yes. And he's got several more. But not sure that makes up for the damage done to his life.

The damage has already been done.

[Dr.3D]

Good. Time for him to start getting exposure that isn't Marxist bull$#@!. Time for a book deal, an AR-15 endorsement, more interviews, whatever it takes to make some bank after what he has been through. It's not like the State is going to pay for legal fees and pain-and-suffering at the hands of it's A.G.

I believe, if the State had to pay all the legal fees in cases it lost, there would be a lot fewer of these kinds of cases.

[CCTelander]

I believe, if the State had to pay all the legal fees in cases it lost, there would be a lot fewer of these kinds of cases.

Why? Since they'd be paying with somebody else's money, there really is no incentive to change anything.

[phill4paul]

Why? Since they'd be paying with somebody else's money, there really is no incentive to change anything.

Pretty much.

[luctor-et-emergo]

Why? Since they'd be paying with somebody else's money, there really is no incentive to change anything.

Pretty much.

I concur. The state generally does not care about legal expenses. Especially when trying to save face or some strange policy they're persuing.

[CCTelander]

I concur. The state generally does not care about legal expenses. Especially when trying to save face or some strange policy they're persuing.

The state is never concerned with such mundane things as expenses. They're much more concerned with projecting power and authority, letting us know who's boss. As an example, in the case of Randy Weaver back in the 1990s they spent well over a million dollars in an attempt to collect what amounted to $400 in taxes due. Their Aim wasn't to collect taxes. It was to make an example of Weaver, which they certainly did.

[phill4paul]

The state is never concerned with such mundane things as expenses. They're much more concerned with projecting power and authority, letting us know who's boss. As an example, in the case of Randy Weaver back in the 1990s they spent well over a million dollars in an attempt to collect what amounted to $400 in taxes due. Their Aim wasn't to collect taxes. It was to make an example of Weaver, which they certainly did.

Exactly. The message they were trying to send this time is that as a concerned citizen thou shalt not interfere with our sanctioned and approved rioting.

[Suzu]

Why? Since they'd be paying with somebody else's money, there really is no incentive to change anything.

Insurance is who pays. Liability. And there *is* an incentive -- when enough suits get filed, the state can't get insurance anymore, and the officials become liable.

[pcosmar]

Not for nothing, kid should just lay low for a while.

Just "disappear".

Kid is gonna get Payed first.

[TheTexan]

Yes. And he's got several more. But not sure that makes up for the damage done to his life.

Assuming a 10 million+ settlement, I'd take that trade. It was likely more than that.

[A Son of Liberty]

The state is never concerned with such mundane things as expenses. They're much more concerned with projecting power and authority, letting us know who's boss. As an example, in the case of Randy Weaver back in the 1990s they spent well over a million dollars in an attempt to collect what amounted to $400 in taxes due. Their Aim wasn't to collect taxes. It was to make an example of Weaver, which they certainly did.

100%. But it's time we start collecting on that bill.

This has gone on long enough.

[69360]

Good. Time for him to start getting exposure that isn't Marxist bull$#@!. Time for a book deal, an AR-15 endorsement, more interviews, whatever it takes to make some bank after what he has been through. It's not like the State is going to pay for legal fees and pain-and-suffering at the hands of it's A.G.

No, it's time for him to forget all this crap, get his life back together and keep a low profile so he has some sembalance of normal life.

Personally the first thing I would do if I was him right now is take advantage of my newfound freedom, get a passport and leave the country for a few years until this all settles down.

[pcosmar]

No, it's time for him to forget all this crap, get his life back together and keep a low profile so he has some sembalance of normal life.

Personally the first thing I would do if I was him right now is take advantage of my newfound freedom, get a passport and leave the country for a few years until this all settles down.

Internship and then a State Seat. if he wants that.
Paid speaking tours,,if inclined.
He will have millions left after tax to do whatever he wants with.
And he will be honored in merchandise,, which he will also be compensated for..

Famous or infamous. he is Known.

[CaptUSA]

No, it's time for him to forget all this crap, get his life back together and keep a low profile so he has some sembalance of normal life.

Personally the first thing I would do if I was him right now is take advantage of my newfound freedom, get a passport and leave the country for a few years until this all settles down.

I don't think he'll ever be able to have a normal life. There is no where to run for this kid (they literally chased down the jury bus). He's going to have to learn to live with it however he wants. I just really hope he doesn't embrace the corporate media. Fox will chew him up as bad as MSNBC. If he wants to tell his story for all to hear, I just wish he'd do it using alternate media. The audience might be smaller, but he'd get real support and not abuse.

[Anti Globalist]

Not for nothing, kid should just lay low for a while.

Just "disappear".

Hopefully that's what he plans to do after he's done with these interviews.

[TheTexan]

If he wants to live a normal life all he has to do is grow a beard

[69360]

If he wants to live a normal life all he has to do is grow a beard

It will be his choice if he wants to have a normal life. Going on Tucker Carlson is not a step towards that IMO.

[TheTexan]

It will be his choice if he wants to have a normal life. Going on Tucker Carlson is not a step towards that IMO.

I'd defer to his attorney's opinion on that, re: civil suits.

Having $$ goes a long way towards being able to live a "normal life"

[pcosmar]

It will be his choice if he wants to have a normal life. .

Normal Life? LOL

I have no concept,, but I wish him a Good life..

[Occam's Banana]

If he wants to tell his story for all to hear, I just wish he'd do it using alternate media. The audience might be smaller, but he'd get real support and not abuse.

The audience might well not be smaller[1]. During the Rekieta Law streams of the trial, they occasionally checked the numbers, and the Steven Crowder and and Rekieta Law streams consistently had more viewers - sometimes significantly more - than any of the "mainstream" sources (PBS, CBS, etc.) who were providing "gavel to gavel" live-stream feeds. The Rekieta Law stream blew up after Jack Posobiec retweeted a Viva Frei post about it. If Rittenhouse went the independent or "alt" media route, word would get around and it would certainly blow up, too. And that would be fantastic. Because $#@! the corporate media (FOX included). /white-pill



[1] Well, okay, it probably would be smaller than Tucker's show, at least as far as the "live as it happens" audience goes. From what I understand, he's the 800-pound gorilla of cable news shows, with millions of real-time viewers. But the point is that social media has broken the corporate press' hammerlock on "the narrative" - and they have no idea what the hell to do about it except helplessly screeching about "disinformation" and feebly indulging in gratuitous "fact checking" that as often as not ends up making them look like even bigger fools.

[dannno]

[phill4paul]

He did great. To all the distractors go $#@! yourselves. Wring your hands and bleat a little moar.

[Brian4Liberty]

The charges and trial were political, and we have to put ourselves back at the time when it happened. I see three leftist establishment political agendas at work.

1 - As Rittenhouse said in his interview, it was about self-defense, and I would add it was very much about property defense and rights.

2 - And as usual, it was about gun rights and the 2nd Amendment.

3 - But at the time that this happened, we need to refresh our memories to the fact that this was very much about Trump, and the upcoming election. They painted Rittenhouse as a racist white supremacist, a militia member, and more than anything, a deplorable, despicable, murderous Trump supporter.

And make no mistake, the left establishment still has a war and vendetta on all three of those fronts.

Agree, but experience has shown that the left establishment are almost never held accountable. The prosecution of Rittenhouse was 100% political, decided upon before the DA had any evidence. It was done to satiate the leftist mobs, but more sinister, it was done as part of a DNC smear campaign on Trump supporters and white people. Remember it was before the POTUS election.

Some animals are more equal, and those animals are the establishment left.

The prosecutor is claiming that his statements which Rittenhouse responds “yes” to allow him to go anywhere he wants with the questioning.

Prosecutor has continually used the term “impeach”. He is “impeaching” Rittenhouse based upon words he put into Rittenhouse's mouth. It is also a subtle way to relate this to Trump.

Judge is pissed because the Judge had already prohibited the prosecutor from the line of questioning the prosecutor is using. Prosecutor has also violated the law and established legal standards.

And just a bit from Twitter...

Kyle Rittenhouse is a super hero only to White supremacists, Trump supporters and Nazis.

Watching segments of the Kyle Rittenhouse trial, if pay attention closely, you see white supremacy, written into these nations laws, play out to protect, white supremacy.

If Trump was still president he’d be nominating the judge in the Kyle Rittenhouse trial as a candidate for SCOTUS

Who thinks Donald Trump motivated the Kyle Rittenhouse murders?

The judge in the Rittenhouse case is acting like the third attorney for the defendant. I can only imagine the havoc that is going to result when this judge frees this murderous Anglo. This judge is why Trump stacking the courts is so dangerous - KKK on the bench!

...

[Anti Federalist]

He did great. To all the distractors go $#@! yourselves. Wring your hands and bleat a little moar.

Yes, he did.

Calm, cool, collected, sane, rational and under control.

We have not heard the last of Mr. Rittenhouse.