It's been well documented they pushed Trump forward, in their own words, so he would be easy pickings for Hillary. As well as Ted Cruz and Ben Carson.
https://twitter.com/wikileaks/status...513917440?s=20
In my first post in the thread, I posted "They ignored Ron Paul, so why would they ever give free publicity to a man they supposedly hate so much. That's the line you'll hear." Have heard this more times than I can remember and am aware. What's weird is Hillary and the media getting to choose which candidates they would have to face.
I can see why someone would use that as evidence, but I'm not buying it. I'm sure there is better evidence out there than the media going all in to prop up an easy pickings candidate like Trump for Hillary, admitting they are doing so in their own documents, the media following that plan to a T, and later not denying anything regarding the document once Wikileaks posted it.
I'm not sure how many more times this topic has to be hashed over. Either Wikileaks falsified their e-mails and documents and fooled us all or the DNC, Hillary, and the media were all in on it together in coordination with Wikileaks knowing they would find this and publish it eventually so us libertarians would be discussing it 4 years later on the rpf forums, or this theory doesn't hold water.
Connect With Us