Don't overeact to the Wyoming results - Learn from it NOW!!!!!!!!!!!!! - Page 3

newmedia4ron · 01-05-2008, 03:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by fireworks_god

Nearly everyone here loves to make up daydreams about how we will win all the time, and reality shows us that it isn't true.

Maybe now they will wake up and work together to win South Carolina! Go to Win In South Carolina forum! Let's win!

Canvass in your state and hold conference calls okay.

VoluntaryMan · 01-05-2008, 03:43 PM

Well, that's 1 for Mutt and 1 for Hack. By Tuesday, it could be 1 for McChain. Having a divided field is fine for us, just so long as we control a division. I think what we're learning is that these types of contests favor structure and organization, something that the campaign easily has enough bodies, enthusiasm, and money to coordinate. There's a difference between expecting to win and planning to win. We must always plan to win, expectations aside. These types of contests seem structured to thwart populism and spontaneity. Winning requires meticulous planning. Failing to plan = Planning to fail. I'm not sure that we can count on the primary states only for our success; we need to deal better with the more convoluted contests.

Bob Spruill · 01-05-2008, 04:12 PM

Quote:

Replying to how we have 0 delegates.

Understood. No Problem.

I just took it as a flame, at first impression, sorry.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

01-05-2008, 03:43 PM	#22
VoluntaryMan Senior Member Join Date: Dec 2007 Posts: 837	Well, that's 1 for Mutt and 1 for Hack. By Tuesday, it could be 1 for McChain. Having a divided field is fine for us, just so long as we control a division. I think what we're learning is that these types of contests favor structure and organization, something that the campaign easily has enough bodies, enthusiasm, and money to coordinate. There's a difference between expecting to win and planning to win. We must always plan to win, expectations aside. These types of contests seem structured to thwart populism and spontaneity. Winning requires meticulous planning. Failing to plan = Planning to fail. I'm not sure that we can count on the primary states only for our success; we need to deal better with the more convoluted contests.