Records Show Dr. Ford Is Not A Licensed Psychologist, May Have Committed Perjury

[NorthCarolinaLiberty]

...Kavanaugh's perjury.

Says RPFs extreme progressive and likely 2x voter for Obama who claims (in his avatar) to be a "supporting member" of RPF's mission.

Liar.

You got it, Angela. Zip claims (in his avatar) to be a "supporting member."

Ford was polite and quiet...Kavanaugh...was angry and loud.

I haven't watched this or really followed it at all, so can you elaborate? Did they use a decibel meter to measure the volume of both these people?

And what about the figures showing how one practically answered the questions and one did not? What measuring instrument did they use there?

The reason I ask these questions is because people often give these seemingly subjective answers without any measure to support it.

Thanks.

[NorthCarolinaLiberty]

This whole thing sounds retarded. I haven't followed these hearings, but it sounds like the hearings from a generation ago. I'd bet a cyber nickel Anita loved Clarence's BBC. She got miffed when he went off to get some other pussy. Just the usual stuff. The last straw for Anita was that Clarence preferred white girls.

There's three sides to every story: his side, her side, and the truth.

[shakey1]

I wonder if this has something to do with it?

Kavanaugh Accuser Christine Ford Donated to Clinton Campaign and DNC; Is Daughter of CIA Operative and VP of Security.

We now have an exclusive report on the new accuser, Deborah Ramirez, that calls her trustworthiness and her “organization” into question about her true motives.^^^
Brett Kavanaugh Accuser Christine Ford had allegedly donated to the Clinton Campaign using two separate location, potentially in violation of FEC laws, FEC donation documents show, in addition to her brother working for the CIA for numerous years.

Christine Ford, a California Psychologist and Professor at Stanford University, came out on Sunday after Feinstein revealed a letter by the woman days earlier about an alleged sexual assault that had happened 35 years ago at a Maryland college party.
The letter detailed, from Mrs. Ford’s perspective, about how Kavanaugh allegedly forced her onto a bed, laid on her before several other men in the room dog-piled onto her, before escaping the house and fleeing. CNN also obtained the letter in full, which also went into a little more detail about the incident:

At one point when REDACTED jumped onto the bed the weight on me was substantial. The pile toppled, and the two scrapped with each other. After a few attempts to get away, I was able to take this opportune moment to get up and run across to a hallway bathroom. I locked the bathroom door behind me. Both loudly stumbled down the stair well at which point other persons at the house were talking with them. I exited the bathroom, ran outside of the house and went home.

I have not knowingly seen Kavanaugh since the assault. I did see REDACTED once at the REDACTED where he was extremely uncomfortable seeing me.

I have received medical treatment regarding the assault. On July 6 I notified my local government representative to ask them how to proceed with sharing this information . It is upsetting to discuss sexual assault and its repercussions, yet I felt guilty and compelled as a citizen about the idea of not saying anything.

Despite the claims, no police records about the incident, medical documents or other witnesses have come forth fully verifying the incident took place as described. One of the men has come forth recently, stating no recollection of a party ever occurring, and 65 women have come to the defense of Brett Kavanaugh.
Despite vocal opposition from most Republican Senators, and Trump’s dismissal of the accusations, Senator Chuck Grassley has invited the accuser to testify in front of the Judiciary Committee, which has push backed the final vote on Kavanaugh.

However, in recent days, more info has come out about the accuser in question that puts the validity of her accusations into question, aside from criticisms of the allegation not being reported and investigated at the time. In some cases, the info that has been revealed and discovered has raised eyebrows among closely-watching citizens and independent news organizations.

https://thegodofrage.wordpress.com/2...p-of-security/

[angelatc]

This whole thing sounds retarded. I haven't followed these hearings, but it sounds like the hearings from a generation ago. I'd bet a cyber nickel Anita loved Clarence's BBC. She got miffed when he went off to get some other pussy. Just the usual stuff. The last straw for Anita was that Clarence preferred white girls.

There's three sides to every story: his side, her side, and the truth.

The Senate Democrats literally called him evil. The Senate Democrats literally said millions of people (apparently not babies though) would die if he was nominated. First they accused him of sexual assault, then rape, then gang rape, with nothing more than a sketchy story that keeps changing from over 30 years ago. They have mocked his children, called him an alcoholic, harassed his friends and family, sent death threats to the family.

Now they are concerned because he got angry? $#@! every single one of them.

[oyarde]

Senate dems remind me of Pol Pot . He often spoke of having a clear conscience . If they had a chance to seize what he did I imagine they would .

[Swordsmyth]

Senate dems remind me of Pol Pot . He often spoke of having a clear conscience . If they had a chance to seize what he did I imagine they would .

The left in this country is as bad or worse than any of the communists in history, if they gain sufficient power they will try to kill millions of us.

[oyarde]

The left in this country is as bad or worse than any of the communists in history, if they gain sufficient power they will try to kill millions of us.

That has always been what I believed . I still think I am right .

[Danke]

The left in this country is as bad or worse than any of the communists in history, if they gain sufficient power they will try to kill millions of us.

[Zippyjuan]

The left in this country is as bad or worse than any of the communists in history, if they gain sufficient power they will try to kill millions of us.

Wasn't Obama supposedly going to kill off people? Whatever happened with that?

[Swordsmyth]

Wasn't Obama supposedly going to kill off people? Whatever happened with that?

We kept him from getting enough power.

[PierzStyx]

RECORDS SHOW DR. FORD IS NOT A LICENSED PSYCHOLOGIST, MAY HAVE COMMITTED PERJURY

CHADWICK MOORE // EDITOR-IN-CHIEF // 9.28.18

Testifying under oath before the Senate Judiciary Committee, Christine Blasey Ford identified herself as a ‘psychologist,’ but records indict this is a false statement under California law. Someone at Stanford University also appears to have caught the blunder and edited Ford’s faculty page.
Just one sentence into her sworn testimony before the Senate Judiciary Committee regarding allegations of sexual assault against Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh, Dr. Christine Blasey Ford may have told a lie.

After thanking members of the committee on Thursday, and while under oath, Ford opened her testimony saying, “My name is Christine Blasey Ford, I am a professor of psychology at Palo Alto University and a research psychologist at the Stanford University School of Medicine.”

The issue lies with the word “psychologist,” and Ford potentially misrepresenting herself and her credentials, an infraction that is taken very seriously in the psychology field as well as under California law.

Under California law, as with almost every other state, in order for a person to identify publicly as a psychologist they must be licensed by the California Board of Psychology, a process that includes 3,000 hours of post-doctoral professional experience and passing two rigorous exams. To call oneself a psychologist without being licensed by a state board is the equivalent of a law school graduate calling herself a lawyer without ever taking the bar exam.

According to records, Ford is not licensed in the state of California. A recent search through the Department of Consumer Affairs License Bureau, which provides a state-run database of all licensed psychologists in California, produced no results for any variation of spelling on Ford’s name. If Ford at one time had a license but it is now inactive, she would legally still be allowed to call herself a “psychologist” but forbidden from practicing psychology on patients until it was renewed. However, the database would have shown any past licenses granted to Ford, even if they were inactive.

Read more: https://www.dangerous.com/49836/reco...itted-perjury/

Well, everyone knows you can't be something unless you buy a license from the State in order to get its almighty permission to be that thing.


Man, you people are stupid.

First of all, she didn't say she was a licensed psychologist. She said, "My name is Christine Blasey Ford. I am a Professor of Psychology at Palo Alto University and a Research Psychologist at the Stanford University School of Medicine."

https://www.npr.org/2018/09/26/65194...senate-hearing

All of which is true. A research psychologist is not a practicing field psychologist and is not bound by the same rules as the psychologist you go to for consulting and mental health.

Christine Margaret Blasey Ford is an American professor of psychology at Palo Alto University and a research psychologist at the Stanford University School of Medicine.

...Ford began teaching at Stanford University in 1988. As of September 2018, she teaches research design and education clinical psychology at Palo Alto University. Additionally, she participates in educational programs with the Stanford University School of Medicine as a member of a consortium group with Palo Alto University.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christine_Blasey_Ford

Stop falling for the same stupid, half-assed garbage explicitly created to manipulate your ignorant arse into supporting those who oppress you.

You all should be smarter than this idiocy.