Reply With Quote
Site Information
About Us
- RonPaulForums.com is an independent grassroots outfit not officially connected to Ron Paul but dedicated to his mission. For more information see our Mission Statement.
Meritorious.Originally Posted by FunkBuddha
freedomisobvious.blogspot.com
There is only one correct way: freedom. All other solutions are non-solutions.
It appears that artificial intelligence is at least slightly superior to natural stupidity.
Our words make us the ghosts that we are.
Convincing the world he didn't exist was the Devil's second greatest trick; the first was convincing us that God didn't exist.
Putting words into mouths that have not spoken them is not righteous. What mention did I make of either? The previous mention of Bolsheviks I took as a literary device meaning the bad men who hold no interest in you save that you obey them.So now we are either on the side of the Bolsheviks or the Fascists.
Perhaps we should all write-in Hitler? T'would make about as much sense as any of the others.
freedomisobvious.blogspot.com
There is only one correct way: freedom. All other solutions are non-solutions.
It appears that artificial intelligence is at least slightly superior to natural stupidity.
Our words make us the ghosts that we are.
Convincing the world he didn't exist was the Devil's second greatest trick; the first was convincing us that God didn't exist.
If you support Trump, then you are not eliminating one of the two; you are supporting one of the two.But we already have fascism. Eliminating 1 out of 2 is a start.So now we are either on the side of the Bolsheviks or the Fascists.
You must spread some Reputation around before giving it to phill4paul again.Well sure, because there is only two choices...ever. Bolsheviks or Fascists. Nationalists or Globalists. Right or Left. The boot size is the same.So now we are either on the side of the Bolsheviks or the Fascists.
The Bastiat Collection · FREE PDF · FREE EPUB · PAPER Frédéric Bastiat (1801-1850)
- "When law and morality are in contradiction to each other, the citizen finds himself in the cruel alternative of either losing his moral sense, or of losing his respect for the law."
-- The Law (p. 54)- "Government is that great fiction, through which everybody endeavors to live at the expense of everybody else."
-- Government (p. 99)- "[W]ar is always begun in the interest of the few, and at the expense of the many."
-- Economic Sophisms - Second Series (p. 312)- "There are two principles that can never be reconciled - Liberty and Constraint."
-- Harmonies of Political Economy - Book One (p. 447)· tu ne cede malis sed contra audentior ito ·
What about executing the innocent?
A serious problem, hence the requirement for multiple witnesses and a punishment of death for lying in a capital case.
This post represents only the opinions of Christian Liberty and not the rest of the forum. Use discretion when reading
Not infallible. Innocents will still be executed. And now you introduce the additional possibility that people falsely convicted of lying would be executed.
Yes they will....
Trump:
“I would be very, very firm with families,” he added. “Frankly, that will make people think, because they may not care much about their lives, but they do care, believe it or not, about their families’ lives.”
There's nothing stopping me (yet) from voting for Ron (or Rand) Paul. I think cycle's vote will go to Ron, since I didn't wake up until 2010. Man 2007/2008 must have been exciting as $#@!. This way I can honestly tell people I voted for Ron Paul, twice. This "election" is $#@!ing ridiculous.
Quoted for truth. Not much of a choice.
Of course I don't agree with Trump on this and many other issues (And besides, they're already killing terrorists' families - bombing entire wedding parties and funerals, indiscriminately killing everyone. You think that will stop with Hillary or any of the other puppets?), but I look at it this way:
America has cancer and Trump is the chemotherapy that will eliminate the tumors but destroy some healthy cells in the process. But do nothing and the patient dies.
Last edited by openfire; 03-07-2016 at 04:50 PM.
I LOL'd too.
As opposed to the establishment:
Last edited by openfire; 03-07-2016 at 05:01 PM.
This is why I'm against capital punishment, no matter who is meting it out. Unless you're God Himself, you really don't know who's guilty (ever hear there's at least two sides to every story?) and you're surely don't know if they've been forgiven.
Last edited by cajuncocoa; 03-07-2016 at 05:15 PM.
It's a serious problem that cannot be eliminated - any system of capital punishment will inevitably put innocents to death.A serious problem, hence the requirement for multiple witnesses and a punishment of death for lying in a capital case.What about executing the innocent?
And you still didn't answer the question: if executing the guilty isn't anti-life, then what about executing the innocent?
Exactly. Dealing with the problem of killing innocent people by killing more people is grotesquely absurd and irrational.Not infallible. Innocents will still be executed. And now you introduce the additional possibility that people falsely convicted of lying would be executed.
Wait, what? When did he say he was going to do all that?
BOWLING GREEN, Kentucky – Washington liberals are trying to push through the so-called DREAM Act, which creates an official path to Democrat voter registration for 2 million college-age illegal immigrants.
Rand Paul 2010
Booker T. Washington:
Cast it down among the eight millions of Negroes whose habits you know, whose
fidelity and love you have tested in days when to have proved treacherous meant the ruin of your firesides.
Where was this editorial cartoonist when Glenn Beck called us Ron Paul supporters "terrorists"?
Well, alright! Thanks, Root. I remember seeing those, and just noticed the name (Ben Garrison.) I should have looked at that on the Beck cartoon before posting my previous message.
No prob. It's always good to refresh these.
No bearing. Pointing out worst for worst doesn't increase your point. You're a Trumphumper. Consistency isn't your strong point. Or Trumps.
Do you think the other oligarchs that control Cruz, Rubio, and Clinton are crude like Trump? Case in point: https://www.washingtonpost.com/polit...f2e_story.html
Which is worse having an oligarch or be one step removed from the true experience that goes behind the curtain between a puppet and its oligarch(s)?
From a Safe Act Rally in 2014
I'm not as optimistic as this woman but her premise is correct.
You know, it's easy to see why the Clintons, the Obamas, the Rubios, etc., want to be president. These people all got rich off politics and it would make them set for life.
Has anyone thought what a step down this would be for the Trumps? Both Donald and Melania have their own business, which would have to go into some sort of blind financial structure. That sounds very complicated for people who are as rich as they are. They would have to move to Washington. Donald is a native New Yorker. His kids and grandchildren are all there. He still has a son at home who would have to move away from his aunts, uncles, and cousins and go to a new school. Taxpayers would probably save a lot of money on their vacations since they own property everywhere they want to go, but I can't imagine being 70 years old and uprooting myself and my family to move to Washington and put up with a pain-in-the neck Congress and the egocentric press.
#NashvilleStrong
“I’m a doctor. That’s a baby.”~~~Dr. Manny Sethi
That's what it all comes down to, all of the others are bought and payed for, except Trump, but like you said, he is one of the buyers, one of the first questions I come up with there is.... does he have anything in his heart for his country? I have to say, he doesn't give a $#@! what anyone thinks of him, he's not walking around tiptoeing around for votes like all of the others, I can't believe it myself, but I may vote for him looking at it from osan's point of view. As far as all of his hard-line talk torture etc.. I think he's just feeding and I do rationalize that he can't legally do all of that crap by himself.
Again, it's a gamble, but he is the only one that is not totally controlled by the banks, all of the other issues are void after that...........
FJB
The banks can destroy Trump, all they have to do is call in their loans.
“I don’t think that there will be any curtailing of Donald Trump as president,” he said. "He controls the media, he controls the sentiment [and] he controls everybody. He’s the one who will resort to executive orders more so than [President] Obama ever used them." - Ron Paul
“I don’t think that there will be any curtailing of Donald Trump as president,” he said. "He controls the media, he controls the sentiment [and] he controls everybody. He’s the one who will resort to executive orders more so than [President] Obama ever used them." - Ron Paul
OMG! He really "owned" him...
Pfizer Macht Frei!
Openly Straight Man, Danke, Awarded Top Rated Influencer. Community Standards Enforcer.
Quiz: Test Your "Income" Tax IQ!
Short Income Tax Video
The Income Tax Is An Excise, And Excise Taxes Are Privilege Taxes
The Federalist Papers, No. 15:
Except as to the rule of appointment, the United States have an indefinite discretion to make requisitions for men and money; but they have no authority to raise either by regulations extending to the individual citizens of America.
Connect With Us