Site Information
About Us
- RonPaulForums.com is an independent grassroots outfit not officially connected to Ron Paul but dedicated to his mission. For more information see our Mission Statement.
He is an agent of the deep, state, a puppet in a well orchestrated show.
He is an agent of Putin
He is an agent of Putin/Deep State/Putin or illuminati, freemasons, etc
He is an agent for himself. He is just in it for money and glory.
He is a populist. He is just trying to win 2020 by being popular.
So you are a Christian, and believe he is an agent of Satan? And Russia, and the deep state?
Whatever dude.
If you think he is an agent for satan, then you're jsut a religious fundamentalist.
Most Christians would not say he was an agent of Satan.
So I think you are just trying to avoid publicly voting in the poll.
I already called it, you won't vote in it, and fund 100 excuses not to.
And it is because you have argued all of them. Even though some of them are quite mutually exclusive.
I do.
Primarily because of their investments in his businesses over the years.
Although I dont necessarily agree, some have suggested that the Russians essentially "own" Trump.
While I agree with the following, I dont think it stems from Trump's "ideals" of non-interventionism (lol) but rather his pro-Russian bias.
Trump campaign guts GOP’s anti-Russia stance on Ukraine.
Last edited by unknown; 03-17-2017 at 11:15 PM.
"An idea whose time has come cannot be stopped by any army or any government" - Ron Paul.
"To learn who rules over you simply find out who you arent allowed to criticize."
There's nothing to corrupt: no principles to betray. He's a reflexive leftist, because he grew up on leftist media and never gave politics any serious thought (like most people), but the reason he's serving leftism isn't so much that as that it's simply the path of least resistance (like for most politicians - hence the dominance of leftism). As for whether the big special interests supported him from the start or just fell ass backwards into the goldmine which is the Trump Presidency? Hard to say, speculative. At the outset, I doubt he was being supported by any of "them," or opposed by any of "them," or even noticed by any of "them." He probably ran as a publicity stunt and things snowballed from there, to the surprise of everyone, including Trump. To the extent that any of "them" ever opposed him later in the campaign, I'd say the reason was fear he would lose them the general election, not that he wouldn't be a pliant tool as President (which he clearly is).
There's the problem with this "them."
There is no "them." There's a cluster of "thems."
Some thems are in the Republican orbit, some the Democratic orbit.
People say Dems and GOPers aren't really fighting over anything: not true.
They aren't fighting over principles, but they are fighting over who gets the best spot at the trough.
Last edited by MallsRGood; 03-17-2017 at 11:29 PM.
I'm saying that some special interests have more to gain from a GOP government than a Dem government, and vice versa.
...even though all the special interests are after the same kind of government-growing policies.
And not just business lobbies, the upper echelons of the parties themselves are powerful political forces.
Don't you think Reince Priebus is making more money now that a GOPer is in the White House?
If so, don't you think he wanted the nominee to be as electable as possible?
Last edited by MallsRGood; 03-17-2017 at 11:46 PM.
He's a witting pawn of the GOP aligned special interests (which are mostly the same as the Dem aligned special interests).
As Hillary would have been a witting pawn of the Dem aligned special interests (which are mostly the same as...etc).
And the difference is negligible. Perhaps a little less cheddar gets thrown at the Solyndras and a little more at the Raytheons.
Tomato tomahto from a libertarian POV.
Last edited by MallsRGood; 03-17-2017 at 11:55 PM.
Connect With Us