Neocons Plan: War in Syria, then Iran

[Brian4Liberty]

Neocons Plan: War in Syria, then Iran
written by adam dick - september 13, 2018

Interviewed Tuesday by host Sharmini Peries at The Real News, Lawrence Wilkerson, a College of William & Mary professor and former chief of staff for United States Secretary of State Colin Powell, warned that “the neoconservative agenda” for an escalated United States war on Syria followed by war on Iran has had a “resurrection” in President Donald Trump’s administration.

Regarding talk about the US taking military action in Syria in response to potential allegations of the use of chemical weapons — false flag or otherwise — in the country, Wilkerson comments that the war advocates are “looking for every excuse, any excuse, all excuses, to reopen US operations, major U.S. operations, against [President Bashar al-Assad] in Syria, always realizing that the ultimate target is Tehran.” Tehran is the capital of Iran.

Addressing previous allegations of chemical weapons use by the Syria government that were used to justify US military actions in the country, Wilkerson, who is an Academic Board member for the Ron Paul Institute for Peace and Prosperity, states that he has seen “no proof” that Assad “ever used chemical weapons” and disparages the reputability of the White Helmets organization whose claims have been used to build support for US military actions in Syria.

Wilkerson further warns that the neoconservative agenda regarding war on Syria and Iran also threatens both conflict between the US and Russia and the long-term bogging down of US military forces in major conflict. Wilkerson states: “My serious concern is about the way [US National Security Advisor John Bolton] and others in their positions of power now are orchestrating a scenario whereby Donald Trump, for political reasons or whatever, can use force in a significant way against Assad and ultimately Iran, because Iran’s forces are there, and ultimately against Russia, because their forces are there in Syria, and this is most disquieting.” The neoconservatives’ military plan, argues Wilkerson, is “a recipe for” the US military being in the region for “the next generation” with significant force “mired even deeper in this morass” and with the “day after day” attrition of dollars and lives.

Watch Wilkerson’s complete interview here:
...
http://ronpaulinstitute.org/archives...ria-then-iran/

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6mtpeouo_X8

[enhanced_deficit]

Neocos money baggers know their game well. In 2008 "Anti-war" HopnChanger was perfect for new militant interventions planned for Libya, Syria and now "build America first" MAGA is pefect puppet for continued Syria interventions and raising war tensions with Iran.

[goldenequity]

let's not leave out Ukraine...
it's exactly the same thing: same state dept, same military, same policy:

.....are “looking for every excuse, any excuse, all excuses, to reopen US operations, major U.S. operations, against [President Bashar al-Assad] in Syria, always realizing that the ultimate target is Tehran. Russia. ”


--------
Peter KORZUN | 16.09.2018
Azov Sea Flashpoint: Russia, Ukraine Teetering on the Brink of War
https://www.strategic-culture.org/ne...brink-war.html

Current...
►creation of a missile-equipped naval infantry group to counter potential amphibious attacks
►Gurza-M-class armored artillery boats brought in
►Ukrainian authorities insist on their 'right' to detain any ship traveling to or from Crimea without Kiev’s permission.
►Ukraine calling for the imposition of international sanctions against Russian Black Sea ports (has already imposed punitive measures unilaterally)

Without bothering to study the details, the State Department has taken a deliberately provocative stance,
urging Ukraine into seeking a military solution: (including such unrealistic but dangerous ideas as)

►using the warships of NATO’s standing force to protect its shipping lanes,
►mining the Azov Sea
►using fast-moving attack vessels to encircle a large Russian naval asset from all directions like a wolf pack.
(This tactic was invented by German Admiral Karl Dönitz during WWII, when “wolf packs” of U-boats were used to attack capital ships.)

Harpoon Missiles

Stephen Blank of the American Foreign Policy Council, a leading US expert on Russia, believes that the US administration
“should send anti-ship missiles available from or through the US-AGM-84 Harpoon Block II, AGM-158C LRASM A, and the Norwegian Naval Strike Missile”
as well as
“a viable launch platform and a targeting system, particularly a radar.”
The author thinks this should be done right now, without delay.

His article was published on Sept. 7 by the Atlantic Council,
the prestigious think tank that advises the State Department and enjoys great influence among those who shape US foreign policy.

Kurt Volker, US Special Representative for Ukraine Negotiations, stated
the US administration “is ready to expand arms supplies to Ukraine in order to build up the country’s naval and air defense forces.”

[AZJoe]

NATO Amassed Warships By Syria Just Before Attack On Lattakia

Combat vessels from the Second Standing NATO Maritime Group (NATO Maritime Group 2) moved closer to Syria’s borders on the 16th of September … sudden buildup as related to the French/US/Israeli strike on Lattakia and the downing of the Russian il-20 aircraft …

the eastern Mediterranean is now being patrolled by the Canadian Navy frigate HMCS Ville de Quebeс, by the Greek navy ship Elli and by the Dutch Navy frigate HNLMS De Ruyter …

In addition … three American destroyers (USS Carney, USS Ross and USS Winston S. Churchill) are already in the region, as well as the USS 6th Fleet Admiral USS Mount Whitney. The waters are also being patrolled by at least three Los Angeles-class US nuclear submarines. … the armament of the current US naval group in the Mediterranean includes more than 200 Tomahawk cruise missiles.
Earlier, near the Syrian coast was noted the nuclear submarine HMS Talent of the British Navy …

This comes as days ago the Arleigh Burke-class destroyer USS Bulkeley (DDG-84) entered the Mediterranean through the Strait of Gibraltar … In the waters of the Mediterranean Sea are four North American destroyers: USS Bulkeley, USS Carney, USS Ross and USS Winston S. Churchill.
In addition, the Los Angeles-class US Navy USS Newport News (SSN-750) equipped with Tomahawk also reached the Mediterranean.

At the beginning of September, Russia carried out major naval exercises in the Mediterranean Sea, involving 26 warships, two submarines and Tu-160, Tu-142, Il-38, Su-33 and Su-30SM aircraft. The presence of Russian ships in the area was seen as an obstacle to possible further US attacks on the Arab country.

[shakey1]

Careful we don't bite off more than we can chew... again

[Swordsmyth]

USS Winston S. Churchill

Why does America have a ship named for a British PM?

[James_Madison_Lives]

It's not just Neocons. It's Neocons with close ties to Israel. This list of regime change has been talked about among right-wing Zionists for decades, starting with Oded Yinon.

Oded Yinon in "A Strategy for Israel in the Nineteen Eighties":

"Iraq, rich in oil on the one hand and internally torn on the other, is guaranteed as a candidate for Israel's targets. Its dissolution is even more important for us than that of Syria. Iraq is stronger than Syria. In the short run it is Iraqi power which constitutes the greatest threat to Israel. An Iraqi-Iranian war will tear Iraq apart and cause its downfall at home even before it is able to organize a struggle on a wide front against us. Every kind of inter-Arab confrontation will assist us in the short run and will shorten the way to the more important aim of breaking up Iraq into denominations as in Syria and in Lebanon. In Iraq, a division into provinces along ethnic/religious lines as in Syria during Ottoman times is possible. So, three (or more) states will exist around the three major cities: Basra, Baghdad and Mosul, and Shi'ite areas in the south will separate from the Sunni and Kurdish north."- "A Strategy for Israel in the Nineteen Eighties" http://cosmos.ucc.ie/cs1064/jabowen/...le0005345.html


Then you have Douglas Feith and Richard Perle, two Bush Defense Department appointees. They said in the 1996 paper "A Clean Break: A New Strategy for Securing the Realm":

"Israel can shape its strategic environment, in cooperation with Turkey and Jordan, by weakening, containing, and even rolling back Syria. This effort can focus on removing Saddam Hussein from power in Iraq — an important Israeli strategic objective in its own right — as a means of foiling Syria’s regional ambitions." - "A Clean Break: A New Strategy for Securing the Realm" https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A_Clea...ring_the_Realm


Fact: Five confirmed Israeli Mossad spies were arrested in NYC on 9/11 filming the burning towers, cheering and high-fiving. It can determined that they set up the camera BEFORE the first plane hit, at Liberty State Park in Jersey City, with an unobstructed view of the towers. ABC News: http://abcnews.go.com/2020/story?id=123885&page=1


Fact: The Israelis were driving around in a van which tested positive for traces of explosives. History Commons: http://www.historycommons.org/contex...01fiveisraelis


FBI report on Israeli Mossad agents in NYC on 9/11: http://takeourworldback.com/dancingi...sfbireport.htm


Fact: The same tactic of using a false flag attack to drag America into doing Israel's bidding in the Middle East was employed in the USS Liberty attack, which killed 34 American sailors and was designed to drag us into war with Egypt. See Military.com http://www.military.com/video/forces.../3875358637001


Fact: Command and control of US air defenses was built on the PTech platform, with ties to Israeli intel: http://www.digitaljournal.com/news/w...#ixzz3SVgFyYnM


Fact: General Wes Clark confirmed that Oded Yinon's plan of regime change across the Middle East was the real purpose of the Iraq invasion.

"And he said, "This is a memo that describes how we're going to take out seven countries in five years, starting with Iraq, and then Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and, finishing off, Iran."" - Wes Clark



No it was the same people who attacked the USS Liberty to drag us into war with Egypt, with the help of American traitors high up in the defense and intelligence establishment. That means Israel. Bush was probably given an ultimatum to go along with the coup or die. Of course few Americans know any of this because they are so manipulable by online Israeli shills who regularly start threads to reinforce the message DEM MOOSLUMS!

Fact: Bin Laden denied 9/11 numerous times.

"I have already said that I am not involved in the 11 September attacks in the United States. As a Muslim, I try my best to avoid telling a lie. I had no knowledge of these attacks, nor do I consider the killing of innocent women, children, and other humans as an appreciable act." - Bin Laden interview with Daily Ummat, Sept. 2001, posted in Lew Rockwell

"The United States should try to trace the perpetrators of these attacks within itself; the people who are a part of the U.S. system, but are dissenting against it. Or those who are working for some other system; persons who want to make the present century as a century of conflict between Islam and Christianity." - Bin Laden interview with Daily Ummat, Sept. 2001, posted in Lew Rockwell


Ask who benefits. What did 9/11 accomplish? The destruction of Muslim countries, which sit on land Israel wants. Just like Oded Yinon strategized decades ago.

[AZJoe]