1. Voting turnout was lower in 2012 than in 2008
2. I dont know off-hand how many and who was still in the race in 2008, but perhaps a large portion of Paul's votes were protest votes against the top 1 or 2 candidates. 2008 votes does not necessarily mean Paul was their favorite. There's a reason why we get more votes when candidates drop out.
3. Early morning caucus means a lot of old people and few young people. This was evident in the polling statistics.
The people here claiming that someone somehow manipulated voting totals from 1,800 different precincts is stupid plain and simple. I don't care if you're a member of RPF or not but if you seriously think someone was able to change votes in that many precincts you're out of your mind and you make the rest of RPF look dumb. Were there suspicious things in the Nevada voting? Sure, but that is not on the same scale we're talking about here.
Site Information
About Us
- RonPaulForums.com is an independent grassroots outfit not officially connected to Ron Paul but dedicated to his mission. For more information see our Mission Statement.
Connect With Us