Who will win 2020 Presidential Election?

[enhanced_deficit]

Polling closes in two days, late votes will not be accepted.

[KEEF]

Polling closes in two days, late votes will not be accepted.

But what if I change the post mark of my vote to before the due date?

[enhanced_deficit]

But what if I change the post mark of my vote to before the due date?

Although does not seem fair but technically might be possible if you can somehow manage to convince administrators/developers of this platform that it will be for the greater good of democratic process

[KEEF]

Although does not seem fair but technically might be possible if you can somehow manage to convince administrators/developers of this platform that it will be for the greater good of democratic process

Hey any means necessary, any precedent set , is justified by the end result... at least that is what all my lefty comrades tell me.

[Anti Globalist]

No matter who ends up winning half the country will think they're illegitimate.

[enhanced_deficit]

Unfortunately seems that way at this point. Hopefully Joe will try to reach out to Donald's supporters and Kamala H will build bonds with Mike P's base to try to promote national unity and harmony once emotions cool down post transition.

[nikcers]

We are all national socialists now.

[Contumacious]

The Honorable Donald J Trump

[Contumacious]

Yes indeed

[enhanced_deficit]

We are all national socialists now.

The Honorable Donald J Trump

He was up against tough odds to begin with after Rudy Giuliani's claim about corona plague. Then some powerful deep pockets lobbies helped in election being stolen from him allegedly. There are some shocking reports that his own top donor and Foxnews hae turned on him,
The is a sad end for a sitting Prez who got over 70M vote.

Socialism was already here in abudance though, to be fair.

[pcosmar]

Socialism was already here in abudance though, to be fair.

and you know I had never been a fan of Trump..
as much as I dislike his Clownish Persona,, it works for him.

Socialism has been here since the Socialist Coup of 1913.

we deal with what we have..

Massive and Blatant Vote Fraud being Exposed.. (a wet dream in 2008)

Corruption in both parties being exposed..

CIA and FBI under scrutiny.

perhaps small hopes,, but there are some uglier alternatives..

[nikcers]

Socialism was already here in abudance though, to be fair.

We will all go together when we die.

Unity.

A recent study found that 15% of Republicans and 20% of Democrats think the country would be better off if large numbers of opposing partisans “just died.”

“Remember, democracy never lasts long. It soon wastes, exhausts, and murders itself. There never was a democracy yet that did not commit suicide.”
—John Adams

[Contumacious]

I agree that we have been under fascism since , at least , 1913, But we still enjoy the most basic of all freedoms, the right to bear arms to defend our lives.

If Alzheimer’s Joe gets elected he will pack the court with socialists who will deny us the right.

[nikcers]

I agree that we have been under fascism since , at least , 1913, But we still enjoy the most basic of all freedoms, the right to bear arms to defend our lives.

If Alzheimer’s Joe gets elected he will pack the court with socialists who will deny us the right.

This whole trend where a third of voters think the country would be better if people who think differently just died should be concerning. Especially when one group of voters wants to run the lives of the other group. It would be a shame if they ran the government that way. It's not like they would openly just say that's what they are gonna do. It would be a lie with a smile.

[Contumacious]

This whole trend where a third of voters think the country would be better if people who think differently just died should be concerning. Especially when one group of voters wants to run the lives of the other group. It would be a shame if they ran the government that way. It's not like they would openly just say that's what they are gonna do. It would be a lie with a smile.

[enhanced_deficit]

Wishful thought,,for Trump..

and not because I support him or the GOP,, but because the alternative is obnoxious.

I supported Trump in 2016 over HRC based on his promises but it soon became clear that he was only marginally better and was mostly following populust public opinion that had shifted after painfullly learning the hard way from failures of Bush-Obama. That's not leadership but rather followership. I'm coming to realization that getting blackmailed into sticking with poor public servants also has huge costs and greater focus should be on holding accountable whoever is in office and increasing rotation/reducing term limits etc.

Quote:
Cleaning house continuously till clean leadership emerges is not a bad idea given how swampy system is, holding feet of public servants to fire from the start to keep them on their toes. There have been two many two-term Prez in recent history including some of the worst ones.
If political culture changes where people are not willing to tolerate swampy conduct in office, personalities sort of become less important. Politicians often are puppets of their biggest donors anyways. If deep pockets investments kept sinking after 1 or fractional terms, maybe buyers/bribers of politicians will start rethinking too. A system of accountability that rewards pro-public interests conduct and punishes puppets of swamp is more important than name of the office holder.

[enhanced_deficit]

Christian evangelicals were one demographic that stood with Trump with most steadfastness so far, this is stunning unless Jimmy Kimmel posted doctored video/out of context. At 5:00 mark, Pat Roberson using football analogy suggests game is over and Trump lost:


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a5UnClxnVvA